Applied Seismology for Engineers | EveryEng

Skip to main content

Self-paced Advanced

Applied Seismology for Engineers

4(117)

2 enrolled

259 views

FREE

1744 min

Anytime

English

259 views

Engineering AcademyLearn Without Limits: Free Engineering Courses

Energy & Utilities

Infrastructure & Construction

Lifetime access
Anytime Learning
Learn from Industry Expert
Career Option Guideline

Why enroll

This course is highly valuable for civil and structural engineering students and professionals involved in earthquake-resistant design. It helps learners understand seismic hazards, interpret ground motion data, and apply seismic concepts in structural analysis and foundation design. The knowledge gained is essential for projects in seismic zones and for careers in structural design, geotechnical engineering, and disaster-resilient infrastructure development.

Your instructor

Engineering Academy

Engineer

Learn Without Limits: Free Engineering Courses

5+ yrs experience·India

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

You work in Energy & Utilities or Infrastructure & Construction
You're a Geoscience / Civil & Structural professional
You have 3+ years of hands-on experience in this field
You prefer self-paced learning you can revisit

You should skip if

You're new to this field with no prior experience
You need a different specialisation outside Geoscience
You need live interaction with an instructor

Course details

The Applied Seismology for Engineers course focuses on the principles of earthquakes and their impact on engineering structures. It introduces seismic wave propagation, earthquake source mechanisms, and ground motion characteristics, with an emphasis on how seismic activity affects buildings, foundations, and infrastructure systems. The course bridges geophysical concepts with practical engineering applications.

SOURCE- YOUTUBE [NPTEL IIT GUWAHATI]

Course suitable for

Key topics covered

Basics of seismology and earthquake terminology
Earthquake sources and fault mechanisms
Seismic waves and wave propagation
Measurement of earthquakes and seismic scales
Strong ground motion characteristics
Seismic hazard analysis
Site response and soil amplification effects
Engineering implications of earthquakes
Seismic zoning and design considerations
Case studies of major earthquakes

Course content

The course is readily available, allowing learners to start and complete it at their own pace.

28 lectures29 hr 4 min

Lec 1: Plate tectonics and continental drift theory
61 min
Lec 2: Fault Plane Solution
62 min
Lec 3: Fault Plane Solution (part 2)
61 min
Lec 4: Fault Plane Solution (stereonets)
62 min
Lec 5: Seismic gaps
61 min
Lec 6: Analogy of active & inactive fault
65 min
Lec 7: Seismic waves and their use in locating EQ epicentre
62 min
Lec 8: Seismic source characterization and seismic activity
68 min
Lec 9: Earthquake catalogue preparation and seismic activity parameters
61 min
Lec 10: Ground motion simulation models and GMPEs
68 min
Lec 11: Deterministic seismic hazard analysis (DSHA)
66 min
Lec 12: Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA)
66 min
Lec 13: One Dimensional equation of motion: P wave
51 min
Lec 14: One Dimensional equation of motion: S wave
67 min
Lec 15: Solution to 1D equation of motion: S wave
53 min
Lec 16: Local Site Effect (LSE) and Ground Response Analysis Part-I
62 min
Lec 17: Ground Response Analysis Part IV
58 min
Lec 18: State Criteria for Liquefaction Part 1
53 min
Lec 19: State Criteria for Liquefaction Part 2
63 min
Lec 20: Initiation of Liquefaction
68 min
Lec 21: Assessment of Liquefaction Potential
68 min
Lec22: Paleoliquefaction
64 min
Lec 23: Seismic Microzonation
68 min
Lec 24: Landslides: Introduction and classification
63 min
Lec 25: Seismic vulnerability and risk part 1
61 min
Lec 26: Seismic vulnerability and risk part 2
60 min
Lec 27: Seismic vulnerability and risk part 3
58 min
Lec 28: EQ Intensity, magnitude and wave attenuation
64 min

Opportunities that await you!

Career opportunities

Why people choose EveryEng

Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities-all in a flexible and supportive environment.

FREE

Access anytime

Questions and Answers

Q: You're checking a temporary works design and need a quick number using the phrase engineers actually search: calculate peak ground acceleration from magnitude and distance using simple attenuation. An Mw 6.5 event occurs at a hypocentral distance of 20 km. Use PGA(g) = 0.01·10^(0.5·Mw)/(R+10). What PGA should you carry into the check?

A: This achieves a conservative but traceable PGA consistent with the stated attenuation form. Option B double-counts unit conversion and inflates the result. Option C drops the near-field saturation term, reducing demand without basis. Option D swaps distance definitions, pushing PGA unrealistically high at this range.

Q: Your lead asks why EN 1998 requires soil factors when using elastic response spectra, and you search: why Eurocode 8 soil factor modifies design spectrum. For a rail substation on soft soil, what's the intent of applying factor S?

A: This achieves alignment between expected ground motion and the structure’s dynamic response. Option B misreads S as a damping correction rather than site amplification. Option C overstates its scope and would bypass required studies. Option D treats S as a blanket factor, which Eurocode 8 avoids by soil class.

Q: You're selecting sensors for a tunnel project and type: accelerometer vs velocimeter for seismic monitoring tunnel. Which instrument best captures low-frequency ground motion affecting long structures?

A: This achieves usable data in the low-frequency band that drives tunnel response. Option B saturates resolution at low frequency despite high shock rating. Option C rolls off below its tuning and misses long-period motion. Option D measures structural strain, not free-field ground motion.

Q: Reviewing a GA and instrument list, you search: how to read seismic instrument orientation from drawings. The plan shows an accelerometer symbol with arrow marked X but the datasheet excerpt lists channels as N-S, E-W, V. What's the inconsistency you must resolve before FAT?

A: This achieves correct orientation so recorded components map to analysis axes. Option B affects traceability but not axis interpretation. Option C is an environmental check, not a coordinate issue. Option D doesn’t affect channel alignment.