AutoCAD Electrical
Tell us and we’ll notify you when the next batch is scheduled.
- 7-day money-back guarantee
- Session recordings included
- Certificate of completion
Why enroll
Your instructor
Subodh Sawant
Design Manager Electrical Engineering
Design Manager-Electrical Engineering (HOD)
Is this course for you?
You should take this if
- You work in Industrial Automation
- You're a Electrical Engineering professional
- You have some foundational knowledge in the subject
- You prefer live, instructor-led training with Q&A
You should skip if
- You're looking for an introductory overview course
- You need a different specialisation outside Electrical Engineering
- You need fully self-paced, on-demand content
Course details
Course suitable for
Key topics covered
Opportunities that await you!
Skills & tools you'll gain
Career opportunities
Training details
This is a live course that has a scheduled start date.
Live session
Starts
Sun, Mar 9, 2025
Duration
4 hours per day
Why people choose EveryEng
Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities-all in a flexible and supportive environment.
What learners say about this course
Came away with a different lens on refactoring legacy electrical layouts without blowing up existing infra. The grounding and bonding chapter stuck, especially the subpanel walkthrough where the neutral/ground tie gets relocated and the knock-on effects are traced. It bridged to how I think about arch changes in prod—how a tweak lands in the repo, survives a PR, and shows up in obs. Wasn't sold on the short motor-starting calc section; wished there was more on fault current, but it did close the gap between what I knew and what I thought I knew.
At first glance, the topics looked familiar, but the depth surprised me. Coming from a working background in oil & gas facilities and some crossover automotive automation projects, the way the course tied control panel design to real operating constraints stood out. The sections on PLC I/O schematics and IEC vs NEC differences helped close a gap I’ve had when reviewing vendor panels for compressor skids and test benches. One challenge was keeping up during the CAD-based schematic work. Moving from concept to a clean, standards‑compliant drawing in EPLAN took more effort than expected, especially around wire numbering and terminal planning. That said, struggling through that part mirrored real project pressure more than a polished demo would have. The most practical takeaway was a clearer method for panel layout—spacing, heat dissipation, and grounding decisions now feel intentional instead of rule-of-thumb. The safety modules, especially LOTO and grounding practices, directly apply to both refinery panels and automotive assembly cells where audits are common. This wasn’t abstract theory; it lined up with panels I’ve actually had to troubleshoot during commissioning. I can see this being useful in long-term project work.
Came away with a different lens on refactoring legacy electrical layouts without blowing up existing infra. The grounding and bonding chapter stuck, especially the subpanel walkthrough where the neutral/ground tie gets relocated and the knock-on effects are traced. It bridged to how I think about arch changes in prod—how a tweak lands in the repo, survives a PR, and shows up in obs. Wasn't sold on the short motor-starting calc section; wished there was more on fault current, but it did close the gap between what I knew and what I thought I knew.
At first glance, the topics looked familiar, but the depth surprised me. Coming from a working background in oil & gas facilities and some crossover automotive automation projects, the way the course tied control panel design to real operating constraints stood out. The sections on PLC I/O schematics and IEC vs NEC differences helped close a gap I’ve had when reviewing vendor panels for compressor skids and test benches. One challenge was keeping up during the CAD-based schematic work. Moving from concept to a clean, standards‑compliant drawing in EPLAN took more effort than expected, especially around wire numbering and terminal planning. That said, struggling through that part mirrored real project pressure more than a polished demo would have. The most practical takeaway was a clearer method for panel layout—spacing, heat dissipation, and grounding decisions now feel intentional instead of rule-of-thumb. The safety modules, especially LOTO and grounding practices, directly apply to both refinery panels and automotive assembly cells where audits are common. This wasn’t abstract theory; it lined up with panels I’ve actually had to troubleshoot during commissioning. I can see this being useful in long-term project work.