Geotechnical Engineering - II | EveryEng

Skip to main content

Self-paced Advanced

Geotechnical Engineering - II

4(117)

232 views

FREE

714 min

Anytime

English

232 views

Engineering AcademyLearn Without Limits: Free Engineering Courses

Infrastructure & Construction

Geotechnical Engineering

Lifetime access
Anytime Learning
Learn from Industry Expert
Career Option Guideline

Why enroll

This course is essential for civil engineering students and professionals aiming to specialize in geotechnical engineering and foundation design. It provides the technical foundation required for designing safe foundations and earth-retaining systems and is highly relevant for construction projects, infrastructure development, and geotechnical consultancy. The course is also important for competitive exams, higher studies, and research in geotechnical and earthquake engineering.

Your instructor

Engineering Academy

Engineer

Learn Without Limits: Free Engineering Courses

5+ yrs experience·India

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

You work in Infrastructure & Construction
You're a Geotechnical Engineering / Civil & Structural professional
You have 3+ years of hands-on experience in this field
You prefer self-paced learning you can revisit

You should skip if

You're new to this field with no prior experience
You need a different specialisation outside Geotechnical Engineering
You need live interaction with an instructor

Course details

The Geotechnical Engineering – II course provides an in-depth understanding of soil behavior and its application in the analysis and design of geotechnical structures. Building upon basic soil mechanics concepts, the course focuses on how soils respond to external loads and environmental conditions and how this behavior influences the safety and performance of civil engineering structures.

The course begins with stress distribution in soils due to surface and subsurface loads and examines consolidation and settlement behavior of soils under long-term loading. Learners study primary and secondary consolidation, rate of settlement, and methods for predicting total and differential settlements. The course further explores shear strength characteristics of soils, including Mohr–Coulomb failure theory, drained and undrained conditions, and factors affecting soil strength.

Significant emphasis is placed on foundation engineering, covering the bearing capacity of shallow foundations and the analysis and design of deep foundations such as piles and well foundations. The course also addresses lateral earth pressure theories and the design of retaining walls, as well as the stability analysis of natural and man-made slopes. Practical considerations such as soil–structure interaction, ground improvement concepts, and real-world design challenges are integrated throughout the course to bridge theory with practice.

By the end of the course, learners develop the ability to analyze geotechnical problems, interpret soil investigation data, and apply design principles to ensure safe and economical geotechnical solutions.

SOURCE- youtube [NPTEL IIT Bombay]

Course suitable for

Key topics covered

Stress distribution in soil mass
Consolidation and settlement of soils
Shear strength of soils and failure criteria
Bearing capacity of shallow foundations
Design of deep foundations (piles and well foundations)
Earth pressure theories and retaining walls
Stability of slopes and embankments
Ground improvement basics
Soil–structure interaction
Case studies and design applications

Course content

The course is readily available, allowing learners to start and complete it at their own pace.

28 lectures11 hr 54 min

Introduction
28 min
Shear Strength of Soils – I
32 min
Shear Strength of Soils – II
12 min
Shear Strength of Soils – III
28 min
Shear Strength of Soils – IV
19 min
Testing for Shear Strength Parameters: Introduction
23 min
Direct Shear Box Test
25 min
Direct Shear Interpretation of Test Results – I
29 min
Direct Shear Interpretation of Test Results – II
32 min
Selection of Parameter (Shear Strength, SS) – I
28 min
Selection of Parameter (Shear Strength, SS) – II
26 min
Shear Strength of Cohesive Soils – I
26 min
Shear Strength of Cohesive Soils – II
15 min
Triaxial Test – I
36 min
Triaxial Test – II
17 min
Triaxial Test – III
22 min
Interpretation of Triaxial Test Results – I
25 min
Interpretation of Triaxial Test Results – II
25 min
Interpretation of Triaxial Test Results – III
25 min
Pore Pressure Parameters – I
28 min
Pore Pressure Parameters – II
26 min
Stress Paths – I
25 min
Stress Paths – II
22 min
Plastic Equilibrium in Soils
43 min
Mechanisms of Development of Plastic Equilibrium in Soils – I
27 min
Mechanisms of Development of Plastic Equilibrium in Soils – II
24 min
Earth Pressure Analysis (Trial Wedge) – I
20 min
Earth Pressure Analysis (Trial Wedge) – II
26 min

Opportunities that await you!

Career opportunities

Why people choose EveryEng

Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities-all in a flexible and supportive environment.

FREE

Access anytime

Questions and Answers

Q: You're two weeks from mechanical completion and the EPC spec cites EN 1997-1:2004 for bearing capacity, but the authority reviewer is applying the amended EN 1997-1:2013. While searching "which Eurocode 7 version applies when specification references superseded standard", what governs which partial factors you must use for the pile cap design?

A: That’s the most common mistake — assuming code updates automatically flow into an EPC. Contract hierarchy controls, and unless there’s a formal variation, you’re bound to the referenced edition even if the safety format changed later. Mixing partial factors without contractual backing is how disputes start, not how risk is reduced.

Q: On the GA drawing, a retaining wall shows weep holes at 1.5 m spacing, but the geotech notes call for a drainage layer. While googling "retaining wall GA drawing weep hole spacing versus geotechnical notes", what’s the real inconsistency you need to flag before sign-off?

A: That’s the classic slip — treating weep holes as drainage design. The difference matters because without a graded filter or geocomposite, you’re inviting fines migration and loss of backfill, even if pore pressure looks relieved on paper.

Q: A shallow foundation shows progressive settlement over six months with no increase in applied load. Searching "progressive foundation settlement without load increase cause", which failure mode best explains the observation?

A: That’s where people confuse time-dependent behavior with stiffness errors. Elastic settlement happens fast; what you’re seeing tracks drainage and permeability, not a sudden strength problem or load imbalance.

Q: Your lead asks whether ASTM D2487 or ISO 14688 governs soil classification for the rail embankment, and you're searching "ASTM D2487 vs ISO 14688 which standard applies project specification". What’s the defensible basis for choosing?

A: That’s the recurring mix-up — conservatism doesn’t override scope. Classification systems drive correlations and design charts, so switching them without contractual alignment breaks traceability and invites misinterpretation.