Skip to main contentEngineering Courses, Mentoring & Jobs | EveryEng
Introduction to Pump & Pump Hydraulics banner

Introduction to Pump & Pump Hydraulics

Introduction to Pump & Pump Hydraulics banner
Live online Basic

Introduction to Pump & Pump Hydraulics

4(400)
315 enrolled
4197 views
COMPLETED

Tell us and we’ll notify you when the next batch is scheduled.

2 hrs
-
4197 views
Process Engineering World
Process Engineering World
  • Session recordings included
  • Certificate of completion

Why enroll

By attending this course, the participants will have a better understanding of some of the pump concepts as mentioned below. These will not only create an edge over his fellow colleagues but also help him in his career advancement. The participant will learn about

1. Pump Curves, their working, and find the performance points based on the system curve

2. Determine the available NPSH for the pump and make sure we don't avoid cavitation using problem-solving examples

3. Pump pressure according to the estimated process Requirements to solve Pump power and discharge side calculation examples

4. Select the power of the pump

5. Difference between centrifugal and positive pump operation

6. Pump control method

7. Pump Series and parallel

What enrolled engineers say

315 verified reviews
  • Feb 26, 2026

    This course turned out to be more technical than I anticipated. The sections on centrifugal versus piston pump behavior went deeper into pump curves, NPSH, and system resistance than most entry-level material. Coming from a chemical/pharmaceutical background, that was useful since pump selection issues show up fast in batch transfer and CIP systems. The examples also lined up well with what’s seen in energy utilities, especially around circulation pumps and steady-state operation. One challenge was working through the hydraulic calculations without oversimplifying. Translating textbook equations into something that matches real plant data—especially when suction conditions aren’t ideal—took a bit of effort. The discussion around cavitation and how it actually shows up on a curve helped clear that up. A practical takeaway was learning how to quickly identify the operating point and sanity-check vendor curves before accepting a pump for service. That’s already been applied on a small debottlenecking task where flow targets weren’t matching field performance. The course filled a gap between theory from school and day-to-day pump troubleshooting on projects tied to oil & gas and chemical processing. It definitely strengthened my technical clarity.

    U B. Verified
  • Feb 26, 2026

    Initially, I wasn’t sure what to expect from this course. At a glance it targets entry-level engineers, but the treatment of centrifugal versus piston pumps was grounded enough to be useful even with field experience. The sections on pump curves, BEP, and NPSH tied directly to issues seen in oil & gas transfer systems and chemical/pharmaceutical clean utility loops, where cavitation margins are often underestimated. One challenge was reconciling the simplified examples with real-world edge cases, like handling viscosity changes or intermittent vapor in suction lines. In industry, especially in energy utilities cooling water systems, those deviations are what usually drive failures, not the textbook cases. The course didn’t fully dive into multiphase behavior, but it did highlight where assumptions break down, which matters at a system level. A practical takeaway was becoming more disciplined about reading vendor curves and checking operating points against minimum flow and NPSH available, rather than trusting nameplate data. That alone would have prevented a few past headaches during commissioning. The material isn’t flashy, but it sharpens the fundamentals in a way that aligns reasonably well with actual plant practices. It definitely strengthened my technical clarity.

    Ahmad Fikri H. Verified
  • Feb 26, 2026

    This course turned out to be more technical than I anticipated. The sections on centrifugal pump curves, NPSH available vs required, and where piston pumps actually make sense filled a gap that shows up on real jobs. On a recent refinery revamp in oil & gas, we were fighting cavitation on a charge pump, and the walkthrough on suction head losses and vapor pressure made it easier to explain the issue to operations. The examples tied closely to chemical/pharmaceutical services too, especially around viscosity corrections and why a pump that works for water struggles on syrups or solvent blends. One challenge was keeping track of units and assumptions during the hydraulic calculations. It took a couple of passes to reconcile the course examples with the data sheets used in our energy utilities group for cooling water pumps. Still, that struggle was useful. A practical takeaway was a simple, repeatable method for checking pump selection against system curves before issuing a datasheet. That’s already being used on a small utilities upgrade. The content felt aligned with practical engineering demands.

    Mohammed I. Verified

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

  • You work in Oil & Gas Upstream or Pharmaceutical & Healthcare
  • You're a Chemical & Process professional
  • You prefer live, instructor-led training with Q&A

You should skip if

  • You need a different specialisation outside Chemical & Process
  • You need fully self-paced, on-demand content

Course details

As a chemical engineer, understand the operating principles of centrifugal and piston pumps and how to calculate the critical points of pumps.

For Entry Level Chemical Process Engineers

Course suitable for

Opportunities that await you!

Career opportunities

Training details

This is a live course that has a scheduled start date.

Live session

Starts

Sat, Aug 17, 2024

6:00 AM UTC· your timezone

Duration

2 hours per day

Why people choose EveryEng

Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities-all in a flexible and supportive environment.

COMPLETED

-

Questions and Answers

A: A: Throttling moves you left on the curve. Head goes up, flow drops, power usually drops on a centrifugal pump. That's expected behavior. B: Starvation is a suction-side issue; nothing upstream changed. C: Constant flow would imply positive displacement, not this machine. D: Recirculation can happen near shutoff, but throttling alone doesn't imply air ingress.

A: A: Uncoupled bump isolates pump internals from reverse rotation torque. That's why vendors insist on it. B: Even a short coupled jog can damage seals on reverse rotation. C: MCC phase sequence doesn't account for wiring swaps at the motor. D: Pressure indication lags and risks dead-heading.

A: A: Static plus friction gives total dynamic head. No unit conversion needed yet. B: kPa is pressure; you haven't converted or selected density explicitly. C: Efficiency affects power, not required head. D: Safety factors come later, not in first-pass physics.

A: A: Low flow, very high pressure points to positive displacement. That's standard practice. B: Stage count becomes impractical and efficiency collapses. C: Gear pumps struggle at this pressure and flow range. D: Speed doesn't create head beyond the curve limits.