MEP Design - HVAC, Fire Fighting, Plumbing, Electrical
- 7-day money-back guarantee
- Session recordings included
- Certificate of completion
Why enroll
Your instructor
Sajjad Ansari
MEP Project Engineer & Professional Trainer
Is this course for you?
You should take this if
- You work in HVAC or Infrastructure & Construction
- You're a Mechanical Engineering / Electrical Engineering professional
- You have 3+ years of hands-on experience in this field
- You want to build skills in CAD Modelling
You should skip if
- You're new to this field with no prior experience
- You need a different specialisation outside Mechanical Engineering
- You need fully self-paced, on-demand content
Course details
Course suitable for
Key topics covered
Opportunities that await you!
Skills & tools you'll gain
Career opportunities
Training details
This is a live course that has a scheduled start date.
Why people choose EveryEng
Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities-all in a flexible and supportive environment.
What learners say about this course
Gave me a sharper vocabulary for design reviews, though module 2 dragged a bit and the quizzes assume you’ve already got NFPA tables bookmarked. Past that, it was practical. As a freelancer, I care about getting calcs right without babysitting them in prod. The walkthrough in Chapter 5 where they hand-calc a looped grid, then sanity-check it against software stuck. Seeing the Hazen-Williams assumptions called out, not hand-waved. The standpipe section tying residual pressure back to pump selection helped me clean up a PR comment the same week. Coverage leans sprinkler-heavy; I wished for five more minutes on mixed-use infra. still, the back third tightens up fast and spends time where reviews actually get contentious.
This course doesn’t assume you need hand-holding, which I liked since I’m usually flipping between calc sheets and prod work. The chapter on looped systems stuck with me, especially the walk-through where he balances a three-node loop and checks the most remote head after adding equivalent length for fittings. That mirrors how I actually sanity-check sprinkler calcs before a PR, and it shaved time the next time I had to review a submittal for a mixed sprinkler/standpipe job. Wasn’t sold on the pacing in the standpipe section; I wished there was a bit more on combined demand cases and how folks reconcile hand calcs with software outputs. still, the friction loss examples felt grounded, not academic, and the hvacr crossover notes helped frame why certain assumptions keep showing up. I’ve been doing these calcs for a while, but it finally clicked why the numbers land where they do under the hood.
Reads like margin notes from someone who’s been through late-night revisions and redlines, not a sales pitch. As a TeamLead, I’m thinking about how fast juniors can get useful in the repo, and this mostly helps; the habits map well to how we review PRs and keep arch decisions boring so prod doesn’t wobble. The bit that stuck was Chapter 6 on layer standards and blocks, especially the moment he fixes a return-air tag that breaks xrefs across sheets and shows why naming upfront saves hours later. I wasn’t sold on the short AutoCAD UI tour, and I wished there was a little more on coordinating with energyutilities constraints, but the tradeoffs were explained. mostly the pacing works, and I’ve already folded a few checks into our informal CI for drawings. It nudged me past a plateau I’d been circling without adding infra bloat or extra cost.
Chapter 5 duct layer naming saved rework across arch handoffs; it's mostly practical, though I wasn't sold on the block library choices.