Piping Material Engineering | EveryEng

Skip to main content

Self-paced Beginner

Piping Material Engineering

3(13)

5 enrolled

3094 views

₹ 10500

484 min

Anytime

English

3094 views

Team Piping Materials Engineering

Oil & Gas Upstream

Pharmaceutical & Healthcare

7-day money-back guarantee
Lifetime access
Certificate of completion

Volume pricing for groups of 5+

Why enroll

Career Advancement: To enhance their professional profile and open up new opportunities in piping design engineering (especially piping material related activities), and procurement roles.
Industry Relevance: To gain specialized knowledge of Piping material that is highly valued in sectors like oil & gas, petrochemicals, power, and infrastructure.
Understanding Standards: To develop a solid understanding of key industry codes and standards such as ASME, ASTM, API, and ISO.
Material Selection Expertise: To learn how to select suitable piping materials based on process conditions, temperature, pressure, and corrosion factors.
Project Execution Skills: To acquire skills in preparing Material Requisitions (MR), Technical Bid Evaluations (TBE), and Material Take-Offs (MTO).
Procurement & Inspection Knowledge: To understand the technical aspects of procurement, vendor evaluation, and material inspection processes.
Cross-Functional Skills: To bridge the gap between engineering, procurement, and construction functions in project environments.
Real-World Application: To apply theoretical knowledge to real-world projects through case studies, practical examples, and industry scenarios.

What enrolled engineers say

6 verified reviews

May 3, 2026
Bridges legacy plant habits with modern infra nicely; the ASME B31.3 material selection table walk-through in Chapter 4 stuck, especially the carbon steel vs SS callouts for oilgas lines. it's mostly beginner-friendly, but I wasn't sold on the brief corrosion allowance calc—I've wanted more worked examples tied to prod constraints and PR checklists.
ISHAYA A. Verified
May 3, 2026
mostly pragmatic for beginners; the Chapter 4 flange rating example at 400°F using ASME B16.5 stuck, especially the misstep callout on temp derating. It's context for infra and oilgas work, though I wasn't sold on the treatment of corrosion allowance calcs in Section 5.1 and wished there'd be more on vendor data in prod handoff.
Manthan S. Verified
May 3, 2026
Was looking for ways to tighten our materials workflow without slowing reviews, and this mostly fit that gap. The section on ASME B31.3 where they walk through allowable stress vs temperature, then check a 400°F flange rating, stuck with me. I've already used it when reviewing a PR on piping specs tied to prod changes in oil & gas; it's faster to sanity-check selections against the arch. wasn't sold on the lighter corrosion coverage, but the handling of odd edge cases is where it clicks.
karthik K. · Stress lead Engineer Verified

Your instructor

Team Piping Materials Engineering

Piping Material Engineer

India

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

You work in Oil & Gas Upstream or Pharmaceutical & Healthcare
You're a Piping & Layout Engineering / Metallurgy & Material Science professional
You prefer self-paced learning you can revisit

You should skip if

You need a different specialisation outside Piping & Layout Engineering
You need live interaction with an instructor

Course details

The objective of the Piping Material Engineering course is to equip engineers and technical professionals with comprehensive knowledge and practical skills related to the selection, specification, and management of piping materials used in industrial projects.

This course aims to build a strong foundation in material science, corrosion mechanisms, applicable codes and standards (such as ASME, ASTM, API), and the mechanical and chemical properties of materials relevant to the oil & gas, petrochemical, power, and process industries.

Through this course, participants will learn how to evaluate material compatibility with process conditions, including temperature, pressure, and corrosive environments. The course covers the classification and application of various piping materials (metals and non-metals) and piping components. Emphasis is placed on developing skills in preparing Material Requisitions (MR), Technical Bid Evaluations (TBE), and Material Take-Offs (MTO), along with understanding procurement processes and basic material inspection requirements.

By the end of the course, learners will be able to make informed decisions that ensure safety, compliance, cost-effectiveness, and long-term reliability of piping systems. The course is designed to benefit professionals involved in piping design, engineering, procurement, construction (EPC), and maintenance activities across various industrial sectors. Piping Material Engineering is a specialized course that focuses on the selection, specification, and application of materials used in piping systems across industries such as oil & gas, petrochemical, power, and chemical processing.

The course covers material properties, corrosion mechanisms, piping components and relevant international codes and standards (ASME, ASTM, API). Students learn to prepare Piping Material Specifications (PMS), Material Requisitions (MR), Technical Bid Evaluations (TBE), and Material Take-Offs (MTO), along with gaining insights into procurement and inspection processes.

This course equips professionals with the knowledge to ensure safe, cost-effective, and durable piping systems in various industrial environments.

Course suitable for

Key topics covered

Responsibilities of a Piping Material Engineer
Wall Thickness Calculation, Pressure Rating
Different Materials Used in Piping
Piping Material Specification (PMS)
Details of Different Types of Valves and Their Applications
Valve Material Specification (VMS)
Overview of Different Codes and Standards
Applicability of Various ASME, API, ASTM Codes
End Connection of Components
Standard and Special Parts Used in Piping
Material Take Off (MTO)
Overview of Procurement Cycle of Piping Components
Project Activities & Workflow related to Piping Material Engineering
Piping Specialty Items

Course content

The course is readily available, allowing learners to start and complete it at their own pace.

10 lectures8 hr 4 min

Wall thickness calculation for Process Piping & Pressure ratings
28 min
Branch Reinforcement
36 min
Different Material used in piping
66 min
Line List, Piping Class Nomenclature
51 min
Branch Table
48 min
Details of different types of valves and their applications
57 min
Destructive examination
63 min
Code and standards
56 min
Procurement Cycle of Piping Component
35 min
Piping Speciality Items
44 min

Opportunities that await you!

Career opportunities

✎ Where this fits — what comes before, what comes next

₹10500

Access anytime

Questions and Answers

Q: You're reviewing a rev 4 P&ID during an HSE walkdown and searching "ASME piping class mismatch between P&ID and GA drawing". The P&ID shows a 6" line classed as ANSI 300 CS, while the GA drawing tags the same line as ANSI 150 CS upstream of the separator inlet nozzle. No MOC is logged. What’s the highest-risk interpretation?

A: Acting on the wrong assumption here risks a pressure-containing failure under normal operation, which is exactly what inspectors look for. The safest reading is that one document is incorrect and the physical installation may not match the design pressure basis. Treating it as a harmless documentation lag or a benign down-rating ignores the absence of an MOC and bypasses pressure integrity checks tied to the separator MAWP.

Q: While preparing an MR, you google "calculate corrosion allowance for carbon steel piping oil and gas". A carbon steel line will see internal corrosion at 0.15 mm/year with a 20-year design life. Code minimum thickness is already satisfied. What corrosion allowance should be specified?

A: Understating corrosion allowance leads to early wall loss and a failed thickness inspection well before design life. Multiplying the given corrosion rate by the full design life and adding a small margin aligns with how inspectors expect the number to be justified. Blanket standards or optimistic rounding don’t tie back to the stated corrosion data.

Q: Operations report higher-than-expected pressure drop after switching to a higher CO2 wellstream, and you're searching "effect of CO2 on carbon steel piping pressure drop". Flow rate and temperature are unchanged. What’s the most defensible first response from a materials perspective?

A: Ignoring material-related effects can leave active wall loss or scaling undetected, leading to leaks or rupture. Higher CO2 increases corrosion risk and can form iron carbonate scale, both of which change internal roughness and diameter. Adjusting valves or blaming controls treats the symptom, not the cause.

Q: During a shutdown, UT shows localized thinning downstream of a control valve. You search "erosion corrosion downstream of control valve carbon steel". The rest of the line is within limits. What root cause best fits all observations?

A: Misidentifying this as uniform corrosion delays targeted fixes and allows rapid metal loss to continue. The localized nature, position downstream of a valve, and service conditions point to erosion-corrosion where velocity and turbulence peak. Other options explain some damage types but don’t match the spatial pattern.