Skip to main contentEngineering Courses, Mentoring & Jobs | EveryEng
Piping Material Engineering_September 2024 Batch banner

Piping Material Engineering_September 2024 Batch

Piping Material Engineering_September 2024 Batch banner
Live online Basic

Piping Material Engineering_September 2024 Batch

4(63)
3 enrolled
2035 views
COMPLETED

Tell us and we’ll notify you when the next batch is scheduled.

24 hrs
-
2035 views
Team Piping Engineering
Team Piping EngineeringFounder Team Piping Engineering
  • 7-day money-back guarantee
  • Session recordings included
  • Certificate of completion

Why enroll

  1. Comprehensive Understanding: Participants will gain an in-depth knowledge of piping engineering, covering design principles, material specifications, and industry standards comprehensively.

  2. Practical Skills: The course includes hands-on learning with real-world examples and case studies, enabling participants to apply theoretical knowledge to practical scenarios effectively.

  3. Industry-Relevant Insights: Learn about the latest trends, technologies, and best practices in piping engineering, making participants valuable assets to their organizations.

  4. Enhanced Problem-Solving Abilities: Develop advanced skills to diagnose and solve piping design and material specification issues, improving system efficiency and reliability.

  5. Career Advancement: Enhance your professional profile with specialized knowledge and skills in piping engineering, opening up opportunities for career growth in engineering design and project management.

What enrolled engineers say

5 verified reviews
  • Feb 25, 2026

    Initially, I wasn’t sure what to expect from this course. The content quickly moved beyond textbook piping and into how material decisions actually play out on oil & gas and chemical/pharmaceutical projects. Coverage of ASME B31.3 wall thickness calculations and valve selection felt grounded in real design cases, including corrosion allowance and temperature edge cases that are often glossed over. The section on jacketed piping was particularly relevant to pharma service, where cleanability and thermal control drive material choices more than pressure alone. One challenge was keeping track of overlapping codes, client specs, and vendor practices. Reconciling course examples with what EPC contractors typically allow versus owner standards took some effort, especially around special items and sour service materials in oil & gas. That friction was useful, though—it mirrored actual project confusion. A practical takeaway was the structured approach to piping line lists and the enquiry process. Seeing how early material decisions affect procurement lead times, maintenance, and long-term integrity tied the technical details into a system-level view. Compared to industry norms, this course was more explicit about those downstream impacts. I can see this being useful in long-term project work.

    Kishore M. Verified
  • Feb 25, 2026

    Initially, I wasn’t sure what to expect from this course. The content turned out to be fairly aligned with day‑to‑day piping material work, especially for oil & gas and chemical/pharmaceutical facilities. The sessions on ASME B31.3 wall thickness calculations and corrosion allowance were handled with enough depth to reflect how they’re actually applied on projects, not just textbook math. Valve selection discussions were also useful, particularly when comparing class ratings versus real operating envelopes in hydrocarbon service. One area that stood out was jacketed piping. It’s often glossed over in industry, but here the edge cases—thermal expansion, leakage paths, and maintenance access—were addressed in a practical way. That directly connects to pharma utilities where heat transfer and cleanliness drive material decisions differently than in upstream oil & gas. A challenge was keeping pace during the codes and standards section, since interpretations can vary between EPC practices and owner specs. Some examples required cross-checking with current project experience to fully land. A practical takeaway was structuring piping line lists to flag material exceptions early, which helps avoid late-stage MOC issues and system-level rework. Overall, it felt grounded in real engineering practice.

    said H. · piping Verified
  • Feb 25, 2026

    Initially, I wasn’t sure what to expect from this course, given I’ve already been working on piping packages for oil & gas projects. The content went deeper than expected, especially around material specifications and how they tie back to ASME B31.3 and project-specific specs. Topics like valve selection logic, corrosion allowance, and wall thickness calculations were directly relevant to issues faced on a brownfield revamp I’m currently supporting. Coverage of jacketed piping and special materials was useful from a chemical/pharmaceutical angle, where cleanliness, SS 316L selection, and utility segregation really matter. One challenge during the course was keeping pace with the codes discussion, especially when switching between oil & gas practices and pharma-driven requirements, but the examples helped bridge that gap. A practical takeaway was the structured way to build and review a piping line list and enquiry documents. That’s something already applied on a live RFQ, reducing back-and-forth with vendors. The course filled a gap between design theory and day-to-day engineering decisions. I can see this being useful in long-term project work.

    sarath S. · Offshore Construction Engineer Verified

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

  • You work in Oil & Gas Upstream or Pharmaceutical & Healthcare
  • You're a Piping & Layout Engineering / Metallurgy & Material Science professional
  • You prefer live, instructor-led training with Q&A

You should skip if

  • You need a different specialisation outside Piping & Layout Engineering
  • You need fully self-paced, on-demand content

Course details

To equip participants with a comprehensive understanding of piping design, material specifications, and industry standards, enabling them to effectively design, analyze, and manage piping systems in various industrial applications.

This course covers essential aspects of piping engineering, including component identification, valve selection, wall thickness calculations, adherence to codes and standards, material specifications, special parts, and detailed procedures for jacketed piping, piping line lists, and the enquiry process. Gain practical knowledge and skills through a structured syllabus that bridges theoretical concepts with real-world applications.

Course suitable for

Opportunities that await you!

Career opportunities

Training details

This is a live course that has a scheduled start date.

Live session

Starts

Sat, Sep 7, 2024

3:30 PM UTC· your timezone

Duration

2 hours per day

12 days total

Why people choose EveryEng

Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities-all in a flexible and supportive environment.

What learners say about this course

Kapil Saini
Kapil Saini Piping Engineer
May 3, 2026

Felt like the instructor had already slammed into the same walls my team’s about to hit on a refinery revamp, and saved us a few bruises. From a TeamLead angle, it framed layout choices in terms of downstream rework and ops pain, not just drawings, which helps when you’re juggling infra decisions and schedule risk. The section on pump suction routing in Module 3, especially the NPSH check tied to that offset elbow example, stuck because it mirrors the comments I see show up late in PR-style design reviews. mostly wished there was more time on pipe rack congestion tradeoffs under brownfield constraints; that’s where we bleed hours in prod. Cost-wise, it wasn’t fluffy, and I could justify letting two juniors take it instead of shadowing seniors for weeks. It’s lingered longer than most courses I squeeze between meetings.

phanindra perumalla
phanindra perumalla Piping Engineer
May 3, 2026

Hit a conceptual ceiling on piping basics—this broke it without fluff. The ASME B31.3 Chapter 3 segment where they walk an allowable stress calc with temperature derating and corrosion allowance stuck, especially the table callouts. I've already pushed a PR in our infra repo to encode similar checks for prod; it's shaping the arch and CI gates, though I wasn't sold on the short oilgas history and wished there was more on line class change control. it's translating cleanly into how we guard our codebase.

guru prasad
guru prasad Sr. Piping Design Engineer
May 3, 2026

Used this to sanity-check assumptions our team had locked in on a brownfield revamp. Quick gripe first: module 4 on supports dragged, and the labs assume you’ve already got your CAD templates dialed in. After that, it clicked. The pump suction piping section where they walk through NPSH checks and nozzle orientation stuck with me; that example maps cleanly to oilgas work we’re doing now. I liked how decisions were traced back to constraints, not rules-of-thumb. Feels like reviewing a clean PR: fewer slides, more why. It helped me tighten a layout before it hit prod review, fewer back-and-forths with mech and stress. examples sit at a useful complexity level, not watered down.

man try
man try
May 3, 2026

The Chapter 4 piping specs walkthrough—editing a valve catalog then watching the model update, stuck; seeing clashes resolve in the 3D view felt like real plant arch work. It's mostly practical, but I wasn't sold on the admin setup bits; wished there was more on managing spec drift between dev/prod and fewer clicks called out.

COMPLETED

-

Questions and Answers

A: A: The arithmetic is fine, but piping specs rarely carry fractional CA; this misses the standard practice embedded in most B31.3 specs. B: Two-sided loss is a pressure design concept, not how corrosion rate is reported by inspection. C: This matches how CA is actually frozen in specs — calculated, then rounded up to a standard value that survives fabrication tolerances. D: There's no basis for doubling CA unless the corrosion rate itself is uncertain or episodic, which isn't stated.

A: A: Procurement logic, not contract logic; this shifts risk without authority. B: This is how contracts are enforced when edition dates aren't updated — ugly, but defensible. C: Jurisdictional adoption affects code compliance, not material procurement acceptance. D: Mill flexibility doesn't override a binding project spec, even if everyone wishes it did.

A: A: CA was invented for this exact slow, predictable loss mode. B: Pitting eats through wall locally; average allowance doesn't buy time where the pit forms. C: Erosion is still thickness loss over time, even if accelerated. D: Oxygen corrosion is ugly but still broadly uniform if exposure is global.

A: A: Coatings help general corrosion but don't stop sulfide stress risk if conditions drift. B: 304L is weak against chlorides; pitting risk shows up early. C: 316L buys some margin, but chloride plus H2S at temperature pushes it. D: Duplex handles chlorides and sulfide environments with far better resistance when properly heat treated.