Name: Welding WPS / PQR
Price: 399 INR
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.0 (53 reviews)

Live online Basic

Welding WPS / PQR

4(53)

1911 views

COMPLETED

Tell us and we’ll notify you when the next batch is scheduled.

2 hrs

English

1911 views

Chaitanya PurohitConsultant

Aerospace

Automotive

7-day money-back guarantee
Session recordings included
Certificate of completion

Volume pricing for groups of 5+

Why enroll

Understanding Welding Procedure Specification (WPS) and Procedure Qualification Record (PQR) can enhance your career in welding engineering and quality control, leading to roles like Welding Engineer, Quality Assurance Manager, or Certification Specialist, with median salaries ranging from $65,000 to over $110,000. You'll gain expertise to develop and implement WPS and PQR, ensuring compliance with industry standards and codes, and optimizing welding processes for industries like aerospace, energy, and heavy manufacturing, where precision and certification are critical.

Your instructor

Chaitanya Purohit

Founder

Consultant

31+ yrs experience·India

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

You work in Aerospace or Automotive
You're a Mechanical Engineering / Production Engineering professional
You prefer live, instructor-led training with Q&A

You should skip if

You need a different specialisation outside Mechanical Engineering
You need fully self-paced, on-demand content

Course details

This course provides a detailed exploration of Welding Procedure Specifications (WPS) and Procedure Qualification Records (PQR), focusing on their roles in ensuring consistent and high-quality welding practices. Students will learn how to develop, interpret, and apply WPS and PQR documents to meet industry standards and project requirements.

Course suitable for

Key topics covered

Opportunities that await you!

Career opportunities

Training details

This is a live course that has a scheduled start date.

Live session

Starts

Sun, Oct 27, 2024

6:00 AM UTC· your timezone

Duration

2 hours per day

COMPLETED

Questions and Answers

Q: You're asked on the shop floor to sanity-check heat input because the auditor is waiting; you Google "estimate welding heat input from amps volts travel speed WPS" and do a back-of-envelope using 24 V, 180 A, 300 mm/min for a GMAW fillet — what heat input order makes sense?

A: A would shrink the predicted HAZ unrealistically and mask hydrogen cracking risk, B drops efficiency and would push you to a non-conservative conclusion, C would flag burn-through and distortion that nobody is seeing, D follows V×I divided by speed with an efficiency term and matches observed bead profile.

Q: During PQR review for pressure piping you search "ASME Section IX essential variables change filler metal classification" after the vendor swapped ER70S-6 to ER70S-3 without requalification — what does Section IX logic push you to do?

A: A ignores how deoxidizer chemistry affects weld metal properties, B treats a procedural knob as a substitute for metallurgical control, C ties requalification to testing scope instead of variable status, D aligns with Section IX philosophy that certain changes always need fresh mechanical evidence.

Q: Homologation is tomorrow and you Google "select welding process for thick section low hydrogen requirement WPS" for a 40 mm structural joint with hydrogen cracking sensitivity — what process choice best fits?

A: A trades speed for hydrogen risk that DFMEA will flag, B uses an electrode type known for moisture sensitivity, C risks lack of fusion buried deep in the joint, D matches section thickness and hydrogen limits with a stable process window.

Q: You're checking a weld procedure because production says it's fine; you type "datasheet travel speed vs measured heat input mismatch WPS audit" after measuring slower travel than the WPS — what's the right engineering reaction?

A: A disconnects process control from actual thermal exposure, B bypasses the qualification basis, C relies on tribal knowledge instead of data, D ties measurement back to what was proven acceptable.