Name: NDT ( PT ) Level II
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.0 (53 reviews)

Live online Beginner

NDT ( PT ) Level II

4(53)

492 views

COMPLETED

2 hrs

Next month

English

492 views

Chaitanya PurohitConsultant

Aerospace

Automotive

7-day money-back guarantee
Session recordings included
Certificate of completion

Volume pricing for groups of 5+

Why enroll

Achieving NDT (PT) Level II certification can significantly enhance your career in non-destructive testing, leading to roles like Senior NDT Technician, Quality Control Inspector, or Testing Engineer, with median salaries ranging from $70,000 to over $120,000. With this advanced certification, you'll demonstrate expertise in penetrant testing, enabling you to interpret codes, standards, and procedures, and to supervise and train others. This certification will also open up opportunities for leadership roles, consulting, and specialized inspection services, making you a highly respected and sought-after professional in industries like aerospace, energy, and manufacturing.

Your instructor

Chaitanya Purohit

Founder

Consultant

31+ yrs experience·India

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

You work in Aerospace or Automotive
You're a Mechanical Engineering / Metallurgy & Material Science professional
You prefer live, instructor-led training with Q&A

You should skip if

You need a different specialisation outside Mechanical Engineering
You need fully self-paced, on-demand content

Course details

This course offers an in-depth exploration of Penetrant Testing (PT), a widely used non-destructive testing (NDT) method for detecting surface-breaking defects in materials. Designed for those aiming to achieve Level II certification in PT, the course covers the principles, techniques, and applications of PT, including advanced procedures and quality control measures.

Course suitable for

Opportunities that await you!

Career opportunities

Training details

This is a live course that has a scheduled start date.

COMPLETED

Coming in Next Month

Questions and Answers

Q: You're preparing a visible dye penetrant test and searching "penetrant dwell time calculation for PT Level II aluminum casting". The procedure states a minimum dwell of 10 minutes at 20°C. The shop temperature is 12°C. Using the common linear correction of +1 minute per 5°C drop, what dwell time do you apply?

A: Option A feels tidy but only adds two minutes for a 10°C drop, not the actual 8°C reduction. Option C is a classic over-application—developer time isn't part of penetrant dwell correction. Option D sounds safety-driven, but it's inventing a roughness factor that isn't in the written procedure, which breaks compliance. The linear correction gives 10 min + (8/5 ≈ 1.6, rounded up to 2) = 14 minutes.

Q: During procedure review you google "best penetrant type for PT Level II inspection on stainless steel welds". The welds are austenitic SS, ground flush, and will be post-cleaned before service. Which penetrant family fits best?

A: Option A works on smooth parts but risks background on weld toes. Option C is valid in immersion lines, not hand-applied weld inspection. Option D exists in catalogs but sacrifices sensitivity and control. Fluorescent solvent-removable penetrant gives higher flaw contrast on stainless welds when UV is available.

Q: You're stuck on "how to read PT inspection symbols on fabrication drawing Level II". The drawing note reads: "PT per ASTM E1417, Type I, Method C, Level 2." What does this specify?

A: Option B swaps Type I and Type II, a frequent memory slip. Option C gets Type I right but Method A, not C. Option D matches Method C but misses that Type I is fluorescent, not visible. ASTM E1417 coding locks Type I to fluorescent and Method C to solvent removable.

Q: On the shop floor you're searching "PT Level II pre-cleaning verification steps before penetrant application". The component is carbon steel with light oil residue. What do you verify before applying penetrant?

A: Option A ignores embedded oils that kill capillary action. Option B matters, but temperature limits don't fix contamination. Option D is a QA traceability check, not a pre-cleaning acceptance. Residual solvent or oil blocks penetrant entry, so evaporation and cleanliness are the gate.