Aerospace Engineering | EveryEng

Skip to main content

Self-paced Beginner

Aerospace Engineering

4(1579)

72 enrolled

2556 views

FREE

1043 min

Anytime

English

Team EveryEngMechanical Engineering

Chemical & Process

Lifetime access
Certificate of completion
Foundational Learning
Access to Study Materials

Volume pricing for groups of 5+

Why enroll

People enroll in an aerospace engineering course to learn how aircraft and spacecraft are designed and built. Many are motivated by a passion for aviation, space exploration, and advanced technology. The course also opens doors to careers in aerospace, defense, research, and other high-tech fields.

Your instructor

Team EveryEng

Engineer

Mechanical Engineering

22+ yrs experience·India

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

You work in Aerospace
You're a Chemical & Process / Mechanical Engineering professional
You prefer self-paced learning you can revisit

You should skip if

You need a different specialisation outside Chemical & Process
You need live interaction with an instructor

Course details

The aerospace engineering course focuses on the design, development, testing, and maintenance of aircraft, spacecraft, missiles, and related systems. It covers core subjects such as aerodynamics, propulsion, flight mechanics, structures, materials, avionics, and control systems, along with strong foundations in mathematics, physics, and computer programming. Students gain both theoretical knowledge and practical skills through laboratory work, simulations, projects, and internships, preparing them to solve complex engineering problems. The course trains graduates for careers in aviation, space research, defense, manufacturing, and emerging aerospace technologies.

Source: nptelhrd (Youtube Channel)
Aerospace Propulsion by Dr. P.A. Ramakrishna,Department of Aerospace Engineering, IIT Madras

Course suitable for

Key topics covered

Introduction to aerospace engineering
Aerodynamics and aerothermodynamics
Aircraft and spacecraft design
Propulsion systems (airbreathing and rocket engines)
Control and guidance systems
Structures and materials
Aerospace systems and performanc

Course content

The course is readily available, allowing learners to start and complete it at their own pace.

20 lectures17 hr 23 min

Opportunities that await you!

Career opportunities

FREE

Access anytime

Questions and Answers

Q: You're reviewing an AOG shipment and searching: "EN 10204 3.1 material certificate acceptability for aerospace MRO replacement part". The vendor supplied a 3.1 cert showing chemistry within spec on Cr and Ni, but Mo is at the upper tolerance edge. What drives whether you can release the part to service?

A: Installing on paperwork shortcuts can ground the aircraft later when audit findings hit, or worse, introduce untracked variability into a fatigue-critical area. EN 10204 exists to lock traceability and declared compliance to the purchase spec; a 3.1 cert is built for this exact case as long as the heat analysis stays inside limits and is traceable. Pushing to 3.2 or deferring verification confuses risk control with urgency and doesn't close the compliance loop.

Q: You're stuck on: "aerospace replacement fastener material substitution AOG decision". The original bolt is cadmium-plated alloy steel; the shipped replacement is zinc-nickel plated with identical strength class. What's the defensible selection logic?

Q: You're Googling: "stainless steel chloride stress corrosion cracking aircraft cabin environment". A replacement clamp shifts from 316L to 304L, both meeting tensile requirements. Cabin humidity peaks at 85% with periodic chloride contamination from cleaning agents. What's the dominant risk?

Q: You're checking: "bearing life calculation ISO 281 aerospace accessory gearbox". A bearing sees 12 kN radial load, 3 kN axial load, dynamic rating C = 95 kN, speed 6,000 rpm. Using ISO 281 with p = 3, what's the L10 life in millions of revolutions?

A: Underestimating life here pushes an accessory gearbox into premature removal and another AOG event. ISO 281 combines radial and axial components into an equivalent load before applying the cubic relationship; done correctly, the numbers land in the hundreds of millions of revolutions. Dropping loads or stacking extra factors that weren't specified skews the outcome toward unnecessary rejection.