Finite Element Analysis | EveryEng

Skip to main content

Self-paced Beginner

Finite Element Analysis

4(1581)

109 enrolled

3452 views

FREE

864 min

Anytime

English

3452 views

Team EveryEngMechanical Engineering

Lifetime access
Certificate of completion
Foundational Learning
Access to Study Materials

Volume pricing for groups of 5+

Why enroll

Participants join this course to gain practical skills in solving real-world engineering problems using simulation instead of costly physical testing. It helps them enhance their design accuracy, improve job opportunities, and build expertise in industry-relevant FEA tools.

Your instructor

Team EveryEng

Engineer

Mechanical Engineering

22+ yrs experience·India

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

You work in Aerospace or Automotive
You're a Mechanical Engineering professional
You prefer self-paced learning you can revisit

You should skip if

You need a different specialisation outside Mechanical Engineering
You need live interaction with an instructor

Course details

This course provides a comprehensive introduction to Finite Element Analysis (FEA), a powerful numerical method used to analyze complex engineering problems. It covers the fundamental principles of discretization, element types, and mesh generation used to model real-world structures and systems. Students will learn how to apply FEA techniques to evaluate stress, strain, deformation, and thermal behavior in components. The course also introduces material properties, boundary conditions, and loading scenarios essential for accurate simulations. Through hands-on exercises, participants will gain experience using industry-relevant FEA software tools. Emphasis is placed on interpreting simulation results and validating them against theoretical and experimental data. The course explores applications across mechanical, civil, and aerospace engineering domains. Advanced topics such as nonlinear analysis, dynamic simulations, and contact problems are also introduced. By the end of the course, learners will be able to build reliable models, run simulations, and make data-driven design decisions. This course is ideal for students and professionals aiming to enhance their engineering analysis and problem-solving skills.

Course suitable for

Key topics covered

Introduction to Finite Element Analysis
FEA Basics - Governing Differential Equations, Exact Solution and Weighted Residual Methods
Weighted Residual Methods - Galerkin, Petrov Galerkin, Subdomain, Least Square & collocation method
Shape function and Interpolation function for Cubic Bar Element
Truss analysis - example problem
Equations of Elasticity
2D Analysis - CST element, derivation of element stiffness
2D Analysis - 4 noded Rectangular element
Dynamic Analysis - Transverse Vibration of Beam
Dynamic Analysis - Axial Vibration of Rod - Example Problem

Course content

The course is readily available, allowing learners to start and complete it at their own pace.

29 lectures14 hr 24 min

Introduction to Finite Element Analysis
51 min
FEA Basics - Governing Differential Equations, Exact Solution and Weighted Residual Methods
49 min
Weighted Residual Methods - Galerkin, Petrov Galerkin, Subdomain, Least Square & collocation method
63 min
Rayleigh Ritz Method (RR Method)
35 min
Shape function and Interpolation function for Linear Bar Element
38 min
Shape function and Interpolation function for Quadratic Bar Element
34 min
Shape function and Interpolation function for Cubic Bar Element
33 min
Generation of Element Matrix Equation
63 min
1D Steady state Thermal Analysis
31 min
Truss Analysis - truss element derivation
20 min
Truss analysis - example problem
25 min
FEA - Beam Analysis example
17 min
Equations of Elasticity
38 min
Plane stress, plane strain & axisymmetric problems
26 min
2D Analysis - CST element, derivation of element stiffness
37 min
2D Analysis - CST element - example problem
11 min
2D Analysis - 4 noded Rectangular element
24 min
Lagrange and serendipity elements
24 min
2D Analysis - 4 Noded Quadrilateral element
29 min
2D analysis - Iso parametric elements
15 min
2D Analysis - Jacobian Matrix
32 min
2D Analysis - 8 noded and 9 noded Quadrilateral elements
36 min
2D Analysis - CST element in natural coordinates Part A
19 min
2D Analysis - CST element in natural coordinates Part B
20 min
2D Analysis - CST element example problem
21 min
2D Analysis - 4 Noded Quadrilateral element example problem
17 min
Dynamic Analysis - Axial Vibration of Rod
20 min
Dynamic Analysis - Transverse Vibration of Beam
16 min
Dynamic Analysis - Axial Vibration of Rod - Example Problem
20 min

Opportunities that await you!

Career opportunities

✎ Where this fits — what comes before, what comes next

FREE

Access anytime

Questions and Answers

Q: You're running a static linear FEA and notice peak von Mises stress jumps by ~12% after refining the mesh near a fillet; you google "mesh refinement stress keeps increasing FEA" while the test clock is ticking. What response actually moves you toward a defensible result?

A: The right move drives the solution toward mesh-independent behaviour while handling stress gradients correctly; locking the mesh freezes a non-converged answer, swapping element order hides the gradient instead of resolving it, and altering geometry invalidates correlation to the as-built part.

Q: A thin aluminium bracket sees bending-dominated loading with moderate curvature; you're searching "linear vs quadratic tetrahedral elements bending FEA" before committing the model. Which element choice best fits the duty?

A: The selected option balances accuracy in bending with practical meshing; linear tets are overly stiff in bending, membrane-only shells drop transverse shear and bending effects, and forced hex meshing can distort geometry and introduce new errors.

Q: Contact is defined with a penalty formulation in an implicit solver; you look up "penalty stiffness too high contact FEA convergence" after Newton iterations start oscillating. If penalty stiffness is set excessively high, what is the real downstream risk?

A: The correct outcome explains why the solver struggles numerically while altering global stiffness; low penalty stiffness causes penetration, frictional issues stem from coefficient choice not stiffness magnitude, and solvers don't silently change integration schemes.

Q: You're checking allowables against aerospace guidance and search "NASA STD 5001 safety factor yield ultimate FEA" to sanity-check margins. Why does the standard insist on separate factors for yield and ultimate?

A: The requirement distinguishes onset of permanent deformation from catastrophic failure; data quality alone doesn't drive the split, discretization error isn't handled via code factors, and reporting convenience isn't a design basis.