Skip to main contentEngineering Courses, Mentoring & Jobs | EveryEng
Mastering Chapter II & IX of ASME B31.3: A Practical Overview banner

Mastering Chapter II & IX of ASME B31.3: A Practical Overview

1 enrolled

Mastering Chapter II & IX of ASME B31.3: A Practical Overview banner
Live online Advanced

Mastering Chapter II & IX of ASME B31.3: A Practical Overview

4(31)
1 enrolled
2635 views
COMPLETED
10 hrs
Next month
English
Anindya Bhattacharya
Anindya BhattacharyaAsset Engineer
  • 7-day money-back guarantee
  • Session recordings included
  • Certificate of completion
Volume pricing for groups of 5+

Why enroll

This course will cover basic and advanced topics from Solid Mechanics required to provide a robust understanding of the background theory behind technical requirements of Piping and Pressure Vessel codes and standards. A refresher course on core and advanced topics of Solid mechanics required to understand technical background of Piping and Pressure Vessel codes and standards.

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

  • You work in Oil & Gas or Pharmaceutical & Healthcare
  • You're a Civil & Structural / Mechanical professional
  • You have 3+ years of hands-on experience in this field
  • You prefer live, instructor-led training with Q&A

You should skip if

  • You're new to this field with no prior experience
  • You need a different specialisation outside Civil & Structural
  • You need fully self-paced, on-demand content

Course details

This course provides a detailed overview of Chapter II and Chapter IX of the ASME B31.3 Process Piping Code, focusing on their key requirements and practical implications for piping design and analysis. Chapter II outlines the design conditions, material specifications, and stress criteria essential for safe and reliable piping systems, while Chapter IX specifically addresses high-pressure piping, including enhanced design rules, wall thickness considerations, and material selection for extreme service conditions.

Participants will gain a clear understanding of how these chapters interrelate, how the requirements are applied in real-world piping systems, and the engineering principles behind each provision.

Course suitable for

Key topics covered

1. The concepts of load and displacement driven stress- Concepts will be elucidated with real life examples.

2. Why separate allowables have seen set for load and displacement driven allowables? - Correlation with associated failure mechanisms.

3. The concepts of stress intensification and flexibility factors- Theoretical background.

4. An overview of Markl’s works- Historial background.

5. Recent challenges to Markl’s works- Work by Tony Paulin and Chris Hinnant.

6. How the issue of Creep has been addressed in B31.3? - With brief introduction to the topic of Creep.

7. Background to allowable stresses in B31.3- Theoretical background.

8. What are the significances of stress range reduction factor and weld joint strength reduction factor? – Theoretical background.

9. Design of high-pressure piping- equations, challenges and difference between Chapter IX and Chapter II of ASME B31.3 – Fundamental differences with associated background theory.

Opportunities that await you!

Career opportunities

Training details

This is a live course that has a scheduled start date.

COMPLETED

Coming in Next Month

Questions and Answers

Q: You're checking a vendor calc during HSE audit and you google "ASME B31.3 Chapter II pipe wall thickness calculation internal pressure example". A 6 in NPS seamless ASTM A106 Gr.B line, design pressure 9.5 MPa, design temperature 180°C, corrosion allowance 3.0 mm. Longitudinal joint factor E = 1.0, quality factor Y = 0.4. Allowable stress S at temp = 138 MPa. What minimum required wall thickness does B31.3 Eq. (3a) give before mill tolerance?

A: That’s the most common mistake — mixing where corrosion allowance enters the equation. B31.3 Eq. (3a) calculates pressure thickness t = (P·D)/(2(S·E + P·Y)). Plugging in gives about 5.6 mm for pressure containment. Corrosion allowance is then added explicitly, pushing it to roughly 8.6 mm. Embedding CA inside the formula or double-counting E quietly inflates thickness and triggers an unnecessary MOC under COMAH scrutiny.