Work with Sawrabh Raj
₹ 3000 / Hr
How You're Connected
See the shortest path between you and Sawrabh Raj through the EveryEng network.
No connection path found to this engineer.
Engineering breadth
Sawrabh Raj has demonstrated 0 skills across 0 engineering domains on EveryEng. Each ring shows how much of that domain's skill taxonomy Sawrabh covers — expand a domain to see specific skills and proficiency levels.
Sawrabh hasn't published a skill map yet — check back as their profile grows.
Courses
Courses Sawrabh Raj has authored or contributed to.
Instrumentation Design Engineering Career Path
Sawrabh Raj • E-Learning
Free
View CourseInstrumentation Design and Detailed Engineering Mastery
Sawrabh Raj • E-Learning
₹12,000
View CourseHow to Read Piping and Instrumentation Diagram(P&ID),PFD,BFD
Sawrabh Raj • E-Learning
₹499
View CourseArticles
Articles Sawrabh Raj has authored or contributed to.
Total Experience
15 Years
Current Company / College
Shanaya Training Institute Pvt Ltd
City
delhi
Country
India
Professional Experience
10+ Years - Instrumental Design Engineer
Professional Career Summary
ac
Reviews
Feedback from participants who've learned with Sawrabh Raj.
No fluff, good labs. The async and concurrency sections are the standout.
Kana Karmur
Manager
The control valve sizing chapter—example where Cv calc got revised after a noise spec, felt close to prod handoffs; it's familiar. Useful for day-to-day arch with infra teams; wasn't sold on the HART polling section, wished for more on SIL verification and PR-ready datasheets.
Sayanika Bandyopadhyay
Engineer
Needed to close some gaps in my arch thinking around instrumentation handoff to controls. Minor gripe first: module 4 on vendor datasheets dragged, and the labs assume you’ve already got a licensed CAD tool wired up. Past that, the material maps cleanly to real systems. The moment that stuck was Chapter 6’s loop diagram walkthrough using ISA S5.1 symbols, especially the RTD vs thermocouple wiring example and how it impacts failure modes and obs later. The discussion on marshalling cabinets tied back to infra decisions I see in prod, not just drawings. It reads like someone who’s reviewed a few painful PRs between electrical and software. already pulled a couple patterns into my repo and CI notes this week, mostly around tagging and change control.
Amal Krishna
Engineer
Grabbed it over a weekend and ended up finishing more than planned; the pacing didn't waste time. The section on 4–20 mA loop grounding, especially the worked example comparing single-point vs multi-point earths, stuck because it mirrored a field issue I'd seen. As a freelancer, I care about fixes landing fast, and mapping those instrumentation design checks to our repo and CI has already reduced prod noise and bad assumptions in the arch—it's practical. wasn't sold on the brief HART coverage; wished there was more on diagnostics and failure modes.
Came in to sanity-check it for L&D spend and ended up learning a few things I can use, especially where legacy plant habits meet newer arch thinking. The Chapter 6 valve sizing walk-through stuck: the Cv calc tied to a HART loop check, then a short failure mode note that mirrors what I've seen in electronics instrumentation reviews. It translates to prod constraints better than most courses; the worksheets in the repo map cleanly to a PR checklist, though I wasn't sold on the brief nod to obs and wished there was more on brownfield infra. got more out of this than the last couple conferences.
Ali Raza
Instrumentation engineer
This course tightened my language in design reviews; I stopped hand-waving and could point to the right artifacts fast. As a freelancer bouncing between clients, that matters more than theory, and it kept things moving from arch notes to PR comments. The section on impulse line routing and slope callouts stuck, especially the example where a 1:10 fall fixed a condensate trap issue I’ve seen in prod more than once. The thermowell wake frequency calc was useful too, even if I had to rewatch that bit between meetings. I wasn’t sold on the pacing in the control valve sizing chapter; it rushed past assumptions I’d want explicit in a repo README. Still, the tie-in from datasheets to loop diagrams to commissioning checks helped with obs later, not unlike tracing a flaky RPS graph in k8s. Not something I usually pass along, but I did send it to one client PM.
Sumant Kumar
instrument Engeneer
That jump from junior habits to senior thinking shows up fast here—less about formulas, more about assumptions that break infra in prod. The Chapter 2 walk-through of a 4–20 mA loop, especially the shield termination example where grounding both ends injects noise, stuck; the annotated diagram made the failure mode obvious and tied back to obs symptoms I've seen. wasn't sold on the quick pass over cable trays vs conduits, and I wished there was a bit more on labeling standards. Still, it probably saves a couple of bad nights chasing phantom RPS drops later.
Balaji Paskanti
Engineer
Chapter 3 on shield grounding (single-point vs multi)—bridged legacy oilgas habits to modern infra; it's practical, though wished more on tray derating.
bikash sahoo
--
Moves fast and skips the fluff you’ve already seen in school, which I liked. As a grad entrant trying to map theory to plant docs, the early contrast between BFD vs PFD vs P&ID landed quickly without dragging, and the ISA tag numbering rundown set context before symbols started flying. The moment that stuck was Chapter 3’s walk-through tracing a centrifugal pump from suction through the recycle line, calling out the check valve and PSV tie‑in; that’s the first time a crowded sheet felt readable. I’ve been comparing this to how we reason about arch and infra in prod, and the habit of following flow paths felt similar to debugging RPS drops via obs. wasn't sold on the brief pass over vendor legend differences, and I wished there was a short appendix on interlocks. Still, fewer sticky notes on my desk now, and when a P&ID shows up from an energy utilities repo, I’m not guessing at half the symbols anymore.
The material nudged my mental model of process diagrams; as a grad entrant, I thought I had the framework, but the PFD vs BFD comparison early on exposed gaps. The chapter on ISA tag numbering, especially the example breaking down “LIC-101” and how it maps to a control loop on the P&ID, stuck with me. Translating that to day-to-day felt practical—reading a vendor P&ID in an oilgas context, then mirroring signals in infra docs with repo notes and CI. wasn't sold on the brief interlocks coverage, but it's reduced back-and-forth before prod changes.
Purshottam Singh
Instrumentation designer
Wasn't expecting this level of technical granularity for a beginner P&ID class, especially given the title. The walkthrough in the “Valve Callouts and Line Specs” section where they decode 2"-CS-150# and then trace LIC‑101 from transmitter to final element stuck with me. It mapped cleanly to how I read arch diagrams in prod or skim a repo before a PR; different domain, same pattern recognition. Wasn't sold on the pacing of the BFD chapter and wished there was more on edge cases like exchanger bypasses and how ops actually mark redlines. For oilgas or energyutilities contexts, the pump‑around example and relief valve placement discussion felt grounded without drifting into theory. big win was realizing a few assumptions I’d been carrying from PFDs didn’t survive contact with an actual P&ID—closing a quiet gap between what I knew and what I thought I knew.
SHADAB RAZA KHAN
Instrumentation Engineer
Skips the hype and gets straight to what the diagrams actually do. Minor gripe first: the BFD module felt rushed, and the quiz jumps from symbols to flow logic a bit fast. Past that, it’s been useful as a bridge from legacy plant docs to how we talk about systems now. The section walking through a P&ID with pump P‑101, the control valve tag, and the ISA legend clicked, especially the moment where he explains why the bypass is drawn even when ops “never uses it.” I’ve already applied that when reading old energy utilities drawings and mapping them to infra diagrams in a repo. It's helped me stop arguing process arch by vibes and point to the page instead.
sarath Selvaraj
Piping Engineer
Career path was clear, wasn't fluff; the P&ID symbols module using a 4–20mA loop stuck, though I wished more on SIL calcs.
Brand Boone
Engineer
Pulled this in mainly for the DCS state handling module, since we’ve got junior folks touching arch decisions that bleed into infra and obs. The chapter walking through an ISA‑5.1 P&ID, specifically the FT‑101 to FIC‑101 loop example, stuck because it mirrors reviews I see in PRs for control logic docs. It’s mostly beginner‑friendly, though I wasn’t sold on how lightly CI and change control were handled for instrument data. I've already reused a few diagrams in team notes, which doesn’t happen often.
Dipankar Maity
Engineer
Dense, relevant content. The real-world examples made it stick.
Anup Kumar Dey
Owner of https://whatispiping.com/
Been around long enough to spot padding; there isn't much here. The control valve sizing chapter, where they walk a Cv calc and a fail-open vs fail-closed choice, stuck because it's the same tradeoff pressure we see before prod handoff. Useful for getting mech, elec, and controls on the same page during a PR-style review, saving infra churn on energy utilities work. wasn't sold on the quick pass over SIL/IEC 61511 and wished there was more worked math, but it's challenging and rewarding.
Niyati Gamare
Instrumentation detail engineering
Good grounding for beginners; the Module 3 P&ID walkthrough where a 4–20 mA pressure loop gets tagged and spec’d stuck, especially mapping transmitter ranges to alarm setpoints. Wasn't sold on the career advice segments, and there's room for more on ISA‑5.1 symbols, datasheet review, and handoff to infra teams in oilgas/energyutilities.
logeshwari Kamaraj
Engineer
The P&ID walkthrough in Module 3 where they map ISA tags to loop diagrams stuck; seeing FT-101 flow into a control valve calc felt close to a real PR. It's mostly beginner-friendly, but I wished there was more on control valve sizing math and infra/CI handoffs; I've used the tag conventions to clean a repo.
Muhammad Umair Khalid
Recent Mechanical Engineering graduate
Good bridge from beginner to intermediate; the Chapter 4 API 520 sizing walkthrough using steam vs liquid stuck, especially the set vs blowdown sketch. It helped me review PR selection before a prod change, but I wasn't sold on the quick PSV testing cadence note and it's light on oilgas field gotchas.
Sudip Sasmal
--
Spring-loaded vs pilot-operated section and the API 520 sizing walkthrough stuck; it's practical, though I wasn't sold on the maintenance chapter depth.
bikash sahoo
--
Feels aimed at folks who've already bumped into the usual instrumentation headaches and want a map. The P&ID walkthrough in Module 3, especially the control valve sizing example and ISA tag conventions, stuck; translating that to client specs is faster. I wasn't sold on the CAD tool tour, and wished for more on loop checks hitting prod, but the arch vs infra framing and tie-ins to oilgas ops helped. I've been around long enough to know when material will hold up in handoffs, though a short CI or PR checklist in the repo would've helped.
Sayanika Bandyopadhyay
Engineer
Covers the stuff that blows up at 3am when alarms won’t clear and prod data’s thin. The chapter on P&ID tagging and the loop diagram walk-through where they trace a level transmitter through marshalling to PLC stuck; the bit about ISA-5.1 symbols saved me a back-and-forth in a PR. It's mostly beginner-paced; I wished there's more on control valve sizing math and how it changes RPS during startups. Still, it aligned how we talk across arch/infra/obs on an energyutilities job, which cut noise in the repo and CI checks.
Beginner-friendly pass through instrumentation basics; the P&ID symbols walkthrough and the 4–20 mA loop wiring example stuck. Useful for oilgas/energyutilities entry roles, but wasn't sold on the light control valve sizing math and missing PLC/DCS arch handoff; it's mostly career framing, not day-one shop-floor obs.
Came in skeptical about the overhead for a beginner track, but the framing around instrumentation arch vs plant infra worked better than expected. The section on P&ID symbols and the 4–20 mA loop check around the midpoint stuck, especially the example tracing a bad transmitter through a control valve in an oilgas plant. I’ve built prod systems on k8s and CI pipelines, so mapping legacy loops to modern obs thinking helped, though I wasn’t sold on the short bit about PLC brands.
Module 2’s ISA symbols + loop diagram walkthrough (mapping a pressure transmitter through the P&ID to the control valve) stuck. it's a fine on-ramp for beginners, but I wasn't sold on the thin coverage of vendor datasheets and calc sheets, and wished there was more on real handoffs into prod.
This course doesn’t sell a shortcut into instrumentation; it’s pretty upfront that the path is procedural and sometimes tedious, which maps to how work actually shows up on a team. As a TeamLead juggling prod fires and PR reviews, I liked the early framing around where design hands off to ops, especially the Sensors vs Transmitters section with the 4–20 mA loop sketch and failure modes. That bit clicked because it mirrors how abstractions crack in software arch when infra assumptions leak into prod obs. The pacing is mostly fine for beginners, though I wasn’t sold on the career-planning chapter; it felt lighter than the technical bits, and I wished there was more on calibration standards and handover in energyutilities. It still helped me translate concepts for my team, even if we live in repos, CI, and k8s instead of panels and wiring. Cost-wise it’s reasonable, and I didn’t feel like time was wasted. Net effect: better instincts on where clean diagrams stop matching real RPS and maintenance constraints.
Muhammad Ramadhan Ismukada Syahrif
Piping Engineer
Clear on the mechanics: the Instrument Index chapter, especially the ISA tag numbering example and the control valve sizing walkthrough in Section 4, was practical for teams touching prod infra. It's aligned with energyutilities realities, though I wasn't sold on the skimpy obs handoff—wished there was more on alarm rationalization impacts before PRs hit arch.
Amal Krishna
Engineer
The drawings and calc walk-throughs look like stuff I’d actually put in a repo or attach to a PR, not academic filler. The section on control valve sizing, specifically the Cv example that checks flashing before trim selection, stuck with me and maps cleanly to how we review arch choices in oilgas plants. It bridges legacy P&IDs with modern plant infra expectations without pretending everything’s new. mostly good, though I wasn’t sold on the brief treatment of k8s-style obs analogies; wished there was a bit more on field calibration edge cases.
Ali Raza
Instrumentation engineer
Good refresher for day-to-day instr work; the control valve sizing chapter with the Cv calc walkthrough and vendor datasheet check felt close to prod. It's mostly practical, but I wasn't sold on the skim over loop diagrams—ISA-5.1 symbols flew by, and I wished there was more on commissioning handover.
MOTLAQ ALSUBAIEI
Engineer
Content runs dense without padding, which suits an intermediate pace when time's tight. The section on ISA‑5.1 tagging and the I/O list walk‑through stuck, especially the example tracing a loop from spec to hook‑up drawing; it felt like a clean PR checklist you can reuse. Mostly good, though I wasn't sold on the cable sizing bit and wished there was a short note on energy utilities edge cases. I've already reused the tag conventions and loop checks on a live job, cutting rework before it hits prod.
Kana Karmur
Manager
Minor gripe first: module 4 dragged a bit, and the labs assume you’ve already got SmartPlant or similar stood up, which slowed me between meetings. Used this to sanity-check assumptions our team had already locked into a prod change. The pacing after that worked. Section 6 on control valve sizing stuck with me, especially the Cv walk-through tied back to a noisy P&ID and the note on flashing vs cavitation. That mirrored a PR I’d just reviewed. Good coverage on loop diagrams and instrument index hygiene; the cause-and-effect example was practical, not academic. It helped fill gaps between arch intent and what actually lands in the field, especially for oilgas handoffs. I’ve got fewer “I think this is right” moments now.
Sayanika Bandyopadhyay
Engineer
Skips the hype and stays on what the hardware actually does, which I liked coming from a mixed legacy/modern stack. The section on valve characteristics, especially the equal‑percentage vs linear curves with the pump loop example, stuck; it finally mapped the datasheet shapes to behavior I’ve seen in prod. I’ve been bridging old pneumatic stuff with newer control infra, and the Cv sizing walk‑through with ΔP math felt like reading a clean PR after too many hand‑wavy specs. The beginner framing mostly works, though I wasn’t sold on the short detour into positioners without more failure modes or obs tie‑ins. context from oilgas skids helped, but I wished there was a bit more on how this lands when you wire it into modern arch, alarms, and CI checks. It’s already helped me simplify a couple overcooked logic paths in our control app and calm some RPS spikes at the loop level.
Sawrabh Raj
Sr Instrumentation Design Engineer, Global Trainer- Instrumentation Design
Came into this to sanity‑check how our team handles control valves in prod units, especially where legacy meets newer infra. The section on valve sizing, specifically the ISA S75 walk‑through comparing linear vs equal‑percentage trims with a quick Cv calc, stuck because it mirrors what I see in oilgas. I've used the fail‑open vs fail‑close examples to frame arch tradeoffs the same way we do PRs in a repo. Mostly works; wasn't sold on the short treatment of diagnostics and obs, but it's a handy reference when those reviews come up.
Balaji Paskanti
Engineer
Module 3 on valve sizing dragged a bit, and the labs assume you already have a simulator wired up; had to stub things in my own repo to keep moving. Kept jotting notes I’ve already pulled back up at work. The Cv walk-through using the steam example, then checking choked flow against the ISA chart, stuck. Same with the short clip on positioner hysteresis and why it shows up as limit cycling in prod trends. It frames valves as part of the control arch, not just hardware, which helped when reviewing PRs for control logic. For a beginner course, it doesn’t talk down, and it maps cleanly to oilgas setups I’ve seen. I read P&IDs and control configs a bit differently now.
mehmet yaman
Engineer