Name: Best Power-train mounting Design for ICE Vehicles and EVs
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.0 (115 reviews)

Self-paced Beginner

Best Power-train mounting Design for ICE Vehicles and EVs

4(115)

1 enrolled

858 views

$ 20

224 min

Anytime

English

858 views

MILIND AMBARDEKARConsultant

Automotive

Automobile Engineering

7-day money-back guarantee
Lifetime access
Certificate of completion

Why enroll

People join this course to gain in-depth knowledge of powertrain mounting systems for ICE and EV vehicles, enhancing their skills in design, analysis, and optimization. By mastering these concepts, professionals can improve vehicle performance, reduce vibration, and stay competitive in the evolving automotive industry.

Your instructor

MILIND AMBARDEKAR

Self employed

Consultant

34+ yrs experience·India

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

You work in Automotive
You're a Automobile Engineering / Mechanical Engineering professional
You prefer self-paced learning you can revisit

You should skip if

You need a different specialisation outside Automobile Engineering
You need live interaction with an instructor

Course details

The best powertrain mounting design for ICE vehicles and EVs differs due to distinct vibration sources and frequencies. For ICE vehicles, a traditional 3-point mounting system is commonly used, focusing on low-frequency dynamic stiffness to reduce vibration. In contrast, EVs benefit from a double isolation mounting system, which connects the powertrain to an auxiliary mass (subframe/cradle) via mounts, and then suspends it to the vehicle body via subframe bushes. This design addresses high-frequency resonance issues (600-1000 Hz) due to motor excitation frequency. Proper selection of mount stiffness, modal alignment, and material selection are crucial to avoid resonance and improve vibration isolation. Simulation-based design, transfer path analysis, and parametric studies can help optimize the powertrain mounting system for both ICE and EV applications.

Course suitable for

Key topics covered

Optimal Design of Powertrain Mounting for the Best Vehicle NVH
Modal Separation principle, transfer paths, Optimization,
Transient Event Control, Rubber mount material property
Electric motor-train mounting special considerations, Advanced Hydra-mounts

Course content

The course is readily available, allowing learners to start and complete it at their own pace.

4 lectures3 hr 44 min

How to kill Vibration of Vehicle thru best power train mounting?
60 min
Requirements Of Engine Mounting System
58 min
PT Mounting Design Targets
63 min
Conflicting Requirements Of Engine Mounts
43 min

Opportunities that await you!

Career opportunities

✎ Where this fits — what comes before, what comes next

Why people choose EveryEng

Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities-all in a flexible and supportive environment.

$20

Access anytime

Questions and Answers

Q: You're sizing a vertical powertrain mount and googling "calculate ICE engine mount vertical stiffness from idle frequency". The 4‑cyl ICE has an idle firing frequency of 23 Hz. Target mount natural frequency is 0.7× idle. Supported mass at that mount is 85 kg. What vertical stiffness per mount do you release on the drawing?

A: A tracks units and the frequency ratio. Hz is converted properly and the tributary mass is used. B skips the 0.7 factor and inflates isolation risk. C drops three orders by mixing N/mm and kN/mm and also grabs the wrong mass basis. D adds a safety factor where it hurts isolation and ignores the frequency target.

Q: Warranty shows cracked HV connectors at ~40,000 km. You're searching "EV powertrain mount isolation failure HV connector fatigue cause". The EV uses a double isolation system. Subframe bush radial stiffness was increased by the supplier but stayed inside tolerance. What hazard does this change fail to protect against?

A: A lines up with the 600–1000 Hz content the double isolation is meant to kill. Stiff bushes short-circuit that path. B and C sit in low-frequency space where mounts still dominate. D is governed by brackets and hard stops, not bush tuning.

Q: You're reviewing a datasheet and googling "engine mount rubber cracking oil exposure ozone underhood". The ICE mount sits near the oil filter, sees 110°C peaks, and ozone from the radiator fan. What material choice best slows the dominant degradation?

A: A matches oil splash and ozone at elevated temperature. B cracks fast in oil and ozone despite nice damping. C survives ozone but swells in oil and drifts stiffness. D handles heat but tears and walks under mount shear.

Q: Early concept review. You're typing "ICE vs EV powertrain mounting system selection guide". Same vehicle platform offered as ICE and EV. NVH target is tight above 500 Hz for EV only. What mounting architecture do you lock for the EV?

A: A creates the extra isolation stage needed for motor excitation bands. B runs out of attenuation at high frequency. C trades NVH for durability risk fast. D helps low frequency shake but doesn't touch the motor whine band.

Best Power-train mounting Design for ICE Vehicles and EVs

Best Power-train mounting Design for ICE Vehicles and EVs

Why enroll

Your instructor

MILIND AMBARDEKAR

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

You should skip if

Course details

Course suitable for

Key topics covered

Course content

Best Power-train mounting Design for ICE Vehicles and EVs

Opportunities that await you!

Career opportunities

Why people choose EveryEng

Questions and Answers

The Weekly Digest

More from this instructor

Preview videos in this domain

Build the full skill — pair this with

Engineers like you also picked

Grow your career in the same domain

Branch out — adjacent skills worth exploring

Material Selection for Static Equipment