Buggy Frame Design In SOLIDWORKS | EveryEng

Skip to main content

Self-paced Advanced

Buggy Frame Design In SOLIDWORKS

4(1591)

3741 views

$ 10

194 min

Anytime

English

3741 views

Team EveryEngMechanical Engineering

Mechanical Engineering

7-day money-back guarantee
Lifetime access
Anytime Learning
Learn from Industry Expert

Why enroll

The course begins with an overview of the SolidWorks interface and essential tools, ensuring students are comfortable navigating the software environment. From there, emphasis is placed on sketching, dimensioning, and constraining 2D profiles, which form the foundation of 3D modeling.

Your instructor

Team EveryEng

Engineer

Mechanical Engineering

22+ yrs experience·India

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

You work in Automotive
You're a Mechanical Engineering / CAD & Analysis professional
You have 3+ years of hands-on experience in this field
You prefer self-paced learning you can revisit

You should skip if

You're new to this field with no prior experience
You need a different specialisation outside Mechanical Engineering
You need live interaction with an instructor

Course details

The Buggy Frame Design in SOLIDWORKS course is designed to provide a comprehensive understanding of designing and modeling a robust vehicle chassis using advanced CAD tools. This course introduces participants to the fundamentals of frame design, including material selection, structural integrity, and load distribution. Learners will gain hands-on experience in creating 3D models of buggy frames using weldments and structural members in SOLIDWORKS. The course also covers sketching techniques, parametric modeling, and assembly design to build accurate and efficient frame structures. Participants will explore design optimization methods to enhance strength while minimizing weight. Real-world design considerations such as safety standards and manufacturability are also discussed. Through practical exercises, learners will simulate real-life design challenges and improve their problem-solving skills. The course emphasizes best practices in design documentation and detailing for production. By the end of the course, participants will be able to confidently design, analyze, and modify buggy frames for various applications. This course is ideal for students, mechanical engineers, and design enthusiasts looking to build expertise in vehicle frame design.

Course suitable for

Key topics covered

Buggy Frame Design
Designing a tire
Wheel Rim Design
Disc Brake Design
Shork Absorber Design
Assembly of Buggy (All parts)

Course content

The course is readily available, allowing learners to start and complete it at their own pace.

10 lectures3 hr 14 min

Buggy Frame Design I
20 min
Buggy Frame Design II
20 min
Buggy Frame Design III
14 min
Buggy Frame Design IV
15 min
Design a Tire
12 min
Design a Wheel Rim
18 min
Design a Disc Brake-I
15 min
Design a Disc Brake-II
14 min
Design a Shock Absorber
29 min
Assembly
37 min

Opportunities that await you!

Skills & tools you'll gain

Career opportunities

Why people choose EveryEng

Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities-all in a flexible and supportive environment.

$10

Access anytime

Questions and Answers

Q: You're reviewing a GA drawing before sign‑off and you google "SOLIDWORKS buggy frame drawing weldment cut list mismatch". The cut list shows Tube ID T‑17 as 25.4×2.0 mm, but the detail view calls out 25.4×1.6 mm with no revision cloud. What action keeps homologation risk lowest?

A: Blocking release removes the risk of building nonconforming hardware from conflicting sources. Option A trusts a parametric link without verifying the library profile, C trades drawing control for analysis optimism, and D implements a material change without traceability or safety review.

Q: You’re sizing torsional stiffness and search "buggy frame torsional stiffness Nm per degree calculation". Opposite wheels are loaded ±1 g producing 1,800 N at each contact patch, track width is 1.4 m, and measured twist is 1.2°. What stiffness do you report?

A: 2,100 N·m/deg reflects total torque of 1,800×1.4 divided by measured rotation. Option A halves the moment arm, C double‑counts wheel loads, and D ignores the opposing load path.

Q: Your lead asks why rollover tubes must stay within an envelope and you search "SAE Baja roll cage clearance helmet requirement". During inspection the top tube intrudes 15 mm into the defined head clearance zone. What’s the defensible call?

A: Rejecting enforces the intent of preventing contact before loads develop. Option A mixes passive protection with geometry, C confuses strength with clearance, and D shifts a design constraint to the user.

Q: You google "SOLIDWORKS frame drawing GD&T weld symbol interpretation" while checking a node detail. A fillet weld symbol shows 6 mm on the arrow side only, with no length specified. How is this read?

A: A continuous arrow‑side fillet meets the symbol exactly as drawn. Option B invents intermittency, C assumes symmetry not shown, and D confuses leg size with throat.