Skip to main contentEngineering Courses, Mentoring & Jobs | EveryEng
Design of Pressure Vessel using COMPRESS – Different Component Design Requirement & it’s impact banner

Design of Pressure Vessel using COMPRESS – Different Component Design Requirement & it’s impact

Design of Pressure Vessel using COMPRESS – Different Component Design Requirement & it’s impact banner
Live online Beginner

Design of Pressure Vessel using COMPRESS – Different Component Design Requirement & it’s impact

3(70)
822 views
₹ 3000
3 hrs
Next month
English
822 views
Shanmugam V
Shanmugam VLead / Senior Mechanical Engineer/Static Equipment Engineer
  • 7-day money-back guarantee
  • Session recordings included
  • Certificate of completion

Why enroll

1. How elementary and advanced topics of Solid mechanics are applied in development of Pressure vessel codes and standards.

2. Theoretical background behind design code requirements which helps an engineer understand the strengths, weaknesses and applicability of the code requirements.

3. An insight into the newly introduced codes.

4. Bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge and code requirements.

5. University students who want to take up career in static equipment engineering and wants to learn about the most widely used Industrial standard.

6. Experienced engineers who want to understand the background of code rules and requirements

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

  • You work in Manufacturing & Industrial or Oil & Gas Upstream
  • You're a Mechanical Engineering / Piping & Layout Engineering professional
  • You prefer live, instructor-led training with Q&A

You should skip if

  • You need a different specialisation outside Mechanical Engineering
  • You need fully self-paced, on-demand content

Course details

This course will cover basic and advanced topics of Pressure Vessel Engineering Design and Manufacturing requirement to provide a robust understanding of the background theory behind technical requirements of Pressure Vessel codes and standards. This will serve as a refresher course on core and advanced topics of Pressure Vessel Engineering to understand technical background of design and analysis as per codes & standards.

This course covers all important aspects of Pressure Vessel Design, Fabrication and testing, which comprises of

• Design, Analysis and Engineering requirement for Pressure Vessel

• Metallurgy and Material Selection while designing Pressure vessel

• Fabrication prerequisite while Pressure Vessel engineering

• Heat Treatment requirement for Pressure Vessel

• Testing & Inspection essentials for Pressure Vessel Design

All of above topics are covered in different modules of this course hence we encourage you to enroll all modules to learn all major and critical areas of Pressure vessel engineering.

Classifications of Static Equipment Engineering is a specialized discipline of Mechanical Engineering which covers the design of static equipments like Pressure vessels (Process Columns, Drums, Reactors, Separators, Drain vessel), Heat exchangers (Shell and Tube, Plate and Frame, Plate and Shell, Air Coolers), Atmospheric Tanks (Low pressure and LPG Tanks), Flare Stack in chemical, petrochemical, or hydrocarbon facilities. We have different courses to cover above listed equipment & do participate in all courses.

Course suitable for

Key topics covered

1. Different Component Design Requirement & it’s impact

a. Local Load Analysis WRC 537 & WRC 297

b. Flange rating

c. Stiffiner ring design

d. Saddle design

Do enroll other module to learn more on fundamentals of Design of pressure vessel and understand ASME Code that are critical for a static equipment engineer.

Opportunities that await you!

Skills & tools you'll gain

COMPRESS

Career opportunities

Training details

This is a live course that has a scheduled start date.

Why people choose EveryEng

Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities-all in a flexible and supportive environment.

What learners say about this course

Divya Patwa
Divya Patwa
May 3, 2026

The junior-to-senior gap shows up fast in this course, especially around when heat treatment is optional versus mandated. The PWHT exemptions walkthrough using UCS-56 Fig. UCS-56.1 stuck with me, where the instructor toggles thickness and material in PV Elite and you see the code checks flip; that felt like connecting theory to what actually blocks a PR in prod. As a grad entrant, it's helpful to map this to how we think about arch and infra constraints, even if the domain’s pressure vessels in energyutilities. I’ve already started mirroring the calc outputs into our repo and sanity-checking them the way I would CI results, which I didn’t expect. One gripe: the residual stress explanation was mostly there, but I wished for a bit more on how shops handle edge cases day to day. still, the pacing worked for beginner to intermediate, and it nudged me toward thinking ahead about migration work rather than just passing checks.

abdul wali
abdul wali Engineer
May 3, 2026

Signed up to close a gap before a role migration, mostly around code-driven vessel sizing vs shop lore. The UG-27 shell thickness walkthrough in PV Elite stuck, then hopping to Compress for the tubesheet check and seeing where inputs diverge; felt like reviewing an arch PR, not hand-waving. I've used parts in prod since, though I wasn't sold on how lightly wind/seismic loads were treated and wished there was more obs around failure cases. It's a careful, no-shortcuts walk through a messy topic—helped bridge beginner to intermediate without pretending infra is magic.

Rohit Abudhia
Rohit Abudhia HVAC , MECHANICAL
May 3, 2026

it's a ramp from basics to tools; the UG-27 shell thickness walkthrough in PV Elite, then cross-checking Appendix 1 flange calcs in COMPRESS, stuck because it mirrors oilgas day-to-day. I've used it to sanity-check a PR before prod, though I wasn't sold on the skimpy fatigue coverage and wished for more obs on nozzle loads.

yogesh patil
yogesh patil Ass.design manager
May 3, 2026

Useful baseline for onboarding juniors; the PV Elite nozzle reinforcement walk-through in the UG-37 example section stuck, showing MAWP changes as inputs shift. It's mostly Div 1 focused—wasn't sold on Compress fatigue coverage, and I wished there's more on arch decisions and handoff to prod drawings/PRs for oilgas energyutilities teams.

₹3000

₹0 Early bird

Coming in Next Month

Questions and Answers

A: Leaving this uncorrected risks a failed Authorized Inspector review and a late re-run of nozzle checks. The GA showing a repad while COMPRESS credits only shell excess means the pressure boundary model and fabrication drawing are misaligned. Aligning them avoids a situation where the shop installs reinforcement that was never code-credited, or worse, relies on reinforcement that was never analyzed.

A: Picking the wrong path here can stall fabrication with additional analysis and QA hold points. Div 1 meets the pressure and material envelope without triggering fatigue, plastic collapse, or higher inspection burden. That keeps the pressure test and MC window intact instead of chasing marginal thickness gains.

A: Underestimating thickness here leads straight to a hydrotest failure or a redline during AI review. Applying UG‑27 with joint efficiency and then adding corrosion allowance yields a value just over one inch. That keeps MAWP intact without silently consuming future corrosion margin.

A: Ignoring this risks burning days chasing torque while the leak rate keeps climbing. Shell ovalization under hydro can rotate the flange enough to unload one side of the gasket, and the effect grows with each pressurization. Addressing alignment or stiffening stops the trend instead of masking it.