Skip to main contentEngineering Courses, Mentoring & Jobs | EveryEng
Design of Pressure Vessel using COMPRESS – Fabrication & Heat Treatment Requirement for Design Engineer banner

Design of Pressure Vessel using COMPRESS – Fabrication & Heat Treatment Requirement for Design Engineer

Design of Pressure Vessel using COMPRESS – Fabrication & Heat Treatment Requirement for Design Engineer banner
Live online Beginner

Design of Pressure Vessel using COMPRESS – Fabrication & Heat Treatment Requirement for Design Engineer

3(70)
743 views
₹ 3500
5 hrs
Next month
English
743 views
Shanmugam V
Shanmugam VLead / Senior Mechanical Engineer/Static Equipment Engineer
  • 7-day money-back guarantee
  • Session recordings included
  • Certificate of completion

Why enroll

1. How elementary and advanced topics of pressure vessel manufacturing that are applied in development of Pressure vessel codes and standards.

2. Theoretical background behind design code requirements which helps an engineer understand the strengths, weaknesses and applicability of the code requirements.

3. An insight into the newly introduced codes.

4. Bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge and code requirements.

5. University students who want to take up career in static equipment engineering and wants to learn about the most widely used Industrial standard.

6. Experienced engineers who want to understand the background of code rules and requirements

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

  • You work in Oil & Gas Upstream or Pharmaceutical & Healthcare
  • You're a Mechanical Engineering professional
  • You prefer live, instructor-led training with Q&A

You should skip if

  • You need a different specialisation outside Mechanical Engineering
  • You need fully self-paced, on-demand content

Course details

The Design of Pressure Vessel using COMPRESS – Fabrication & Heat Treatment Requirement for Design Engineer course is specifically tailored for engineers and professionals involved in pressure vessel design, fabrication, and quality assurance. This course teaches participants how to use COMPRESS software to design pressure vessels according to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC), while also integrating critical aspects of fabrication processes and heat treatment requirements. Learners gain knowledge of welding techniques, stress relief procedures, and proper heat treatment methods to ensure structural integrity, material performance, and compliance with industry standards. By combining software-based design exercises with practical fabrication and metallurgical considerations, the course equips design engineers to produce safe, reliable, and manufacturable pressure vessels for applications in power plants, oil & gas, petrochemical, and process industries, bridging the gap between theoretical design and practical engineering implementation.

Course suitable for

Key topics covered

This module talks about fabrication requirement as per ASME Code. Production & Fabrication is one of most important aspect of Pressure vessel Engineering and through understanding of fabrication is essential for Design Engineering because their drawing will get converted into actual product. Following topics are covered in this module
1. Dishend Fabrication
2. Plate Rolling
3. Pressure vessel fabrication tolerance requirement
4. Welding and weld joints
5. Impact testing requirements
6. Platform and ladders
7. Heat Treatment requirement
a. Pre Heat
b. Post weld heat treatment
c. Normalizing
d. Annealing
e. Tempering
Do enroll other module to learn more on fundamentals of material requirement while designing pressure vessel and understand ASME Code that are critical for a static equipment engineer.

Opportunities that await you!

Skills & tools you'll gain

COMPRESS

Career opportunities

Training details

This is a live course that has a scheduled start date.

Why people choose EveryEng

Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities-all in a flexible and supportive environment.

What learners say about this course

Divya Patwa
Divya Patwa
May 3, 2026

The junior-to-senior gap shows up fast in this course, especially around when heat treatment is optional versus mandated. The PWHT exemptions walkthrough using UCS-56 Fig. UCS-56.1 stuck with me, where the instructor toggles thickness and material in PV Elite and you see the code checks flip; that felt like connecting theory to what actually blocks a PR in prod. As a grad entrant, it's helpful to map this to how we think about arch and infra constraints, even if the domain’s pressure vessels in energyutilities. I’ve already started mirroring the calc outputs into our repo and sanity-checking them the way I would CI results, which I didn’t expect. One gripe: the residual stress explanation was mostly there, but I wished for a bit more on how shops handle edge cases day to day. still, the pacing worked for beginner to intermediate, and it nudged me toward thinking ahead about migration work rather than just passing checks.

Ved Naik
Ved Naik Engineering
May 3, 2026

Came in needing clarity on how COMPRESS treats combined load cases beyond toy calcs, and this mostly delivered for a beginner course. The walkthrough of the UG‑22 combo with wind plus seismic, then tying it to the nozzle local stress check, stuck because it mirrors what I see in oilgas specs. I've already reused that flow in a PR for a calc note. Wasn't sold on the skim over external pressure; a bit more time there would've helped, but it's moved me from barely adequate to actually competent.

Avatar icon
Swapnil Kamble
May 3, 2026

First gripe: the lab setup assumes you’ve already got PV Elite and Compress licensed and talking; that ate time. After that, the pace fit a freelancer’s weekend better than expected. Sections map cleanly to client outcomes, not theory for theory’s sake. The UG‑27 shell thickness walkthrough where they toggle joint efficiency and watch the MAWP shift in PV Elite stuck. Same with the Compress nozzle reinforcement check against UG‑37—clear why the numbers move, not just where to click. Useful context on wind/seismic inputs too, which comes up a lot in energyutilities work. It wasn’t flashy, but it shortened my path from spec to calc in prod. found myself recalling the steps days later when reviewing a vendor calc.

Emavwodia Solomon
Emavwodia Solomon engineer
May 3, 2026

Signed up to patch a narrow gap before a role shift, mostly around PV Elite workflows I hadn't touched since school. The UG‑27 shell thickness calc walk‑through, then flipping the same case in Compress to compare assumptions, stuck with me because it maps cleanly to what we push to prod calcs. It moves fast but not hand‑wavy; I wasn't sold on the brief ASME BPVC fatigue bit and wished there was more nozzle reinforcement per UG‑37. last third clicks when Appendix 1 flanges and external pressure checks finally line up with real oilgas reviews.

₹3500

₹0 Early bird

Coming in Next Month

Questions and Answers

A: The break point is the joint efficiency placement. ASME VIII Div 1 UG-27 requires dividing the pressure thickness by E, then adding corrosion allowance. For these inputs, pressure thickness is about 23 mm before CA; adding 3 mm lands near 26 mm. COMPRESS applies mill tolerance later, not inside the design thickness loop.

A: The hard boundary is 32 mm. UCS-56 triggers PWHT for P-No.1 materials above that thickness unless a specific exemption applies. MDMT and fatigue checks don't remove the base requirement, and COMPRESS flags this directly in the heat treatment report.

A: The trigger here is geometry change, not material damage. Uneven heating and poor support allow residual stresses to relax asymmetrically during soak. Grain growth and hydrogen issues don't explain shell ovality or nozzle relocation.

A: The −29°C boundary is where impact testing logic changes for many P-No.1 materials. Dropping below it forces a toughness review. Thickness, PWHT status, and material spec all matter. Cosmetic changes to nameplate or unrelated parameters don't address brittle fracture risk.