Skip to main contentEngineering Courses, Mentoring & Jobs | EveryEng
Design of Pressure Vessel using PV Elite – Material MTO and Technical delivery condition (TDC /ARM) banner

Design of Pressure Vessel using PV Elite – Material MTO and Technical delivery condition (TDC /ARM)

Design of Pressure Vessel using PV Elite – Material MTO and Technical delivery condition (TDC /ARM) banner
Live online Beginner

Design of Pressure Vessel using PV Elite – Material MTO and Technical delivery condition (TDC /ARM)

3(70)
893 views
₹ 2000
5 hrs
Next month
English
893 views
Shanmugam V
Shanmugam VLead / Senior Mechanical Engineer/Static Equipment Engineer
  • 7-day money-back guarantee
  • Session recordings included
  • Certificate of completion

Why enroll

1. How elementary and advanced topics of Solid mechanics are applied in development of Pressure vessel codes and standards.
2. Theoretical background behind design code requirements which helps an engineer understand the strengths, weaknesses and applicability of the code requirements.
3. An insight into the newly introduced codes.
4. Bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge and code requirements
5. University students who want to take up career in static equipment engineering and wants to learn about the most widely used Industrial standard.
6. Experienced engineers who want to understand the background of code rules and requirements

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

  • You work in Oil & Gas Upstream or Energy & Utilities
  • You're a Mechanical Engineering / Metallurgy & Material Science professional
  • You prefer live, instructor-led training with Q&A

You should skip if

  • You need a different specialisation outside Mechanical Engineering
  • You need fully self-paced, on-demand content

Course details

This course will cover basic and advanced topics of Pressure Vessel Engineering Design and Material requirement to provide a robust understanding of the background theory behind technical requirements of Pressure Vessel codes and standards. This will serve as a refresher course on core and advanced topics of Pressure Vessel Engineering to understand technical background of design and analysis as per codes & standards.

This course covers all important aspects of Pressure Vessel Design, Fabrication and testing, which comprises of

• Design, Analysis and Engineering requirement for Pressure Vessel

• Metallurgy and Material Selection while designing Pressure vessel

• Fabrication prerequisite while Pressure Vessel engineering

• Heat Treatment requirement for Pressure Vessel

• Testing & Inspection essentials for Pressure Vessel Design

All of above topics are covered in different modules of this course hence we encourage you to enroll all modules to learn all major and critical areas of Pressure vessel engineering.

Classifications of Static Equipment Engineering is a specialized discipline of Mechanical Engineering which covers the design of static equipments like Pressure vessels (Process Columns, Drums, Reactors, Separators, Drain vessel), Heat exchangers (Shell and Tube, Plate and Frame, Plate and Shell, Air Coolers), Atmospheric Tanks (Low pressure and LPG Tanks), Flare Stack in chemical, petrochemical, or hydrocarbon facilities. We have different courses to cover above listed equipment & do participate in all courses.

Course suitable for

Key topics covered

This module talks about ASME Code. ASME Section II Part A, B & D standards & also various Lattice structures will be discussed so that the actual usage in industry can be understood. Chemical & mechanical properties of various types of steels will be covered at length. Anyone who goes through these details will be able to understand and implements the facts in live projects. Following topics are covered in this module

1. Material MTO and Technical delivery condition (TDC /ARM)

a. Plate nesting

b. Material takeoff for procurement

c. Technical delivery condition of materials procurement

Do enroll other module to learn more on fundamentals of material requirement while designing pressure vessel and understand ASME Code that are critical for a static equipment engineer.

Opportunities that await you!

Skills & tools you'll gain

PVElite

Career opportunities

Training details

This is a live course that has a scheduled start date.

Why people choose EveryEng

Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities-all in a flexible and supportive environment.

What learners say about this course

Ved Naik
Ved Naik Engineering
May 3, 2026

Came in needing clarity on how COMPRESS treats combined load cases beyond toy calcs, and this mostly delivered for a beginner course. The walkthrough of the UG‑22 combo with wind plus seismic, then tying it to the nozzle local stress check, stuck because it mirrors what I see in oilgas specs. I've already reused that flow in a PR for a calc note. Wasn't sold on the skim over external pressure; a bit more time there would've helped, but it's moved me from barely adequate to actually competent.

abdul wali
abdul wali Engineer
May 3, 2026

Signed up to close a gap before a role migration, mostly around code-driven vessel sizing vs shop lore. The UG-27 shell thickness walkthrough in PV Elite stuck, then hopping to Compress for the tubesheet check and seeing where inputs diverge; felt like reviewing an arch PR, not hand-waving. I've used parts in prod since, though I wasn't sold on how lightly wind/seismic loads were treated and wished there was more obs around failure cases. It's a careful, no-shortcuts walk through a messy topic—helped bridge beginner to intermediate without pretending infra is magic.

Rohit Abudhia
Rohit Abudhia HVAC , MECHANICAL
May 3, 2026

it's a ramp from basics to tools; the UG-27 shell thickness walkthrough in PV Elite, then cross-checking Appendix 1 flange calcs in COMPRESS, stuck because it mirrors oilgas day-to-day. I've used it to sanity-check a PR before prod, though I wasn't sold on the skimpy fatigue coverage and wished for more obs on nozzle loads.

Avatar icon
Sumeet Thakur
May 3, 2026

Between client calls, this course clicked a few things about how small design choices ripple into performance. The nozzle reinforcement walk-through in the UG-37 check, plus the PV Elite wind/seismic combo example, stuck; seeing the stress ratio jump when skirt thickness moved 2 mm was concrete. Mostly practical, though I wasn't sold on the brief corrosion allowance bit—wished there was more on energyutilities cases in prod reviews. I've bookmarked it as a reference for future arch reviews.

₹2000

₹0 Early bird

Coming in Next Month

Questions and Answers

A: A fits the environment: wet H2S plus water drives SSC risk, so NACE hardness and PWHT matter. B adds Cr but ignores hardness and PWHT control; alloying alone doesn’t block SSC. C misses NACE entirely; as‑rolled carbon steel is a classic failure path. D overreaches; duplex can work but blows cost and still needs sour service controls, not a free pass.

A: A aligns with the fracture mechanics intent; toughness drops with temperature. B confuses WPS with material toughness. C invents a thickness cutoff; exemptions are conditional, not that simple. D swaps mechanisms; corrosion fatigue isn’t what MDMT addresses.

A: A fixes the source; internals drive ΔP. B masks the problem and can push surge. C mixes phases; liquid dumping barely affects gas pad loss. D ignores compressor limits and trips waiting to happen.

A: A is a level problem, not pressure; PSVs don’t see it. B is a classic relieving case. C is covered by fire sizing if designed. D is exactly the blocked outlet scenario.