Firefighting Design & Installation Training | EveryEng

Skip to main content

Self-paced Advanced

Firefighting Design & Installation Training

4(8)

1314 views

FREE

1096 min

Anytime

English

1314 views

Nagarajan ThanumoorthySenior Mechanical Engineer

Energy & Utilities

Mechanical Engineering

Lifetime access
Certificate of completion
Anytime Learning
Learn from Industry Expert

Volume pricing for groups of 5+

Why enroll

✔️ Be able to design a complete firefighting system for any building independently.
✔️ Have an in-depth understanding of fire safety requirements, codes, and design best practices.
✔️ Learn to tackle real-world design challenges and issues effectively.
✔️ Gain the confidence to handle projects professionally in the MEP industry.

Your instructor

Nagarajan Thanumoorthy

Mechanical Engineer

Senior Mechanical Engineer

12+ yrs experience·United Arab Emirates

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

You work in Energy & Utilities
You're a Mechanical Engineering professional
You have 3+ years of hands-on experience in this field
You prefer self-paced learning you can revisit

You should skip if

You're new to this field with no prior experience
You need a different specialisation outside Mechanical Engineering
You need live interaction with an instructor

Course details

Firefighting Design & Installation Training provides comprehensive knowledge on planning, designing, and implementing fire protection systems in buildings and industrial facilities. The course covers key components such as fire detection and alarm systems, sprinkler systems, hydrant networks, fire pumps, and suppression systems, along with relevant safety codes and standards. Participants learn how to perform hydraulic calculations, select appropriate equipment, and ensure proper system layout for effective fire control. The training also emphasizes installation practices, testing, commissioning, and maintenance to ensure system reliability during emergencies. This course is highly valuable for engineers, safety professionals, and technicians involved in construction, facility management, and industrial safety, as it equips them with the skills required to design compliant and efficient firefighting systems that protect life and property.

Course suitable for

Key topics covered

FIREFIGHTING DESIGN & INSTALLATION

Chapter-1

Fundamentals in Fire Fighting

Fire Fighting Design concepts & scope

Overview of Building safety codes for Safety-NFPA, IBC & QCDD.

Fire Triangle concepts & cause of fire.

Types of system & Equipment in Fire Fighting

Chapter-2

NFPA-10-Fire Extinguisher:

Types of Hazards

Fire Extinguisher types

PASS procedure

Fuel classifications

Application of fire extinguishers

Selections based on different fuel classifications

Chapter-3

NFPA-13-Sprinkler System:

Basics of sprinklers

Types of sprinklers

Types of sprinklers system

Wet sprinkler system

Dry sprinkler system

Pre-Action sprinkler system

Deluge sprinkler system

Characteristics of sprinklers

Classification of Hazards

Light Hazard

Ordinary Hazard Group-I

Ordinary Hazard Group-II

Extra Hazard Group-I

Extra Hazard Group-II

Sprinkler system arrangements

Gridded type arrangements

Tree type arrangements

Looped type arrangements

Sprinkler system Design

Pipe schedule method requirements, sample workouts

Hydraulic calculation methods, sample workouts

Hazen Williams Equation

Chapter-4

NFPA-14-Stand pipe system

Introduction & classes of stand pipe system

Types of stand pipes & usage

Stand pipe connections & pipe sizing

Flow rate and pressure requirements for design (Class-I, II, III)

Hose reel system, coverage distances

Fire Hydrants

Hydraulic calculation requirements

Chapter-5

NFPA-20-Fire Pumps

Introduction, design requirements

Type of pumps

Pump selection criteria & performance curve review

Accessories Site installation requirements (OS & Y Gate valve, Circulation relief valve, PRV, etc)

Pipes, accessories (Flow meter, relief valve, etc) sizing

Tank sizing & location (NFPA-22)

Chapter-6

NFPA-2001-Clean Agent System-FM 200

Agent properties & design methods

Working Mechanism

Total flooding system

Types of hazard & design concepts

Pipe sizing

Pipes, fittings & nozzles selections

Agent Quantity selection

Installation requirements

FM 200 components

Chapter-7

NFPA-12-Carbon Dioxide Management system

Agent properties, design methods

Working Mechanism

Total flooding system

Local application system

Pipe sizing

Pipes, fittings, nozzles selection

Agent Quantity selection

Installation requirements

CO2 system components

Chapter-8

NFPA-72-Fire Alarm system

Alarm devices & ideas of system

Manual & automatic detection

Smoke management system

Heat detection system

Flame detection system

Addressable system

Fire alarm system

Interfacing concepts

Chapter-9

Projects using Elite software

Chapter-10

Practical design issues & how to resolve those problems

Course content

The course is readily available, allowing learners to start and complete it at their own pace.

20 lectures18 hr 16 min

FF-CLASS 1
70 min
FF-CLASS 2
91 min
FF-CLASS 3
53 min
FF-CLASS 4
91 min
FF-CLASS 5
91 min
FF-CLASS 6-P-1
46 min
FF-CLASS 6-P-2
35 min
FF-CLASS 7
60 min
FF-CLASS 8-P-1
3 min
FF-CLASS 8-P-2
69 min
FF-CLASS 9
86 min
FF-CLASS 10
37 min
FF-CLASS 11
50 min
FF-CLASS 12
49 min
FF-CLASS 13
58 min
FF-CLASS 14
35 min
FF-CLASS 15
60 min
FF-CLASS 16
45 min
FF-CLASS 17
32 min
FF-CLASS 18
35 min

Opportunities that await you!

Career opportunities

FREE

Access anytime

Questions and Answers

Q: During acceptance testing, a dry pipe sprinkler system fails to trip because the accelerator was isolated. You're asked to assess exposure using the search phrase dry pipe sprinkler accelerator failure consequence. What physical outcome does this safeguard failure NOT protect against?

A: Picking the wrong outcome skews your risk register and can push you into unnecessary heat tracing or pipe replacement. The accelerator only affects trip time; it doesn't prevent freezing. Faster trip limits HRR growth and ceiling jet temperatures and helps keep the smoke layer higher, but ice formation is controlled by system type and ambient conditions, not the accelerator.

Q: You're sanity-checking a pump sizing memo using the phrase estimate fire pump flow from hazard area. Light hazard office, 1,500 m² compartment. What order-of-magnitude total flow should you expect before hose allowance?

A: Underestimating flow leads to a pump that passes FAT but fails during a real fire, pushing a late redesign. Light hazard density is about 4 mm/min over the remote area, not the whole compartment. Multiply density by design area and convert units and you land near 1.9 m³/min. One-sprinkler and residential assumptions miss the fire growth reality.

Q: Hydraulic calcs are under review using the phrase calculate sprinkler discharge from k-factor. A K80 metric sprinkler sees 3.5 bar at the orifice. What flow should appear on the calc sheet?

A: A wrong flow cascades into undersized mains and a failed hydraulic review, delaying SAT. Metric K-factors use bar in the square-root relationship. Q equals 80 times the square root of 3.5, giving about 150 L/min. Converting pressure units or linear scaling breaks the physics of orifice flow.

Q: A foam deluge valve opens, but the proportioner is mis-set at 1% instead of 3%. You're searching foam proportioner mis-set fire consequence. What physical effect should you expect at the fire?

A: Assuming no impact risks a failed full-scale test and damaged credibility with operations. Under-proportioning cuts film strength and drainage time, so vapors break through and HRR stays high. Expansion ratio and throw aren't improved by starving concentrate, and water rate alone doesn't compensate on pool fires.