Skip to main contentEngineering Courses, Mentoring & Jobs | EveryEng
Full Course on Storage Tank Inspection banner

Full Course on Storage Tank Inspection

Full Course on Storage Tank Inspection banner
Live online Basic

Full Course on Storage Tank Inspection

4(6)
1960 views
₹ 2500
-
Next month
1960 views
Jyoti Swarup
Jyoti Swarup
  • 7-day money-back guarantee
  • Session recordings included
  • Certificate of completion

What enrolled engineers say

2 verified reviews
  • May 3, 2026

    The reasoning behind the examples held up when I sanity-checked them against day-to-day oilgas infra work. The chapter on API 653 shell-to-bottom weld inspection, especially the UT grid example and corrosion-rate calc before a hydrotest, stuck because it mirrors prod outage calls. It's mostly practical; wasn't sold on the quick skim of coatings failure modes, and I wished there was a bit more on obs during in-service inspections. Still, the pacing lays out a clear path from baseline inspection to confident sign-off without fluff.

    Amit M. Verified
  • May 3, 2026

    Coming from maintaining legacy infra, the course reframed tank inspection like refactoring old prod systems, and it's useful when you don't get to start greenfield. The API 653 Section 6 floor inspection walkthrough comparing MFL grid spacing to UT spot checks, including the missed edge corrosion example, stuck with me; I wished there was more on RBI tooling. It bridges old steel, coatings, and settlement checks to modern obs and data flow thinking—wasn't sold on the quick corrosion-rate math, but it's a concise update.

    Saurabh Kumar G. · Content Manager Verified

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

  • You work in Oil & Gas Upstream or Pharmaceutical & Healthcare
  • You're a Chemical & Process / Mechanical Engineering professional
  • You prefer live, instructor-led training with Q&A

You should skip if

  • You need a different specialisation outside Chemical & Process
  • You need fully self-paced, on-demand content

Course details

To include types of tanks, tank degradation mechanisms, reasons for inspections difference between in-service and out of service Inspections calculations of shell thicknesses, minimum thickness required before failure, difference in bottom plate top side and bottom side corrosions, types of corrosions, methods of inspections and automations. Also In service and Out of service inspection techniques.


This course is combination of multiple modules, total 7 hours of course.

Course suitable for

Key topics covered

Types of Storage Tanks/ Selection Criteria

Design of Tank Terminal facilities

Tank Appurtenances/ Floating Roofs

Tank Degradation Mechanisms

Internal and External Corrosion

Reasons for Inspections

Routine Inservice Inspections

Out of Service Inspections

Tank Shell Plate thickness calculations

Bottom Plate Soil side and product side corrosions

Leak Detection Methods

Various Methods of tank Inspections

Differential Shell / Bottom settlement

Minimum Thickness Bottom Plate

API Std 653 Inspection Check Lists

Opportunities that await you!

Career opportunities

Training details

This is a live course that has a scheduled start date.

Why people choose EveryEng

Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities-all in a flexible and supportive environment.

What learners say about this course

Amit Mishra
Amit Mishra
May 3, 2026

The reasoning behind the examples held up when I sanity-checked them against day-to-day oilgas infra work. The chapter on API 653 shell-to-bottom weld inspection, especially the UT grid example and corrosion-rate calc before a hydrotest, stuck because it mirrors prod outage calls. It's mostly practical; wasn't sold on the quick skim of coatings failure modes, and I wished there was a bit more on obs during in-service inspections. Still, the pacing lays out a clear path from baseline inspection to confident sign-off without fluff.

Saurabh Kumar Gupta
Saurabh Kumar Gupta Content Manager
May 3, 2026

Coming from maintaining legacy infra, the course reframed tank inspection like refactoring old prod systems, and it's useful when you don't get to start greenfield. The API 653 Section 6 floor inspection walkthrough comparing MFL grid spacing to UT spot checks, including the missed edge corrosion example, stuck with me; I wished there was more on RBI tooling. It bridges old steel, coatings, and settlement checks to modern obs and data flow thinking—wasn't sold on the quick corrosion-rate math, but it's a concise update.

Shuvam Ray
Shuvam Ray Mechanical
May 3, 2026

Came in needing a cleaner mental picture of how the pump selection stack fits together across upstream oilgas projects, not just another checklist. The section on NPSH margin around the 32‑min mark, where they walk through vapor pressure shifts and show the knock-on effects on impeller trim, stuck with me because it mirrors issues we’ve seen in prod after a feed change. As a TeamLead, I liked how the course ties vendor curves back to arch decisions and infra constraints; it’s easier to align mech choices with ops and obs instead of tossing a PDF over the wall. The API 610 vs ISO callouts were practical, though I wasn't sold on how briefly seal plans were handled, especially for higher RPS cases. This wasn’t academic fluff, and I’ve already pointed a junior to the repo-style worksheets for PR review. mental models like this tend to age better than any single tool rev, which helps when budgets tighten.

Dr Surekha Prabhu
Dr Surekha Prabhu R & D | Drilling & Completion Fluid I Catalysis I Analytical Chemistry I Material Science I LLM Trainer
May 3, 2026

Section on NPSH margin calc vs vendor curves stuck; it's theory-to-practice for pump selection in oil & gas, wished more on API 610 failure modes.

₹2500

Early bird

Coming in Next Month

Questions and Answers

A: The GA controls spatial envelope and interference checks, which is where projection length bites you during inspection and maintenance. The schedule often feeds procurement and can lag late changes. Option B feels safe because API 650 does give minimums, but minimum code compliance doesn't override drawing precedence when access and insulation clearance are at stake. Option C sounds procedurally clean, yet treating every mismatch as a hard NCR two weeks from MC ignores document hierarchy used on EPC jobs. Option D leans on field reality, but accepting as-built without reconciling drawings breaks traceability and future inspection planning.

A: As water displaces air, any vent restriction converts fill rate into pressure rise. Thin shell tanks don't tolerate much. Option B mirrors pump troubleshooting instincts, but higher rate accelerates pressure rise. Option C sounds reasonable because water is incompressible, yet it's the trapped air pocket that sets the failure path. Option D mixes up sequences; vacuum becomes an issue on draining or cooling, not during an active fill with a blocked vent.

A: Conservation vents address breathing losses, overpressure, and vacuum scenarios. Option A and D sit squarely in that envelope. Option C is a classic vacuum case when pump-out outruns air ingress. Option B feels tempting because fire is a pressure driver, but shell buckling under fire is governed by heat weakening and external loads; a stuck vent doesn't shield you there.

A: Lap orientation affects crevice exposure and how water and sludge migrate, which steers corrosion. Option B borrows from fatigue logic, but bottom lap orientation doesn’t reclassify weld strength under static storage. Option C stretches geotechnical impact beyond reality; orientation doesn’t shift load distribution. Option D overstates NDT sensitivity; MFL can still read, but interpretation without correct orientation skews risk ranking.