<link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Caveat:wght@500;700&family=JetBrains+Mono:wght@400;500;600&display=swap" rel="stylesheet" /> Skip to main contentEngineering Courses, Mentoring & Jobs | EveryEng
How to kill vibrations of Vehicles thru’ the Best Power-train Mounting ? banner

How to kill vibrations of Vehicles thru’ the Best Power-train Mounting ?

How to kill vibrations of Vehicles thru’ the Best Power-train Mounting ? banner
Live online Intermediate

How to kill vibrations of Vehicles thru’ the Best Power-train Mounting ?

4(115)
2 enrolled
1006 views
COMPLETED

Tell us and we’ll notify you when the next batch is scheduled.

2 hrs
-
English
1006 views
MILIND AMBARDEKAR
MILIND AMBARDEKARConsultant
  • 7-day money-back guarantee
  • Session recordings included
  • Certificate of completion
Volume pricing for groups of 5+

Why enroll

If you are an engineer or automotive professional seeking to master vibration control in powertrain mounting, this course is for you.

You will gain practical insights into designing robust yet refined mounting solutions that balance NVH and durability. With real-world case studies and best practices, you’ll learn how to enhance ride comfort, improve component longevity, and solve complex vibration issues in modern vehicles.

Whether you're working with IC engines or electric motors, this course equips you with the essential knowledge to create quieter and smoother-performing vehicles.

What enrolled engineers say

2 verified reviews
  • May 3, 2026

    Easy to consume in chunks, which mattered between PRs and meetings, and the module boundaries made it painless to pause and resume. The section on hydraulic mount tuning, specifically the frequency sweep example in Chapter 3 where he walks through the free-body diagram and plots transmissibility vs engine order, stuck with me. That tied NVH theory back to real arch decisions instead of hand-waving, though I wasn't sold on the quick pass over durability tradeoffs. It stays mostly practical, with decent obs around how bad mounts show up downstream in vehicle feel, not just lab plots. I did wish there was more on test setup limits at higher RPS and how that skews interpretation, but that's a nit. the framing around mount selection feels reusable even as CAD tools and solver versions change, which is more than I get from most automotive courses.

    Harshith J. Verified
  • May 3, 2026

    the hydraulic mount tuning section that compares idle shake vs road boom using a simple frequency sweep example stuck with me. It's mostly practical for day-to-day NVH work in automotive, but I wasn't sold on the thin treatment of active mounts and wished there were more test data plots.

    Rohit J. Verified

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

  • You work in Automotive
  • You're a Noise & Vibration Engineering / Automobile Engineering professional
  • You have some foundational knowledge in the subject
  • You prefer live, instructor-led training with Q&A

You should skip if

  • You're looking for an introductory overview course
  • You need a different specialisation outside Noise & Vibration Engineering
  • You need fully self-paced, on-demand content

Course details

Understand the science and engineering behind designing effective powertrain mounting systems to minimize vehicle vibrations and enhance their NVH performance.

This course explores the critical role of powertrain mounting in controlling vibrations in both IC engine and electric vehicles. Topics include vibration isolation, damping, stiffness tuning, and optimization techniques using MBD analysis. Special considerations for electric motor mounting, conflicting durability vs. NVH requirements, and advancements like hydro-mounts and Active-mounts will also be covered.

Course suitable for

Opportunities that await you!

Career opportunities

Training details

This is a live course that has a scheduled start date.

Live session

Starts

Tue, Feb 18, 2025

2:30 PM UTC· your timezone

Duration

2 hours per day

Where this fits — what comes before, what comes next

COMPLETED

-

Questions and Answers

A: A. That would show up later as hardness drift and tear risk rather than the current NVH exceedance. B. That standard addresses machine health, not structure-borne path tuning. D. ASIL governs safety functions and diagnostics, not how much 2nd order torque ripple reaches the body. C. This requirement exists so mount properties are measured in a way that predicts installed transmissibility.

A: A. That failure mode needs sustained ozone exposure and time. B. That mechanism stiffens rubber and moves the problem the other way. D. That would show bond failure symptoms, not smooth rate drift. C. This mechanism exists because elastomer chemistry interacts with hydrocarbons and alters effective spring rate.

A: A. That would mask a root cause if the mount is mis-installed. B. That consumes time and doesn't address an assembly-induced rate shift. D. That test won't tell you why today's vehicle shakes at idle. C. This order exists because preload errors move the operating point of an otherwise in-spec mount.

A: A. That fault tracks vehicle speed, not engine order. B. That manifests as random excitation rather than a clean order. D. That failure mode requires clutch engagement. C. This explains the gear dependence and hot condition sensitivity.