<link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Caveat:wght@500;700&family=JetBrains+Mono:wght@400;500;600&family=Source+Serif+4:ital,opsz,wght@0,8..60,600;0,8..60,700;1,8..60,700&display=swap" rel="stylesheet" /> Skip to main contentEngineering Courses, Mentoring & Jobs | EveryEng
HVAC Drafting with AutoCAD – From Beginner to Pro! banner
Preview this course

HVAC Drafting with AutoCAD – From Beginner to Pro!

HVAC Drafting with AutoCAD – From Beginner to Pro! banner
Preview this course
Self-paced Intermediate

HVAC Drafting with AutoCAD – From Beginner to Pro!

4(161)
1 enrolled
2166 views
₹ 5000
492 min
Anytime
English
2166 views
Sajjad Ansari
Sajjad Ansari
  • 7-day money-back guarantee
  • Lifetime access
  • Certificate of completion

Why enroll

Participants choose this course because it helps them:

  1. Start from Zero – Even if they have no prior AutoCAD or HVAC knowledge, they can build skills step by step from beginner to professional level.

  2. Learn Industry Standards – Master drafting symbols, layers, annotations, and international standards used in real MEP projects.

  3. Gain Job-Oriented Skills – HVAC Drafting is one of the most in-demand skills for BIM Engineers, Draftsmen, and MEP Designers, making learners job-ready.

  4. Work on Real Projects – Hands-on exercises with HVAC layouts, ducting, piping, and section drawings ensure practical knowledge.

  5. Bridge Design & Execution – Understand how drawings are used on-site for installation and coordination with other MEP services.

  6. Boost Career Growth – Whether a student, fresher, or working professional, mastering HVAC drafting in AutoCAD opens opportunities in construction, consultancy, and design firms worldwide.

What enrolled engineers say

5 verified reviews
  • May 3, 2026

    it felt closer to a mentorship than a canned class, with the instructor thinking out loud through decisions. The moment in Section 5 where he rebuilds a duct layout using annotative blocks and layer states, then fixes a plotting issue in Paper Space, stuck with me. As someone bridging legacy CAD habits to modern workflows, it mapped well to how we refactor arch and infra in prod—it's small PRs, fewer surprises, cleaner obs. Mostly great, though I wasn't sold on the brief load calc aside and wished for a bit more on coordination with energyutilities.

    Aryan P. · Social Media Manager Verified
  • May 3, 2026

    The course doesn’t dodge the messy edges of HVAC drafting, which tracks with how this work actually shows up in prod. It felt less like a polished demo and more like reviewing a PR on someone else’s DWG, annotations off, layers half-right, and all. The bit in the duct sizing section where they walk through correcting a return air clash using XREFs and layer filters stuck with me; that’s a real Tuesday problem. I wasn’t sold on the AutoCAD setup chapter at first, but the layer naming convention tied back later when schedules started breaking, so fair enough. there’s a mild gap around handoff to BIM or how these drawings survive infra changes downstream; even a short aside would’ve helped. Still, it’s adjusted how I size effort and decide what to fix first instead of chasing every cosmetic issue.

    PAVAN D. Verified
  • May 3, 2026

    Reads like margin notes from someone who’s been through late-night revisions and redlines, not a sales pitch. As a TeamLead, I’m thinking about how fast juniors can get useful in the repo, and this mostly helps; the habits map well to how we review PRs and keep arch decisions boring so prod doesn’t wobble. The bit that stuck was Chapter 6 on layer standards and blocks, especially the moment he fixes a return-air tag that breaks xrefs across sheets and shows why naming upfront saves hours later. I wasn’t sold on the short AutoCAD UI tour, and I wished there was a little more on coordinating with energyutilities constraints, but the tradeoffs were explained. mostly the pacing works, and I’ve already folded a few checks into our informal CI for drawings. It nudged me past a plateau I’d been circling without adding infra bloat or extra cost.

    Premshankar S. Verified

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

  • You work in HVAC
  • You're a CAD & Analysis / Mechanical Engineering professional
  • You have some foundational knowledge in the subject
  • You prefer self-paced learning you can revisit

You should skip if

  • You're looking for an introductory overview course
  • You need a different specialisation outside CAD & Analysis
  • You need live interaction with an instructor

Course details

The HVAC Drafting with AutoCAD – From Beginner to Pro course is designed to provide comprehensive training for engineers, technicians, and drafting professionals who want to develop strong skills in creating professional HVAC drawings for building projects. This course covers the fundamentals of computer-aided design using the industry-standard software developed by Autodesk and focuses on its application in Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning system drafting. Participants will learn how to create accurate HVAC layout drawings including ducting systems, chilled water piping, equipment layouts, and ventilation plans.

The training begins with basic AutoCAD tools such as drawing commands, layers, blocks, annotations, and dimensioning, and gradually progresses to advanced HVAC drafting techniques such as duct routing, diffuser placement, schematic diagrams, and preparation of shop drawings. The course also introduces participants to reading HVAC design drawings, coordinating with architectural and MEP layouts, and preparing professional documentation used in real construction projects.

Course suitable for

Key topics covered

Module 01 Introduction to HVAC Systems

  • Overview of HVAC Systems

  • Components of HVAC Systems

  • Importance of HVAC in building design

Module 02 Fundamentals of CAD Software for HVAC Drafting

  • Introduction to CAD Software (AutoCAD)

  • Basic tools and commands for HVAC drafting

  • Creating and editing HVAC drawings

Module 03 HVAC Drawing Conventions & Symbols

  • Common Symbols used in HVAC drawings

  • Converting Architecture Plan in Gray Colour

Module 04 Heat Load Calculation

  • Heat Load Calculation as per Thumb Rule

Module 05 Placement of Air Terminal device

  • Sizing of Air terminal deviceClash checking and service coordination

  • Placement of Air terminal device

Module 06 Placement of Mechanical Equipment

  • Placement of Mechanical Equipment

Module 07 Ductwork Design

  • Single Line Ducting Layout

  • Duct Sizing by using McQuay Duct Sizer Software

  • Double Line Ducting Layout

  • Fresh air ducting Layout

  • Adding Insulation in Ductwork

  • Placement of Hanger & VCD

Module 08 Chilled Water Piping Design

  • Single line Chilled Water piping layout

  • Chilled Water Pipe Sizing

  • Double line Chilled Water piping layout

Module 09 Section Drawing

  • Section Drawing Layout

Module 10 HVAC Schematic Layout

  • Chilled Water Pipe Schematic Layout

Module 11 Creating Sheets & Title Block

  • Creating Sheets & Title Block

Course content

The course is readily available, allowing learners to start and complete it at their own pace.

11 modules24 lectures8 hr 12 min
  1. 1.1 Overview of HVAC Systems
    14 min
  2. 1.2 Components of HVAC Systems
    18 min
  3. 1.3 Importance of HVAC in building design
    15 min
  1. 2.1 Introduction to CAD Software (AutoCAD)
    20 min
  2. 2.2 Basic tools and commands for HVAC drafting
    7 min
  3. 2.3 Creating and editing HVAC drawings
    14 min
  1. 3.1 Common Symbols used in HVAC drawings
    24 min
  2. 3.2 Converting Architecture Plan in Gray Colour
    12 min

Opportunities that await you!

Skills & tools you'll gain

AutoCAD

Career opportunities

Where this fits — what comes before, what comes next

Why people choose EveryEng

Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities-all in a flexible and supportive environment.

What learners say about this course

Suresh Mohan
Suresh Mohan Manager
May 3, 2026

Few classes spell out the tradeoffs without sugarcoating; this one mostly does, which matters when the deliverable is a building that has to behave in prod. The pacing fit how I work as a freelancer: skim the arch, grab the infra implications, move on, no fluff. The moment that stuck was the alarm management section where they walk through deadband math for a chilled water loop and show why a 0.5°C choice explodes obs noise at scale; I’ve seen that exact mess at 2am. There’s practical stuff too, like the BACnet scheduling vs local controller clocks comparison and how it affects maintenance windows. wasn't sold on the brief PLC aside, and I wished there was more on commissioning checklists and energyutilities handoff, but that’s minor. I’ve already shared notes in our repo and flagged it as prereading before we lock the next BMS platform.

PAVAN DHIMAN
PAVAN DHIMAN
May 3, 2026

The course doesn’t dodge the messy edges of HVAC drafting, which tracks with how this work actually shows up in prod. It felt less like a polished demo and more like reviewing a PR on someone else’s DWG, annotations off, layers half-right, and all. The bit in the duct sizing section where they walk through correcting a return air clash using XREFs and layer filters stuck with me; that’s a real Tuesday problem. I wasn’t sold on the AutoCAD setup chapter at first, but the layer naming convention tied back later when schedules started breaking, so fair enough. there’s a mild gap around handoff to BIM or how these drawings survive infra changes downstream; even a short aside would’ve helped. Still, it’s adjusted how I size effort and decide what to fix first instead of chasing every cosmetic issue.

Avatar icon
Premshankar Singh
May 3, 2026

Reads like margin notes from someone who’s been through late-night revisions and redlines, not a sales pitch. As a TeamLead, I’m thinking about how fast juniors can get useful in the repo, and this mostly helps; the habits map well to how we review PRs and keep arch decisions boring so prod doesn’t wobble. The bit that stuck was Chapter 6 on layer standards and blocks, especially the moment he fixes a return-air tag that breaks xrefs across sheets and shows why naming upfront saves hours later. I wasn’t sold on the short AutoCAD UI tour, and I wished there was a little more on coordinating with energyutilities constraints, but the tradeoffs were explained. mostly the pacing works, and I’ve already folded a few checks into our informal CI for drawings. It nudged me past a plateau I’d been circling without adding infra bloat or extra cost.

Vipul Gupta
Vipul Gupta
May 3, 2026

Chapter 5 duct layer naming saved rework across arch handoffs; it's mostly practical, though I wasn't sold on the block library choices.

₹5000

Access anytime

Questions and Answers

A: A: Without an access door, you can’t legally or practically reset or inspect the damper. That’s a real failure mode. B: Seal failure happens regardless of access; the door doesn’t stop smoke leakage. C: Pressure drop is set by damper geometry and blade position, not by whether an access door is drawn. This one mixes operations with drafting. D: Happens all the time — site cuts ducts when access isn’t shown, and the fire rating is gone.

A: Flow divided by velocity gives area: 1.2 / 6 = 0.20 m². A: 0.20 m² exactly, but ignores liner and flange loss — looks right but isn’t what you’d actually draft. B: 0.18 m², close enough once lining is added. C: Same area as B, but extreme aspect ratio raises pressure drop. D: Same trick again — velocity noise and fittings will kill you.

A: A: Too thin — surface temp will sit below dew point and sweat. Seen it fail. B: 25 mm typically pushes surface temp above room dew point in this delta-T. That’s why specs land here. C: Works thermally but overshoots the need and eats space; rarely justified at 7 °C. D: Paint doesn’t change surface temperature; condensation still forms.

A: A: Flex connectors exist mainly to break vibration paths. Missing it sends vibration everywhere. B: Structure-borne noise rides the same path. C: Thermal expansion of short duct runs isn’t what flex connectors are solving; wrong mechanism. D: Installers rely on that bit of give to line things up.