Skip to main contentEngineering Courses, Mentoring & Jobs | EveryEng
Introduction to Different Types of Oil Rigs banner

Introduction to Different Types of Oil Rigs

Introduction to Different Types of Oil Rigs banner
Live online Basic

Introduction to Different Types of Oil Rigs

4(69)
103 enrolled
3527 views
COMPLETED

Tell us and we’ll notify you when the next batch is scheduled.

1 hrs
-
3527 views
Team OG
Team OGUpstream Oil & Gas Technical Professional
  • Session recordings included
  • Certificate of completion

What enrolled engineers say

6 verified reviews
  • May 3, 2026

    Dense, relevant content. The real-world examples made it stick.

    SARTHAK C. Verified
  • May 3, 2026

    Clear breakdown of jack-up vs semi-submersible in the 'Mooring and Station Keeping' chapter, especially the animation contrasting preload legs with dynamic positioning. It's practical context for oilgas newcomers, but I wasn't sold on the light treatment of failure modes; I've seen ops hinge on weather windows and maintenance details that weren't covered.

    Alam P. Verified
  • May 3, 2026

    No fluff, good labs. The async and concurrency sections are the standout.

    Soham G. Verified

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

  • You work in Oil & Gas Upstream
  • You're a Petroleum Technology professional
  • You prefer live, instructor-led training with Q&A

You should skip if

  • You need a different specialisation outside Petroleum Technology
  • You need fully self-paced, on-demand content

Course details

This course will introduce the audience to the various different types of Oil Rigs which are used to extract Oil & Gas from their reservoirs deep inside the rock formations below the earth's surface.

About Trainer - The trainer team are well experienced and based at multiple locations (India, USA, Canada & Singapore). They have gained excellent achievements in their professional journey and it will be a great opportunity to directly interact with them.

Course suitable for

Key topics covered

Drilling Rig & Production Rig: Requirements

Land Rig

Types of Offshore Rigs

Drilling Ships and Barges

Floating Production, Storage and Offloading (FPSO) system

Opportunities that await you!

Career opportunities

Training details

This is a live course that has a scheduled start date.

Live session

Starts

Sat, Mar 30, 2024

4:00 AM UTC· your timezone

Duration

1 hour per day

Why people choose EveryEng

Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities-all in a flexible and supportive environment.

What learners say about this course

Muzammil Maseehuddin Ahmed
Muzammil Maseehuddin Ahmed
May 3, 2026

The ESP sizing walkthrough in Chapter 3 bridged textbook curves to field prod; it's mostly clear, though nodal analysis coverage felt thin.

Avatar icon
Jeffry Jose
May 3, 2026

Felt closer to a guided mentorship than a boxed lecture, which worked for bridging old oilgas practices to how we talk today. Small gripe up front: module 4 jumps from 1930s wildcatting to postwar offshore a bit fast; I had to pause and sketch the timeline myself. After that, it clicks. The section on the Spindletop blowout control methods, then tying it to later offshore safety regs, stuck with me. Helpful parallels to modern arch reviews and infra obs, without forcing k8s analogies. I've used the casing vs completion vocabulary from chapter 6 in design sessions already, and fewer sidebars to define terms.

Arunpandiyan Balasubramanian
Arunpandiyan Balasubramanian
May 3, 2026

Refreshing to see the why behind the how, not just timelines and dates. As a grad entrant, I kept mapping the oilgas history back to stuff we argue about in arch reviews; the Chapter 3 bit on Spindletop, especially the minute where they pause on why rotary drilling beat cable tools, stuck with me. That moment clicked with how infra choices in prod get locked in early, kind of like a repo decision that haunts CI later. The section on seismic reflection in the 1920s was another anchor, with that field note screenshot showing noisy traces and early obs limits. I wasn't sold on how briefly decline curves were treated; a quick contrast to modern RPS forecasting would've helped. still, the throughline from exploration risk to ops habits landed. It's changed how I frame technical debt chats at work, less abstract, more grounded in how constraints accrete over time.

sarath Selvaraj
sarath Selvaraj Offshore Construction Engineer
May 3, 2026

Dense material without the fluff; it moves fast but stays readable. The Module 3 casing vs tubing section, especially the burst/collapse walk-through using API 5CT grades, stuck with me because it mirrors spec reviews I see before prod changes. I've already used that framing to sanity-check a client’s arch decisions on connections and weights, which saved a back-and-forth. Wasn't sold on the brief metallurgy pass; wished there was more on sour service failures and photos.

COMPLETED

-

Questions and Answers

A: That's the most common mistake — stopping at water depth. The difference matters because jack-up legs are continuous columns carrying hull weight above wave crest. Start with 75 m water depth, add 15 m air gap, add ~10 m penetration, then tack on a modest allowance for storm crest and hull chord. You land in the 120 m range without doing any vendor-specific calcs.

A: That's the most common mistake — over-weighting heave alone. The difference matters because at 2,200 m you’re constrained by riser management, logistics, and relocation risk. Semi-subs behave well, but extended testing and current variability push you toward a drillship with higher DP redundancy and faster move-off capability.

A: That's the most common mistake — assuming settlement stays symmetric. The difference matters because punch-through is a rapid loss of bearing in one leg, not a global issue. That asymmetry drives hull inclination, leg bending, and can cascade into jacking system damage before operators can correct.

A: That's the most common mistake — jumping straight to drilling hardware. The difference matters because mooring defines station integrity. If line tensions at draft don’t match the analysis, every downstream system is operating on a false assumption.