Skip to main contentEngineering Courses, Mentoring & Jobs | EveryEng
NDT ( RT ) Level II banner

NDT ( RT ) Level II

NDT ( RT ) Level II banner
Live online Beginner

NDT ( RT ) Level II

4(53)
377 views
₹ 499
2 hrs
Next month
English
377 views
Chaitanya Purohit
Chaitanya PurohitConsultant
  • 7-day money-back guarantee
  • Session recordings included
  • Certificate of completion

Why enroll

Achieving NDT (RT) Level II certification can significantly enhance your career in non-destructive testing, leading to roles like Senior NDT Technician, Quality Control Inspector, or Testing Engineer, with median salaries ranging from $85,000 to over $140,000. With this advanced certification, you'll demonstrate expertise in radiographic testing, enabling you to interpret complex radiographs, develop testing procedures, and supervise others. This certification will also open up opportunities for leadership roles, consulting, and specialized inspection services, particularly in industries like aerospace, energy, and manufacturing, where radiographic testing is critical for ensuring product integrity and reliability. You'll be highly sought after for your ability to detect internal defects and anomalies.

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

  • You work in Oil & Gas Upstream or Aerospace
  • You're a Mechanical Engineering / Metallurgy & Material Science professional
  • You prefer live, instructor-led training with Q&A

You should skip if

  • You need a different specialisation outside Mechanical Engineering
  • You need fully self-paced, on-demand content

Course details

This course is designed for individuals aiming to achieve Level II certification in Radiographic Testing (RT). It provides an advanced understanding of RT principles, techniques, and applications, focusing on preparing students to perform, supervise, and interpret radiographic inspections effectively. The course integrates theoretical instruction with practical demonstrations to ensure proficiency in using RT equipment and adhering to industry standards.

Course suitable for

Key topics covered

  1. Introduction to Radiographic Testing (RT)

    • Principles of Radiography

    • Types of Radiation: X-rays and Gamma rays

    • Physics of Radiographic Inspection

  2. Radiographic Safety

    • Radiation Safety and Protection Protocols

    • Handling and Storage of Radioactive Materials

    • Safety Procedures and Equipment

    • Regulatory Standards and Compliance (e.g., OSHA, NRC)

  3. RT Equipment and Techniques

    • Radiographic Equipment Overview (X-ray Machines, Gamma Ray Sources)

    • Film and Digital Radiography Systems

    • Exposure and Development Techniques

    • Image Quality Indicators (IQIs)

    • Non-film Radiographic Techniques (e.g., digital radiography, computed tomography)

  4. Film Processing and Interpretation

    • Film Processing Techniques (Manual and Automatic)

    • Radiograph Evaluation (Density, Contrast, Resolution)

    • Detection and Classification of Defects

    • Interpreting Radiographic Images for Defects (Cracks, Porosity, Welds)

  5. Inspection Procedure and Reporting

    • Test Preparation and Set-up

    • Radiographic Testing Procedure (RTP)

    • Inspection Documentation and Reporting Standards

    • Quality Control and Record Keeping

  6. Radiographic Testing Codes, Standards, and Specifications

    • Industry Codes (ASME, ASTM, ISO, API, etc.)

    • Compliance with National and International Standards

    • RT Application in Various Industries (Oil & Gas, Aerospace, Manufacturing)

Opportunities that await you!

Career opportunities

Training details

This is a live course that has a scheduled start date.

Why people choose EveryEng

Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities-all in a flexible and supportive environment.

What learners say about this course

Anoop V
Anoop V PIPING LEAD
May 3, 2026

This feels like the reference you open when the machine arch starts wobbling and prod alerts chirp, not a glossy intro. The Chapter 3 lab comparing time-domain plots to FFT windowing, especially the bearing outer-race fault example, stuck and maps cleanly to what I've seen on legacy rigs and newer sensors feeding obs dashboards. mostly it bridges old-school vibration math to modern infra without hype, though I wasn't sold on the brief treatment of automotive NVH and wished for one more failure case. The labs carried it, with data you can rerun from the repo.

ADITHYA POCHE
ADITHYA POCHE
May 3, 2026

FFT basics section using the imbalance vs misalignment spectrum example stuck; it's good, but wished there was more on bearing fault frequencies.

Yogendra Sagar Mishra
Yogendra Sagar Mishra
May 3, 2026

Useful bridge from legacy status updates to modern PR writeups—the 'BLUF email' section, it's practical, though I wished more on async feedback in prod incidents.

Avatar icon
Charu Humane
May 3, 2026

Short, practical reps—like the Chapter 2 'Status Update Rewrite' where you cut a rambling Slack into a 5-bullet PR summary, kept it useful between meetings. It's beginner-level, mostly, but I've already used the 'ask-back' checklist in a prod incident review; wished there was more on async comms across infra/k8s teams.

₹499

₹0 Early bird

Coming in Next Month

Questions and Answers

A: That's the most common mistake — jumping straight into IQI or weld quality calls. Density comes first because without acceptable optical density, sensitivity claims are meaningless and any later interpretation gets thrown out during audit.

A: That's the most common mistake — assuming image quality alone governs method choice. Logistics and power availability dominate here, and codes allow gamma where access and infrastructure limit X-ray use.

A: That's the most common mistake — thinking quality loss is the worst case. The barrier exists to protect people, and once dose control is lost you're into reportable regulatory territory fast.

A: That's the most common mistake — treating IQI location as a preference. Placement affects sensitivity, and deviations need explicit code justification or the shot fails audit.