Skip to main contentEngineering Courses, Mentoring & Jobs | EveryEng
Pressure Vessel Design – Understand Different Code & it’s requirements banner
Pressure Vessel Design – Understand Different Code & it’s requirements banner
Live Online Class Beginner

Pressure Vessel Design – Understand Different Code & it’s requirements

3(70)
4360 views
COMPLETED

Tell us and we’ll notify you when the next batch is scheduled.

5 hrs
Next month
English
4360 views
Shanmugam V
Shanmugam VLead / Senior Mechanical Engineer/Static Equipment Engineer
  • 7-day money-back guarantee
  • Session recordings included
  • Foundational Learning
  • Access to Study Materials

Why enroll

1. How elementary and advanced topics of Solid mechanics are applied in development of Pressure vessel codes and standards.

2. Theoretical background behind design code requirements which helps an engineer understand the strengths, weaknesses and applicability of the code requirements.

3. An insight into the newly introduced codes.

4. Bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge and code requirements.

5. University students who want to take up career in static equipment engineering and wants to learn about the most widely used Industrial standard.

6. Experienced engineers who want to understand the background of code rules and requirements

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

  • You work in Oil & Gas Upstream or Pharmaceutical & Healthcare
  • You're a Mechanical Engineering / Metallurgy & Material Science professional
  • You prefer live, instructor-led training with Q&A

You should skip if

  • You need a different specialisation outside Mechanical Engineering
  • You need fully self-paced, on-demand content

Course details

This course will cover basic and advanced topics of Pressure Vessel Engineering Design and Manufacturing requirement to provide a robust understanding of the background theory behind technical requirements of Pressure Vessel codes and standards. This will serve as a refresher course on core and advanced topics of Pressure Vessel Engineering to understand technical background of design and analysis as per codes & standards.


This course covers all important aspects of Pressure Vessel Design, Fabrication and testing, which comprises of
• Design, Analysis and Engineering requirement for Pressure Vessel
• Metallurgy and Material Selection while designing Pressure vessel
• Fabrication prerequisite while Pressure Vessel engineering
• Heat Treatment requirement for Pressure Vessel
• Testing & Inspection essentials for Pressure Vessel Design


All of above topics are covered in different modules of this course hence we encourage you to enroll all modules to learn all major and critical areas of Pressure vessel engineering.
Classifications of Static Equipment Engineering is a specialized discipline of Mechanical Engineering which covers the design of static equipments like Pressure vessels (Process Columns, Drums, Reactors, Separators, Drain vessel), Heat exchangers (Shell and Tube, Plate and Frame, Plate and Shell, Air Coolers), Atmospheric Tanks (Low pressure and LPG Tanks), Flare Stack in chemical, petrochemical, or hydrocarbon facilities. We have different courses to cover above listed equipment & do participate in all courses.

Course suitable for

Key topics covered

1. Understand Different Code & it’s requirements

a. ASME Section VIII DIV 1 / 2 / 3 Standards

b. Dimensional Standards

c. Material Standards

d. Pipe thickness

e. Flange Standards

f. Fitting Standards

Opportunities that await you!

Career opportunities

Training details

This is a live course that has a scheduled start date.

Why people choose EveryEng

Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities-all in a flexible and supportive environment.

COMPLETED

Coming in Next Month

Questions and Answers

A: Option A walks the code path most people forget under pressure. P = 3.0 MPa, R = 1.0 m, S = 138 MPa, E = 0.85 gives a raw thickness just over 17 mm, then you add 3 mm CA to land at ~20 mm. B feels reasonable if you're used to piping rules, but ASME VIII applies E inside the pressure formula, not as a post-add. C borrows thin-wall logic from heat exchangers and quietly swaps diameter basis, shaving metal you don't actually have. D sounds conservative, yet Div 1 doesn't let you hand-wave E away; doing so double-counts safety in some spots and misses it in others.

A: A jumps out once you slow down and map symbols to code language. A fillet weld on a pressure-retaining nozzle contradicts a stated full-pen requirement, and UW-16 doesn’t give you wiggle room. B is a trap people fall into on brownfields, assuming notes magically fix geometry. They don’t. C leans on hydro as a cure-all, ignoring that code compliance is checked before pressure ever hits steel. D isn’t wrong in general, but here it sidesteps the direct mismatch between symbol and requirement.

A: A reflects basic gas law behavior that’s easy to forget when alarms chirp. A sealed gas volume will climb with temperature, and controlled venting keeps stress where intended. B feels safe, but you’d be chasing ghosts and extending outage for no gain. C ignores that test pressure limits are absolute, not average-over-time suggestions. D sounds proactive, yet adding hardware mid-test creates new failure paths and isn’t what the code expects during controlled pneumatic testing.

A: A is the quick sanity check that keeps you from embarrassing crane calls. Shell area ~113 m², plus heads gets you near 135 m²; multiply by 0.022 m and density and you land around mid‑40 tonnes. B drops length from the math by accident, something piping folks sometimes do. C piles on allowances that belong in installed weight, not bare vessel. D overestimates because a solid cylinder ignores that most of the volume is empty process space.