Skip to main contentEngineering Courses, Mentoring & Jobs | EveryEng
Root Cause Analysis & Problem Solving banner

Root Cause Analysis & Problem Solving

Root Cause Analysis & Problem Solving banner
Live online Beginner

Root Cause Analysis & Problem Solving

4(53)
462 views
COMPLETED

Tell us and we’ll notify you when the next batch is scheduled.

2 hrs
-
English
462 views
Chaitanya Purohit
Chaitanya PurohitConsultant
  • 7-day money-back guarantee
  • Session recordings included
  • Certificate of completion

Why enroll

Participants join the Root Cause Analysis course to develop practical problem-solving skills that help identify and eliminate the underlying causes of recurring issues. It enables them to improve operational efficiency, enhance quality, and prevent future incidents. The course is ideal for managers, engineers, and quality professionals aiming to make data-driven, effective decisions in their organizations.

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

  • You work in Oil & Gas Upstream or Aerospace
  • You're a Chemical & Process / Mechanical Engineering professional
  • You prefer live, instructor-led training with Q&A

You should skip if

  • You need a different specialisation outside Chemical & Process
  • You need fully self-paced, on-demand content

Course details

This course provides a comprehensive understanding of Root Cause Analysis, a systematic approach to identifying the underlying causes of problems and incidents in organizations. Participants will learn how to investigate issues effectively, distinguish symptoms from root causes, and apply structured problem-solving techniques. The program covers various RCA tools and methodologies, including the 5 Whys, Fishbone (Ishikawa) diagrams, and fault tree analysis. Emphasis is placed on practical application, helping participants develop the skills to prevent recurrence of problems. The course also explores data collection, analysis, and reporting methods to support informed decision-making. Case studies and real-world examples are used to illustrate the RCA process in action. Participants will gain insights into improving operational efficiency, safety, and quality through proactive problem resolution. The course is designed for managers, engineers, quality professionals, and anyone involved in process improvement. By the end of the program, learners will be able to implement RCA techniques confidently within their organizations. Overall, the course equips participants with tools to enhance problem-solving effectiveness and organizational performance.

Course suitable for

Key topics covered

  • Introduction to Root Cause Analysis (RCA)

  • Fundamental Concepts of RCA

  • RCA Methodologies and Tools

  • Data Collection and Analysis

  • Identifying the Root Cause

  • Corrective and Preventive Actions

  • Human Factors in Root Cause Analysis

  • Analyzing Complex Systems and Failures

  • Integrating RCA into Continuous Improvement Programs

  • Reporting and Communicating RCA Findings

Opportunities that await you!

Career opportunities

Training details

This is a live course that has a scheduled start date.

Why people choose EveryEng

Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities-all in a flexible and supportive environment.

What learners say about this course

Yogendra Sagar Mishra
Yogendra Sagar Mishra
May 3, 2026

Labs assume you’ve already got a note-taking setup; lost a few minutes wrangling that. After that, the exercises forced me to face some sloppy habits, especially jumping to solutions before framing the problem. The Constraint Ladder in Week 3 stuck with me; writing the first arch sketch, then deleting half of it, felt like a PR review in slow motion. Useful tie-ins to day job stuff—how this shows up in prod incidents, or when a CI failure sends you chasing noise. It’s beginner-level, but not fluffy. Short videos, lots of doing. I’ve already changed how I size tasks and decide what actually needs attention vs. what can wait.

ADITHYA POCHE
ADITHYA POCHE
May 3, 2026

FFT basics section using the imbalance vs misalignment spectrum example stuck; it's good, but wished there was more on bearing fault frequencies.

Yogendra Sagar Mishra
Yogendra Sagar Mishra
May 3, 2026

Sat through plenty of intro courses; this one actually has teeth. The Module 2 walkthrough on cold vs hot commissioning—especially the FAT/SAT handoff and interlock verification before first power-on—stuck, because it mapped cleanly to prod cutover with obs checks tied back to the infra arch. Some pacing felt rushed, and I wasn't sold on the quiz gating, but the checklists translate straight to a repo PR or runbook. Walking away with fewer open questions and answers I'm more confident shipping.

Avatar icon
Charu Humane
May 3, 2026

Short, practical reps—like the Chapter 2 'Status Update Rewrite' where you cut a rambling Slack into a 5-bullet PR summary, kept it useful between meetings. It's beginner-level, mostly, but I've already used the 'ask-back' checklist in a prod incident review; wished there was more on async comms across infra/k8s teams.

COMPLETED

-

Questions and Answers

A: A: Needs sustained CO2 partial pressure and velocity; the dead-leg geometry kills that driver. B: Air ingress would pit randomly, not track the 6 o'clock sediment line. C: Matches stagnant brine, solids settling, FeS films, and localized thinning exactly where deposits sit. D: CS doesn't crack this way; that's an austenitic stainless failure mode.

A: A: A bad LT doesn't explain foam or off-spec oil. B: High momentum shreds the interface, creates foam, drives carryover, and pushes level unstable. C: Weir issues bias steady-state levels but don't suddenly create foam. D: PSV activity is intermittent and external to the liquid separation physics.

A: A: Uses the right equation, right diameter basis, and keeps E in play. B: Nominal thickness is gone; you can't count metal that's already corroded. C: Seamless assumption breaks the actual weld reality on a brownfield shell. D: OD basis and no temp derate both inflate pressure capacity.

A: A: Too low; you wouldn't hear or feel much. B: Ignores liquid flashing and density collapse. C: Flashing service routinely lands here and excites supports. D: Sonic assumptions don't hold in short, liquid-fed drains.