Skip to main contentEngineering Courses, Mentoring & Jobs | EveryEng
Sheet Metal Product- Development Process. banner

Sheet Metal Product- Development Process.

Sheet Metal Product- Development Process. banner
Live online Basic

Sheet Metal Product- Development Process.

4(15)
1 enrolled
3663 views
COMPLETED

Tell us and we’ll notify you when the next batch is scheduled.

2 hrs
-
3663 views
AALOK SHARMA
AALOK SHARMADirector- Business Development - AAAS Industries / Sheet Metal/ Project Management
  • 7-day money-back guarantee
  • Session recordings included
  • Certificate of completion

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

  • You work in Automotive
  • You're a Mechanical Engineering professional
  • You prefer live, instructor-led training with Q&A

You should skip if

  • You need a different specialisation outside Mechanical Engineering
  • You need fully self-paced, on-demand content

Course details

In this course, We will learn about the Drawing Study - how to achieve Product tolerances, Required Process for same and Product Cost.

Basics of Tool Design , Welding Fixture Design and Line Layout , Time Study.

Course suitable for

Opportunities that await you!

Career opportunities

Training details

This is a live course that has a scheduled start date.

Live session

Starts

Sun, Sep 4, 2022

6:00 AM UTC· your timezone

Duration

2 hours per day

Course Attachments

PPT.pptx

Why people choose EveryEng

Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities-all in a flexible and supportive environment.

What learners say about this course

Swaminathan Nagarajan
Swaminathan Nagarajan Deputy Manager - Project Procurement
May 3, 2026

Good bridge from spreadsheet-era costing to how prod teams think today; the Module 2 step-down overhead allocation at the automotive plant stuck, especially the scrap-rate tweak. I've used that math in a PR for a new prod line, though I wasn't sold on the brief learning-curve coverage—wished there was more on capacity constraints.

aayush agarwal
aayush agarwal Engineer
May 3, 2026

The framing around testability in a costing context went further than I expected, tying assumptions to checks instead of vibes. It bridges legacy spreadsheet thinking with a more modern flow: cost models treated like code, with PRs, CI gates, and a notion of prod parity that made sense to me. The bit that stuck was the BOM Rollups and Yield Loss section, specifically the example where a 2% scrap tweak flipped margin after the variance waterfall at ~18:30; I’ve already mirrored that check in a repo. As someone bouncing between old ERP exports and newer infra, the arch conversations landed, even if the obs angle was mostly light. wasn't sold on how overhead allocation stopped short of multi-plant scenarios; I wished there was more there, especially for automotive suppliers. Still, I’m more comfortable making calls about cost architecture now, and defending them when finance asks why the numbers changed.

Avatar icon
Issa Bilal
May 3, 2026

Clear pass on fundamentals; Chapter 3's BOM roll-up with scrap-rate math mirrors how prod books COGS, and the spreadsheet maps cleanly to a repo. It's mostly right-sized for beginner/intermediate, though I wasn't sold on the overhead allocation shortcut in Section 5 and wished there was more on variance tracking once RPS spikes.

Amol Badekar
Amol Badekar
May 3, 2026

Practical walkthroughs, especially the Chapter 3 bend allowance vs K‑factor worksheet and the DXF flat pattern export, map cleanly to prod shop constraints in automotive brackets. It's efficient for freelancers quoting jobs, though I wasn't sold on the skim of tolerance stack‑ups—wished there was more on hemming failures before release to fab.

COMPLETED

-

Questions and Answers

A: 1.7 kg is the sanity check value. Area 0.18 m² times thickness 0.0012 m gives volume 2.16e-4 m³. Multiply by 7850 kg/m³ and you're at ~1.7 kg. The trap is skipping thickness or pre-loading scrap before you even have nesting.

A: 0.2–0.5 mm is where e-coat and weld distortion live, so sequence matters. The drawing controls the delivered state. Material thickness is a prerequisite check, but flatness must be verified on the coated assembly using the defined datums, not an earlier manufacturing state.

A: 2.4 mm is the gatekeeper number. θ is π/2 radians. R is 1.5 mm and K·T is 0.5 mm, so effective radius ~2.0 mm. Multiply by 1.57 and you land near 2.4 mm. Most errors come from degrees or neutral axis assumptions from stamping.

A: 0.3–0.5 mm/year local loss is the danger zone here. Chipped paint plus salt spray sets up crevices and underfilm attack. Uniform corrosion assumes immersion, and oxidation needs heat you don't have underfloor.