The Green Energy Transition: Sustainability, Carbon Capture, Green Hydrogen & Green Chemicals for a Better Tomorrow
Tell us and we’ll notify you when the next batch is scheduled.
- 7-day money-back guarantee
- Session recordings included
- Certificate of completion
Why enroll
Is this course for you?
You should take this if
- You work in Renewable & New Energy or Energy & Utilities
- You're a Environment & Sustainability (ESG) / Chemical & Process professional
- You have some foundational knowledge in the subject
- You prefer live, instructor-led training with Q&A
You should skip if
- You're looking for an introductory overview course
- You need a different specialisation outside Environment & Sustainability (ESG)
- You need fully self-paced, on-demand content
Course details
Course suitable for
Opportunities that await you!
Career opportunities
Training details
This is a live course that has a scheduled start date.
Live session
Starts
Sat, Mar 22, 2025
Duration
1 hour per day
Why people choose EveryEng
Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities-all in a flexible and supportive environment.
What learners say about this course
Great
Coming from software, this course reframed an old control problem the way refactoring a legacy service does: same constraints, clearer mental model. The walk through the ISA sizing equation, especially the Cv vs Kv example with water at 60°F, stuck because it mirrored how I sanity-check RPS assumptions in prod before a PR lands. I liked the section on flashing vs cavitation; the pressure drop chart felt like reading infra limits instead of hand-wavy arch talk, and it clicked fast. As a beginner track it mostly lands, though I wasn't sold on how briefly valve trim selection was handled; a few more edge cases would help folks crossing over from chemicalpharmaceutical or energyutilities. The pacing works for between-meeting study, and the exercises felt closer to CI checks than homework. I've already reused the sizing worksheet like a repo snippet, which is saying something.
Module 4 dragged a bit, and the homework assumes you’re already fluent in Excel Solver. That aside, the selection logic is what pulled me in: the decision trees for choosing shell-and-tube vs plate in Chapter 2, especially the LMTD vs ε‑NTU fork with the fouling factor example at minute ~18. As someone who thinks in arch diagrams and failure modes, mapping thermal constraints the way we map infra tradeoffs clicked. The counterflow vs parallel-flow section tied pressure drop back to maintenance in a way I’ve actually seen in chemicalpharmaceutical plants. it wasn’t fluffy, and it didn’t pretend everyone’s starting from zero. I’ve already bookmarked the pinch-temperature walkthrough for quick reference between meetings.
Needed material that wouldn’t fall apart under a PR-level sanity check, and this mostly held. The LMTD vs ε-NTU section, especially the shell-and-tube example where fouling factors changed sizing, stuck with me and maps well to how I think about legacy arch versus modern constraints. It connects old plant math to how I reason about infra tradeoffs in prod, even if the plate exchanger coverage felt light. still, it trimmed a lot of mental tech debt I’d been carrying from chemicalpharmaceutical work.