Design of Pressure Vessel using PV Elite – Different Component Design Requirement & it’s impact
Design of Pressure Vessel using PV Elite – Different Component Design Requirement & it’s impact
- 7-day money-back guarantee
- Session recordings included
- Certificate of completion
Why enroll
What enrolled engineers say
Between client calls, this course clicked a few things about how small design choices ripple into performance. The nozzle reinforcement walk-through in the UG-37 check, plus the PV Elite wind/seismic combo example, stuck; seeing the stress ratio jump when skirt thickness moved 2 mm was concrete. Mostly practical, though I wasn't sold on the brief corrosion allowance bit—wished there was more on energyutilities cases in prod reviews. I've bookmarked it as a reference for future arch reviews.
Came in to sanity-check it for an L&D spend and picked up more than expected, especially bridging hand calcs we inherited with how PV Elite fits into a modern arch. The nozzle reinforcement lab using ASME VIII Div 1 UG‑37, plus the WRC 107 vs 537 comparison, stuck because I could map it straight to a recent oilgas PR sitting in our repo. It wasn't sold on the lighter treatment of wind/seismic combos; wished there was more on how folks wire checks into CI before prod. still, the labs felt closest to real infra work, not slides.
Good bridge from legacy hand calcs to PV Elite screens; the UG‑37 nozzle reinforcement walkthrough with the live MAWP iteration stuck, especially seeing how corrosion allowance shifts results for oilgas vessels. Mostly works, but I wasn't sold on the saddle support section—wished there was more on wind/seismic load cases beyond the default assumptions; it's thin.
Your instructor
Shanmugam V
Pr Engineer
Lead / Senior Mechanical Engineer/Static Equipment Engineer
Is this course for you?
You should take this if
- You work in Oil & Gas Downstream or Energy & Utilities
- You're a Mechanical Engineering / Piping & Layout Engineering professional
- You have some foundational knowledge in the subject
- You prefer live, instructor-led training with Q&A
You should skip if
- You're looking for an introductory overview course
- You need a different specialisation outside Mechanical Engineering
- You need fully self-paced, on-demand content
Course details
Course suitable for
Key topics covered
Opportunities that await you!
Skills & tools you'll gain
Career opportunities
Training details
This is a live course that has a scheduled start date.
Why people choose EveryEng
Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities-all in a flexible and supportive environment.
What learners say about this course
Our team’s been circling a few vessel design choices lately, so a beginner pass through this helped anchor the codes. The walk-through comparing ASME Section VIII Div 1 vs Div 2, especially the MAWP calc using joint efficiency Table UW-12, stuck because I could map it to checks we’d flag in an arch review. wasn't sold on how briefly fatigue is handled—would’ve liked a short bridge to Div 2 methods or FEA assumptions for oilgas cases. I'll keep this bookmarked for the next arch review.
Curriculum looked heavy on codes, but delivery stayed lean and to the point. The walk-through in the ASME Section VIII Div 1 chapter, especially the UG-27 shell thickness example with allowable stress tables, stuck because it mirrors the calcs I still see in prod reviews. It doesn't oversell Div 2, which is fine for a beginner track, though I wasn't sold on how lightly hydrotest considerations were handled. Rare to see training map this cleanly to day-to-day work in energyutilities—close enough to what lands in a PR.
Came in expecting production‑grade patterns, but it’s framed for beginners and that’s fine. The ASME Section VIII Div 1 walkthrough, especially the UG‑27 thickness calc example with units spelled out, stuck because I can sanity‑check numbers during design reviews. it's practical enough to map to our review checklist in prod, though I wasn’t sold on how briefly fatigue got treated—wished there was a bit more on cyclic loads we see in energyutilities. I’ve already flagged a few assumptions to revisit on current vessels.
Useful refresher on pressure vessel material choices, especially the chapter walking through ASME Section II‑D allowables inside COMPRESS and the UCS‑66 impact exemption example—it matched decisions I make in client work. mostly practical, though I wasn't sold on the short treatment of corrosion allowance vs temperature; wished there was more on low‑temp service checks.
Oct 2, 2026 
