EPC Project Planning & Control - Scope Preparation, monitoring and control project delay

EPC Project Planning & Control - Scope Preparation, monitoring and control project delay

Raju Makadia

Specialist Engineer - Project Controls (Planning & Cost)

$ 286

40 already enrolled!

Basic course for beginners

Opportunities that awaits you!

Earn a course completion certificate

Add this credential to your LinkedIn profile, resume, or CV. Share it on social media and in your performance review

Career opportunities

Course details

A project plan is a series of formal documents that define the execution and control stages of a project. The plan includes considerations for risk management, resource management and communications, while also addressing scope, cost and schedule baselines. Project planning is a discipline addressing how to complete a project in a certain timeframe, usually with defined stages and designated resources. One view of project planning divides the activity into these steps: setting measurable objectives. identifying deliverables. Various Project planning software are used by project control engineers and project managers to ensure that their plans are thorough and robust. This course provides the necessary knowledge of theoretical & practical aspect of various applications that used for project planning as per international best practice & standard.

Course suitable for

Oil & Gas
Pharmaceutical & Healthcare
Energy & Utilities
Rail & Transport
All Discipline

Training details

This is a live course that has a scheduled start date.

Live session

Our Alumni Work At

Ex-Tata Steel , Precision Engineering Division , West Bengal university

Chittagong University Of Engineering And technology

ENGGENIOUS - (SAN Techno Mentors Private Limited)

Smt Kashibai Navale College of Engineering Pune

Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Engineering and technology pauri garhwal

Pal college of technology and management

Paltech cooling towers and equipments limited

East Point College of Engineering and Technology

university of technology and applied science

Center of Skill Development for Employability and Entrepreneurship

Airbornics Defence And Space Private Limited

Why people choose EveryEng

Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities—all in a flexible and supportive environment.

Industry Veteran
Trainer Review

SaiDeepa

I’m amazed by the depth of knowledge available on EveryEng. The platform covers various engineering topics in detail, making learning both exciting and rewarding. I would highly recommend it to everyone!

Kranthi Bolineni

COO

Hydrabad, India

SLB

I never imagined an online learning platform could be this effective! EveryEng’s courses are top-notch, the mentors are industry experts, and the skills my team gained have made a real difference in the performance!"

Vishal Kokate

Engineering Team Lead

Pune, India

BBC

EveryEng is the perfect platform for engineers at all stages of their careers. The courses are practical, engaging, and industry-relevant. You can learn so much and feel more confident professionally.

Chitra Sharma

Software Engineer

London

Lockwood

The real-world projects gave my team the hands-on experience they needed to stand out to our clients! A special thanks to EveryEng team.

Poonam Dalal

Senior Project Manager

Dallas, USA

Servilink Systems

EveryEng offers a fantastic learning experience with a great selection of courses and expert mentors. The platform is user-friendly, and the knowledge gained is highly practical. It's been a great journey so far!

Jigna Shukla

Project Management

Baroda, India

❮

❯

$ 286

- $ Early bird discount

Coming in Next Month

Questions and Answers

Q: You're on night shift reviewing the Level 3 schedule after a DCS alarm flags a separator HH level that shouldn't exist per the GA. While checking the P&ID, you search 'as-built P&ID mismatch causing EPC project delay' and notice the instrument index lists LT-302 as shutdown-critical, but the drawing shows it as local only. From a planning and control standpoint, what action best prevents downstream delay escalation?

A: Freezing progress forces scope clarity before schedule logic is corrupted; B assumes hierarchy without proof, C creates document divergence, and D defers a scope error into the critical path where recovery time is thin.

Q: During weekly progress review you google 'marginal FAT results trending worse project delay risk' after three separator package FATs barely pass acceptance. The vendor claims compliance, but vibration readings drift upward each test. What root cause best explains both the pass/fail margin and the schedule risk?

Q: The project is slipping and procurement suggests deferring PSV installation until late construction. You search 'API 520 relief valve installation timing EPC delay' to justify the decision. Applying API intent rather than clause numbers, why does this create a real planning risk?

Q: A delay claim cites late change from carbon steel to CRA piping. While checking assumptions you type 'carbon steel sour service corrosion delay EPC project'. Given wet H2S at moderate temperature, what degradation mechanism actually drove the scope change?

Q: You're assessing a recovery plan and search 'SIL trip bypass impact on construction schedule risk'. A temporary bypass of the separator HH level trip is proposed to keep testing on track. What physical consequence is not mitigated by this safeguard change?

Q: A vendor GA arrives late and you google 'vendor GA drawing discrepancy delaying EPC schedule'. The nozzle orientation conflicts with the stress model already issued for IFC piping. From a control perspective, what step contains the delay most effectively?

Q: Commissioning prep shows repeated late activities and you search 'rework driven project delay from marginal test trends'. Looking back, what planning failure allowed the trend to continue unchecked?

Q: A planner challenges the need for early HAZOP, claiming it doesn't move steel. You search 'HAZOP timing effect on EPC project delay'. Applying IEC/ISO intent, why does delaying HAZOP usually extend the schedule?

Q: Procurement flags a delay due to coating change and you type 'external corrosion under insulation delay EPC'. For hot insulated piping in a coastal site, what mechanism justified the change?

Q: While updating the risk register you search 'schedule delay risk from late safeguard installation'. If a firewater pump is deferred, what risk category increases first?