<link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Caveat:wght@500;700&family=JetBrains+Mono:wght@400;500;600&family=Source+Serif+4:ital,opsz,wght@0,8..60,600;0,8..60,700;1,8..60,700&display=swap" rel="stylesheet" /> Skip to main contentEngineering Courses, Mentoring & Jobs | EveryEng
Physical Metallurgy - Learn about Point and Line Defects banner

Physical Metallurgy - Learn about Point and Line Defects

Physical Metallurgy - Learn about Point and Line Defects banner
Live online Beginner

Physical Metallurgy - Learn about Point and Line Defects

4(24)
2296 views
COMPLETED

Tell us and we’ll notify you when the next batch is scheduled.

2 hrs
-
English
2296 views
Jay Desai
Jay Desai
  • 7-day money-back guarantee
  • Session recordings included
  • Certificate of completion

Why enroll

• Understand various routes by which point defects are introduced.

• Explore the cause and usefulness of line defects.

• Differentiate between vacancy, substitutional defect, and interstitial defect.

• Differentiate between edge, screw, and mixed dislocations.

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

  • You work in Manufacturing & Industrial
  • You're a Metallurgy & Material Science professional
  • You prefer live, instructor-led training with Q&A

You should skip if

  • You need a different specialisation outside Metallurgy & Material Science
  • You need fully self-paced, on-demand content

Course details

Course suitable for

Key topics covered

Vacancies, Interstitial Defects, Substitutional Defects, Edge Dislocations, Screw Dislocations, Mixed Dislocations

Opportunities that await you!

Career opportunities

Training details

This is a live course that has a scheduled start date.

Why people choose EveryEng

Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities-all in a flexible and supportive environment.

What learners say about this course

Bagavathi R
Bagavathi R Manager
May 3, 2026

Gave me cleaner language for design reviews and spec debates, which cuts down back-and-forth. The Ashby charts chapter stuck, especially the E/ρ comparison where you justify aluminum vs steel for an automotive bracket. I’ve already used that framing in PR comments and arch notes, though I wasn’t sold on how lightly polymers and creep were handled. Mostly practical, maps to prod tradeoffs, and I’m leaving with a firmer grip on picking materials under constraints rather than vibes.

Rahul S
Rahul S Mechanical Engineer
May 3, 2026

For anyone doing active development, the material lines up with the kind of tradeoffs you hit in prod and arch reviews. The Fe-C phase diagram walk-through in Chapter 3, especially sketching the eutectoid point and tying cooling rate to microstructure, stuck; it felt like reading a repo history rather than slides. Pace was mostly fine, though I wasn't sold on the polymers section and wished there was more on fatigue and failure analysis. labs like the tensile test and stress-strain plotting acted like CI and obs feedback loops—breaking samples beats another PR comment.

Anuj Jagadale
Anuj Jagadale Student
May 3, 2026

Early on, the course nudged my mental model and forced me to re-check the framework I’d been using. The moment in Chapter 4 on phase diagrams, walking a tie-line through the eutectic example and then flipping to Gibbs phase rule, stuck. I've already mapped the defect-energy tradeoffs to an arch decision in a repo PR, thinking like infra obs rather than equations; it's helped when reasoning about failure rates, not RPS. mostly worked, though I wasn't sold on how briefly diffusion kinetics were handled; still, don't feel as hand-wavy now about where abstractions leak.

AVNISH MISHRA
AVNISH MISHRA Research Scholar
May 3, 2026

The phase diagrams chapter stuck, especially the Pb–Sn lever rule worked example where you track fractions across the eutectic. It's mostly helpful for sanity-checking materials notes in PRs, though I wasn't sold on the thin treatment of fatigue testing and wished there was more on real ASTM specs.

COMPLETED

-

Questions and Answers

A: Governing principle: Vacancy concentration increases exponentially with temperature and affects dislocation mobility. At 450°C, ferritic steel accumulates thermal vacancies that assist dislocation climb, reducing yield strength without changing phase. Engineers often pick D because quenched-in vacancies sound familiar, but no rapid cooling occurred here.

A: Governing principle: High-temperature creep is controlled by vacancy diffusion enabling dislocation climb. Edge dislocations require climb to bypass obstacles, so their mobility sets the creep rate in this regime. Option B traps engineers who remember cross-slip but forget it’s less rate-controlling at high homologous temperature.

A: Governing principle: Vacancy fraction equals exp(-Qv / kT). Substituting values gives exp(-0.67 / (8.617e-5 × 500)) ≈ 1.8 × 10^-7. Option B catches those who drop the exponential and linearize the relation.

A: Governing principle: Grain boundaries impede dislocation motion and raise strength. ASTM limits grain size to control dislocation pile-up length and therefore mechanical response. Option B tempts those who blur point defects with microstructural scale effects.