Why enroll

People enroll in this course to gain practical knowledge in structural design using ETABS, a leading software in the industry. It equips students and professionals with the skills to model, analyze, and design RCC buildings in compliance with IS codes, which are essential for real-world engineering projects. By mastering these tools and standards, learners enhance their job readiness, improve their technical proficiency, and open up better career opportunities in structural engineering and construction.

Your instructor

Gaurav Gupta

1Courses

4Avg trainers rating

Course details

The structural design of a G+3 reinforced cement concrete (RCC) building involves the comprehensive analysis and detailing of all structural components—such as beams, columns, slabs, and foundations—to ensure safety, stability, and serviceability under various loading conditions. Using ETABS, a widely used structural analysis and design software, the entire modeling and analysis process is streamlined and efficient. The building is designed in strict compliance with Indian Standard (IS) codes, including IS 456:2000 for general RCC design, IS 875 for loading considerations, and IS 1893 for seismic analysis, among others. ETABS allows for accurate simulation of real-world forces such as dead load, live load, wind, and seismic forces, ensuring the structure meets all performance and safety requirements. The use of IS codes ensures the design aligns with national guidelines, promoting structural integrity, durability, and compliance with regulatory standards.

Course suitable for

Is this course for you?

Perfect for

You work in Infrastructure & Construction
You're a Civil & Structural / CAD & Analysis professional
You have 3+ years of hands-on experience in this field
You prefer self-paced learning you can revisit

Before you enrol

Advanced level — assumes working knowledge of Civil & Structural
Familiarity with ETABS
Self-paced video, 9 min — watch anytime

New to Civil & Structural? Browse beginner courses →

Ready for the next step?

Paid courses that build on what this one teaches.

Course curriculum

The course is readily available, allowing learners to start and complete it at their own pace.

2 lectures9 min

Introduction
5 min
Overview of Course Section
4 min

Opportunities that await you!

Skills & tools you'll gain

ETABS

Career opportunities

✎ Where this fits — what comes before, what comes next

Frequently asked questions

Q: You're sizing preliminary column loads and quickly check a model. Using the long-tail phrase "ETABS G+3 RCC column axial load calculation as per IS 456", what axial load should you apply at the base of an interior column if each floor contributes 350 kN dead load and 200 kN live load, with load combination 1.5(DL+LL) for four storeys including roof?

A: Governing principle: Ultimate limit state axial load uses factored combinations per IS 456. Applied here: (350+200) kN per floor × 4 floors × 1.5 gives 3,300 kN at column base. Distractor D traps engineers who drop the roof level without checking whether roof live load is specified as zero in the loading schedule.

Q: During review you notice a mismatch. The GA drawing shows slab thickness 150 mm, while the ETABS model summary lists 125 mm. Searching "ETABS slab thickness mismatch GA drawing IS 456" leads you here. What’s the safest action before design sign-off?

A: Governing principle: Design inputs must be consistent across controlling documents. Applied here: Slab thickness drives dead load, stiffness, and seismic mass, so reconciliation is mandatory before acceptance. Distractor B catches engineers who treat software output as authoritative without configuration control.

Q: Post-analysis, several ground-floor columns show unusually high moments despite symmetric geometry. While googling "ETABS torsional irregularity due to mass offset IS 1893", what root cause best fits this symptom?

A: Governing principle: Seismic analysis is sensitive to mass and stiffness distribution per IS 1893. Applied here: A shifted mass centroid induces torsion even in symmetric frames, inflating column moments. Distractor C appeals to those mixing gravity load logic into dynamic analysis where it doesn’t apply.

Q: For a quick sanity check, you estimate slab self-weight. Using "RCC slab self weight estimation IS 456 ETABS", what is the approximate dead load of a 150 mm thick RCC slab per square metre?

A: Governing principle: Dead load equals material density times thickness. Applied here: 0.15 m × 25 kN/m³ gives 3.75 kN/m² before finishes. Distractor C traps those who silently add finishes without checking the loading definition.