Skip to main contentEngineering Courses, Mentoring & Jobs | EveryEng
A Full Overview of ASME B31.3 - Fundamentals & Application banner

A Full Overview of ASME B31.3 - Fundamentals & Application

A Full Overview of ASME B31.3 - Fundamentals & Application banner
Live online English

A Full Overview of ASME B31.3 - Fundamentals & Application

4(84)
19 enrolled
6137 views
COMPLETED

Tell us and we’ll notify you when the next batch is scheduled.

4 hrs
-
English
6137 views
Anindya Bhattacharya
Anindya BhattacharyaAsset Engineer
  • 7-day money-back guarantee
  • Session recordings included
  • Certificate of completion

Why enroll

The participants will get

1. a theoretical background behind B31.3 requirements which helps a piping engineer understand the strengths, weaknesses, and applicability of the code requirements.

2. an understanding of how a Pipe stress Program operates.

3. an insight into the newly introduced B31J.

4. an understanding of how to develop a piping material specification on the basis of B31.3

5. an understanding of the technically challenging chapter on High-pressure piping.

6. the idea of bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge and code requirements.

What enrolled engineers say

6 verified reviews
  • May 3, 2026

    Good walk-through of B31.3 without fluff; the Appendix D flexibility calc where he steps through SIFs and thermal expansion numbers stuck, especially the hand-check vs CAESAR II note. Mostly practical for client work, though I wasn't sold on the pass over 302.3.5 allowable stresses—wished there was one more worked example tied to plant mods.

    Siddharth K. · engineer Verified
  • May 3, 2026

    The modular chunks fit between meetings, so I could dip in without blocking a half-day. The walk-through of para 302.3 using Table A-1 allowable stresses, then the branch reinforcement calc in Chapter II, stuck. it's framed like a PR review: assumptions, checks, failure modes, and how they'd change decisions in prod or infra. I wasn't sold on the light treatment of flexibility analysis and test choices in 345, but I've got a cleaner checklist for the next spec review.

    Deveshkumar C. Verified
  • May 3, 2026

    This course poked at assumptions I had about the ASME B31.3 framework—forcing me to reconcile the spec with how we actually run infra. The worked example in Section 302.3 on allowable stress with temperature derating stuck; walking the numbers felt like reviewing a prod change before merge. The 341/345 testing flow maps cleanly to CI gates and obs checks, though I wasn't sold on how lightly change churn (think k8s rollouts) was treated. I've caught myself reading other engineers’ calcs like PRs in a repo, annotating assumptions instead of skimming.

    Virendra K. Verified

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

  • You work in Oil & Gas Upstream or Pharmaceutical & Healthcare
  • You're a Piping & Layout Engineering / Mechanical Engineering professional
  • You prefer live, instructor-led training with Q&A

You should skip if

  • You need a different specialisation outside Piping & Layout Engineering
  • You need fully self-paced, on-demand content

Course details

The online instructor-led course on A Full Overview of ASME B31.3 - Fundamentals & Application is designed to provide participants with a deep understanding of certain parts of the ASME B31.3 Code, which governs the design, materials, construction, and testing of piping systems in the chemical, petroleum, and process industries. This course will help participants comprehend the core principles of ASME B31.3 and apply them effectively in the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of process piping systems. By the end of the course, participants will be able to interpret the described ASME B31.3 requirements confidently and apply them to ensure the safety, reliability, and compliance of piping systems in their respective industries.

The course is aimed at equipping engineers involved in stress analysis of piping and pressure vessel systems with the necessary theoretical minimum required to understand the applications of solid mechanics in piping and pressure vessel codes and standards. The following professionals will benefit from the course:

  • Piping Engineers (Stress and Layout)

  • University students who want to take up a career in piping engineering and want to learn about the most widely used Industrial standard on process piping.

  • Experienced Piping engineers who want to understand the background of code rules and requirements of B31.3

  • Piping department managers.

  • Anyone who is interested in piping engineering in the light of ASME B31.3

  • Mechanical Engineers

  • Fabrication and Construction Engineers who want to learn ASME B31.3 jargon

  • Quality Assurance and Inspection Personnel

  • Project Managers in the chemical, petrochemical, and process industries

The course will be conducted via online MS-Teams on 18th January and 25th January 2025; Two hours on each Saturday (1:30 PM IST to 3:30 PM IST)

Course suitable for

Key topics covered

1. Structure and organization of B31.3.

2. Design – Fundamentals of pressure design, Flexibility calculations, Stress intensification and Flexibility factors, background to allowable stress, what is B31J, understanding how pipe stress program operates, example problems.

3. Materials – Impact testing requirements; Theoretical background. Pre and Post weld heat treatment requirements and their theoretical background.

4. Testing – Hydrostatic and Pneumatic testings, Technical background behind the testing requirements.

5. High Pressure piping- Theoretical background of code requirements. Example problems.

Opportunities that await you!

Career opportunities

Training details

This is a live course that has a scheduled start date.

Live session

Starts

Sat, Jan 18, 2025

8:00 AM UTC· your timezone

Duration

2 hours per day

2 days total

Why people choose EveryEng

Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities-all in a flexible and supportive environment.

What learners say about this course

Avatar icon
Dinakar BR
May 3, 2026

Module 4 dragged a bit, and the labs assume you’ve already got a Caesar II license and units set up, which wasn’t spelled out. That said, the content mirrored issues we’re seeing in our current sprint on piping arch and infra. The anchor motion example in Chapter 6 stuck, especially how it walked through SSE vs OBE and why the load cases split the way they do. I’ve dealt with similar checks in oilgas work, but the modal combination section (CQC vs SRSS) finally lined up with how I see results in prod reviews. It’s not fluff; it ties back to decisions you’d make before opening a PR on calc changes. Helped clear out a lot of technical clutter I’d been carrying around.

Ravi M
Ravi M Piping engineer
May 3, 2026

Feels built by someone who's had to defend Caesar II runs in prod reviews, not just teach theory. The Response Spectrum section where he tunes damping to 2% vs 5% and fixes the modal participation table stuck; that's exactly the kind of cleanup I've done before sign-off on oilgas jobs. Some pacing was uneven and I wasn't sold on the quick skip past nozzle flexibility, wished there was more on that. Rare to see course material map this closely to day-to-day prod work.

Akula Kumar
Akula Kumar
May 3, 2026

Material here goes beyond what the vendor manuals spell out, and that’s useful when you’re already running Caesar II in prod and things don’t add up. The advanced focus shows, especially in the section on modal combination where the instructor walks through CQC vs SRSS and then tweaks damping to show why the stress jump wasn’t a solver bug. That moment in Chapter 3, flipping the support from rigid to bilinear and watching RPS redistribute, stuck with me. It reads like an engineer reviewing a PR, not marketing copy, and the arch-level framing maps well to oilgas piping where infra constraints dominate. I wasn't sold on the brief detour into time history setup; wished there was more on obs when results drift between runs. still, my turnaround on ugly vibration cases is faster now, mostly because I’m checking the right knobs earlier.

m.sheraz malik
m.sheraz malik
May 3, 2026

The course lays a workable path through a messy subject without hand-waving. The moment that stuck was the API-579 Part 9 Level 2 FAD walk-through using the circumferential crack in a girth weld, especially how K_I and reference stress were pulled from the tables. As a grad entrant, it helped connect theory to prod decisions in oilgas; it's like seeing the arch behind an approval PR, not just equations. wasn't sold on the short J-integral aside, and I've wished for more on fatigue crack growth rates, but it closed gaps I didn't know I had.

COMPLETED

-

Questions and Answers

A: A: Contract law first. Codes don't self-adopt. Without a signed change, you're locked to the cited edition. B: That's a common HSE assumption and it's wrong unless jurisdiction mandates it. C: Mechanical completion has zero standing in code applicability. D: Client specs only override if the contract says they do; inspectors check signatures, not intent.

A: A: That's how B31.3 frames it—t_req plus CA, then round up. B: MAWP is an outcome, not a knob you turn. C: Percentage CA drifts fast with diameter and isn't what the code says. D: That shifts design risk into operations and won't survive audit.

A: A: B31.3 flags cyclic service as a stress range problem; material stays valid with checks. B: Stainless still fatigues; it just fails prettier. C: Allowables don't address cycle count or S-N behavior. D: Geometry helps, but material fatigue limits still apply.

A: A: Scope is service-based, not tubing vs pipe. B: B31.1 is power piping, wrong domain. C: Diameter alone doesn't carve scope. D: Connection point doesn't change the code boundary.