Name: ASME B31.3 Piping Code: Fundamentals & Application
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.0 (84 reviews)

Self-paced Advanced

ASME B31.3 Piping Code: Fundamentals & Application

4(84)

29 enrolled

3698 views

₹ 9500

467 min

Anytime

English

3698 views

Anindya BhattacharyaAsset Engineer

Oil & Gas Downstream

Manufacturing & Industrial

7-day money-back guarantee
Lifetime access
Certificate of completion

Why enroll

The participants will get
1. a theoretical background behind B31.3 requirements which helps a piping engineer understand the strengths, weaknesses, and applicability of the code requirements.
2. an understanding of how a Pipe stress Program operates.
3. an insight into the newly introduced B31J.
4. an understanding of how to develop a piping material specification on the basis of B31.3
5. an understanding of the technically challenging chapter on High-pressure piping.
6. the idea of bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge and code requirements.

Some of the key points that participants will understand are:
1. Structure and organization of B31.3.
2. Design – Fundamentals of pressure design, Flexibility calculations, Stress intensification and Flexibility factors, background to allowable stress, what is B31J, understanding how pipe stress program operates, example problems.
3. Materials – Impact testing requirements; Theoretical background. Pre and Post weld heat treatment requirements and their theoretical background.
4. Testing – Hydrostatic and Pneumatic testings, Technical background behind the testing requirements.
5. High Pressure piping- Theoretical background of code requirements.

Your instructor

Anindya Bhattacharya

Asset Engineer

26+ yrs experience·United Kingdom

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

You work in Oil & Gas Downstream or Manufacturing & Industrial
You're a Piping & Layout Engineering / Mechanical Engineering professional
You have 3+ years of hands-on experience in this field
You prefer self-paced learning you can revisit

You should skip if

You're new to this field with no prior experience
You need a different specialisation outside Piping & Layout Engineering
You need live interaction with an instructor

Course details

The online instructor-led course on A Full Overview of ASME B31.3 - Fundamentals & Application is designed to provide participants with a deep understanding of certain parts of the ASME B31.3 Code, which governs the design, materials, construction, and testing of piping systems in the chemical, petroleum, and process industries. This course will help participants comprehend the core principles of ASME B31.3 and apply them effectively in the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of process piping systems. By the end of the course, participants will be able to interpret the described ASME B31.3 requirements confidently and apply them to ensure the safety, reliability, and compliance of piping systems in their respective industries.

The course is aimed at equipping engineers involved in stress analysis of piping and pressure vessel systems with the necessary theoretical minimum required to understand the applications of solid mechanics in piping and pressure vessel codes and standards. The following professionals will benefit from the course:

Piping Engineers (Stress and Layout)
University students who want to take up a career in piping engineering and want to learn about the most widely used Industrial standard on process piping.
Experienced Piping engineers who want to understand the background of code rules and requirements of B31.3
Piping department managers.
Anyone who is interested in piping engineering in the light of ASME B31.3
Mechanical Engineers
Fabrication and Construction Engineers who want to learn ASME B31.3 jargon
Quality Assurance and Inspection Personnel
Project Managers in the chemical, petrochemical, and process industries

Course suitable for

Key topics covered

1. Structure and organization of B31.3.

2. Design – Fundamentals of pressure design, Flexibility calculations, Stress intensification and Flexibility factors, background to allowable stress, what is B31J, understanding how pipe stress program operates, example problems. .

3. Materials – Impact testing requirements; Theoretical background. Pre and Post weld heat treatment requirements and their theoretical background.

4. Testing – Hydrostatic and Pneumatic testings, Technical background behind the testing requirements.

5. High Pressure piping- Theoretical background of code requirements. Example problems.

Course content

The course is readily available, allowing learners to start and complete it at their own pace.

2 lectures7 hr 47 min

ASME B31.3-Chapter II Design
217 min
Chapter III, V & VI
250 min

Opportunities that await you!

Career opportunities

✎ Where this fits — what comes before, what comes next

Why people choose EveryEng

Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities-all in a flexible and supportive environment.

What learners say about this course

Sayed Mohammed Afaq Lead Design Engineer

May 3, 2026

mostly clear walkthrough of the Section 6 response spectrum combo, especially the API 610 pump nozzle case in Caesar II—it tied modal participation factors to actual code checks. Wasn't sold on the time-history pacing; wished for more on damping assumptions, but it's helped me sanity-check dynamic loads before prod sign-off.

sarath Selvaraj Offshore Construction Engineer

May 3, 2026

The jump from junior intuition to senior judgment gets spelled out here, in a way that’s hard to miss. The API‑579 Part 9 walkthrough, especially the Level 2 FAD example for a through‑wall crack in an elbow, stuck with me because the numbers and assumptions were explicit. As a grad entrant, I've been mapping it to oilgas piping work; it frames arch tradeoffs like a PR review before pushing to prod. Mostly great, though I wasn't sold on the brief treatment of residual stress, and a bit more on inspection uncertainty would’ve helped, but the path forward is easy to see.

Mohammed Afaq Engineer

May 3, 2026

The API‑579 Level 2 FAD walkthrough in the piping module, especially the crack‑like flaw calc with membrane+bending stress, stuck and cleared gaps fast. It's mostly tight for advanced folks, but I wasn't sold on the brief cyclic crack growth—wished Annex 9 had one more example.

Anil Thombare Engineering management

May 3, 2026

Went in mainly thinking about how fracture assumptions translate to runtime limits in prod—less theory, more constraints. The walk-through of API-579 Part 9 FAD with the through-wall crack in a 12‑in elbow, including how they bounded RPS vs K, stuck. Helpful for arch conversations with infra and obs when incidents touch oilgas piping; maps to risk decisions. I wasn't sold on the brief treatment of CI-like inspection intervals; wished more on k8s-like ops cadence analogies, but I'd usually keep this to myself and won't.

₹9500

Access anytime

Questions and Answers

Q: You're reviewing a late-stage stress package and searching "ASME B31.3 flexibility analysis required for small bore piping". The subcontractor excluded a formal flexibility analysis for a 2-inch NPS carbon steel line operating at 180°C, connected between a fired heater outlet and a vertical vessel nozzle with two unrestrained elbows. Under B31.3 intent, what actually drives whether this analysis is mandatory?

A: That's the most common mistake — treating size-based screening rules like code text. The code logic cares about displacement stress range versus allowable, because thermal expansion damage doesn't scale cleanly with NPS. Heater tie-ins and vessel nozzles are classic anchors, so skipping the stress check just because it's a 2-inch line misses the intent.

Q: During punch walk-down you're asked to sanity-check a wall thickness calc and you google "ASME B31.3 pipe thickness calculation example with corrosion allowance". For a 6-inch NPS, seamless A106 Gr.B line at 9.5 MPa design pressure, 220°C, allowable stress S = 138 MPa, joint efficiency E = 1.0, and corrosion allowance of 3 mm, what minimum required thickness drives the spec?

A: That's the most common mistake — mixing where corrosion allowance actually enters the math. B31.3 pressure design gives you a required pressure thickness first, then you add corrosion explicitly. Dropping it or burying it inside a thin-wall shortcut undercuts MAWP without looking wrong on paper.

Q: The client flagged a material note and you're searching "carbon steel corrosion mechanism wet sour gas piping B31.3". The service is 45°C wet gas with 800 ppmv H2S, no oxygen ingress expected, and intermittent flow. What degradation mechanism actually governs material selection here?

A: That's the most common mistake — jumping straight to CO2 corrosion because there's water. Wet H2S changes the failure mode entirely, pushing you toward hydrogen damage concerns even at modest temperatures. Missing that leads to the wrong material and the wrong NACE controls.

Q: You're cross-checking a GA and P&ID and type "B31.3 piping class break symbol meaning on P&ID". The P&ID shows a spec break at a battery limit, but the GA continues the same line number and rating into the unit. What risk does B31.3 try to control with this documentation rule?

A: That's the most common mistake — thinking spec breaks are drafting trivia. The code intent is to force a conscious check that pressure rating, material, and corrosion basis don't silently change at interfaces. Battery limits are where assumptions usually die.

ASME B31.3 Piping Code: Fundamentals & Application

ASME B31.3 Piping Code: Fundamentals & Application

Why enroll