HVAC Equipment Sizing & Selection
- 7-day money-back guarantee
- Lifetime access
- Certificate of completion
Why enroll
Your instructor
Sajjad Ansari
MEP Project Engineer & Professional Trainer
Is this course for you?
You should take this if
- You work in HVAC
- You're a Mechanical Engineering professional
- You have some foundational knowledge in the subject
- You prefer self-paced learning you can revisit
You should skip if
- You're looking for an introductory overview course
- You need a different specialisation outside Mechanical Engineering
- You need live interaction with an instructor
Course details
Course suitable for
Key topics covered
Course content
The course is readily available, allowing learners to start and complete it at their own pace.
- 1.1 Introduction to Air Handling Unit15 min
- 1.2 Components of Air Handling Unit15 min
- 1.3 AHU Sizing & Selection26 min
- 2.1 Introduction to FCU & it's Components17 min
- 2.2 FCU Sizing & Selection9 min
- 3.1 Introduction to Chillers & it's Components15 min
- 3.2 Chiller Sizing & Selection18 min
- 3.3 Chiller Sizing & Selection Example7 min
Opportunities that await you!
Career opportunities
Why people choose EveryEng
Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities-all in a flexible and supportive environment.
What learners say about this course
This course turned out to be more technical than I anticipated. Coming in with field experience on HVACR projects, the deeper dive into ventilation rates, ASHRAE 62.1 interpretation, and duct sizing methods filled a real gap for me. The sections tying airflow calculations to fan energy and energy utilities costs were especially relevant, since utility penalties and peak demand are constant concerns on our commercial jobs.One challenge was keeping up with the psychrometrics portion. But this course is really helpful alot.
This course doesn’t assume you need hand-holding, which I liked since I’m usually flipping between calc sheets and prod work. The chapter on looped systems stuck with me, especially the walk-through where he balances a three-node loop and checks the most remote head after adding equivalent length for fittings. That mirrors how I actually sanity-check sprinkler calcs before a PR, and it shaved time the next time I had to review a submittal for a mixed sprinkler/standpipe job. Wasn’t sold on the pacing in the standpipe section; I wished there was a bit more on combined demand cases and how folks reconcile hand calcs with software outputs. still, the friction loss examples felt grounded, not academic, and the hvacr crossover notes helped frame why certain assumptions keep showing up. I’ve been doing these calcs for a while, but it finally clicked why the numbers land where they do under the hood.
Few classes spell out the tradeoffs without sugarcoating; this one mostly does, which matters when the deliverable is a building that has to behave in prod. The pacing fit how I work as a freelancer: skim the arch, grab the infra implications, move on, no fluff. The moment that stuck was the alarm management section where they walk through deadband math for a chilled water loop and show why a 0.5°C choice explodes obs noise at scale; I’ve seen that exact mess at 2am. There’s practical stuff too, like the BACnet scheduling vs local controller clocks comparison and how it affects maintenance windows. wasn't sold on the brief PLC aside, and I wished there was more on commissioning checklists and energyutilities handoff, but that’s minor. I’ve already shared notes in our repo and flagged it as prereading before we lock the next BMS platform.
it felt closer to a mentorship than a canned class, with the instructor thinking out loud through decisions. The moment in Section 5 where he rebuilds a duct layout using annotative blocks and layer states, then fixes a plotting issue in Paper Space, stuck with me. As someone bridging legacy CAD habits to modern workflows, it mapped well to how we refactor arch and infra in prod—it's small PRs, fewer surprises, cleaner obs. Mostly great, though I wasn't sold on the brief load calc aside and wished for a bit more on coordination with energyutilities.