Introduction to Heat Exchangers
Introduction to Heat Exchangers
Tell us and we’ll notify you when the next batch is scheduled.
- Session recordings included
- Certificate of completion
- Foundational Learning
- Access to Study Materials
Why enroll
What enrolled engineers say
Module 4 dragged a bit, and the homework assumes you’re already fluent in Excel Solver. That aside, the selection logic is what pulled me in: the decision trees for choosing shell-and-tube vs plate in Chapter 2, especially the LMTD vs ε‑NTU fork with the fouling factor example at minute ~18. As someone who thinks in arch diagrams and failure modes, mapping thermal constraints the way we map infra tradeoffs clicked. The counterflow vs parallel-flow section tied pressure drop back to maintenance in a way I’ve actually seen in chemicalpharmaceutical plants. it wasn’t fluffy, and it didn’t pretend everyone’s starting from zero. I’ve already bookmarked the pinch-temperature walkthrough for quick reference between meetings.
Needed material that wouldn’t fall apart under a PR-level sanity check, and this mostly held. The LMTD vs ε-NTU section, especially the shell-and-tube example where fouling factors changed sizing, stuck with me and maps well to how I think about legacy arch versus modern constraints. It connects old plant math to how I reason about infra tradeoffs in prod, even if the plate exchanger coverage felt light. still, it trimmed a lot of mental tech debt I’d been carrying from chemicalpharmaceutical work.
Section 3's shell-and-tube LMTD worked example (120→80°C, 2-pass) stuck; the step where fouling factor bumps area made the math click, it's easy to map to a prod calc. Mostly helpful, but I wasn't sold on the brief NTU coverage—wished there was more obs on sizing tradeoffs for chemicalpharmaceutical service.
Is this course for you?
You should take this if
- You work in Pharmaceutical & Healthcare or Energy & Utilities
- You're a Chemical & Process / Mechanical Engineering professional
- You prefer live, instructor-led training with Q&A
You should skip if
- You need a different specialisation outside Chemical & Process
- You need fully self-paced, on-demand content
Course details
Course suitable for
Opportunities that await you!
Career opportunities
Certifications
Training details
This is a live course that has a scheduled start date.
Why people choose EveryEng
Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities-all in a flexible and supportive environment.
What learners say about this course
Great
The scenarios felt close to real shop-floor calls, not toy problems, which helped bridge classroom math to prod constraints. Chapter 3’s LMTD vs ε‑NTU walk-through, especially the fouling factor table for a shell‑and‑tube case, stuck with me; it’s the kind of calc I’ve already sanity-checked in a PR comment for a chemicalpharmaceutical design note. mostly worked for beginner/intermediate, though I wasn’t sold on how lightly startup transients were treated. Good enough that I’ve gone back twice to re-read those sections.
Minor gripe first: Module 4 on LMTD vs ε-NTU dragged, and the labs assume you’ve already got MATLAB wired, which slowed my team’s juniors. Past that, the course felt like it was mapped by someone who’s already hit the walls my team’s about to hit in prod. The section on shell-and-tube fouling, especially the example where RPS drops after six months due to scaling, stuck. Clear tie-back to ops, not just equations. I liked how it framed arch tradeoffs alongside maintenance cost, which matters when infra budgets are tight. Good crosswalk from classroom calc to PR reviews and CI checks. even the brief nod to failure modes—tube vibration vs thermal stress—changed how I review designs before sign-off.
Grabbed this to sharpen system design instincts around pump selection and ops across plant infra. The NPSH margin walkthrough in the cavitation chapter—especially the chemical plant cooling-loop example where the pump curve gets overlaid—stuck more than expected. As a TeamLead watching capex, I liked the tradeoffs on series vs parallel, though I wasn't sold on how briefly variable speed drives were handled for brownfield retrofits. It's helped tighten arch calls where the grey bits usually slow reviews and prod fixes.
Oct 2, 2026 
