<link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Caveat:wght@500;700&family=JetBrains+Mono:wght@400;500;600&family=Plus+Jakarta+Sans:wght@600;700;800&display=swap" rel="stylesheet" /> Skip to main contentEngineering Courses, Mentoring & Jobs | EveryEng
Mastering Production Planning and Control banner
Preview this course

Mastering Production Planning and Control

Mastering Production Planning and Control banner
Preview this course
Self-paced Beginner

Mastering Production Planning and Control

4(4)
1905 views
₹ 499
171 min
Anytime
English
1905 views
J Aatish Rao
J Aatish RaoMechanical Engineering Professional
  • 7-day money-back guarantee
  • Lifetime access
  • Certificate of completion
Volume pricing for groups of 5+

Why enroll

Participants join this course to gain practical insights into the industry even before starting as a GET or DET. It teaches essential tools like MRP, inventory control, and lot sizing, which help them perform confidently at work. The course also focuses on improving presentation and communication skills, which are important for sharing ideas and solutions in a professional environment. Additionally, it provides a trainee’s perspective on career growth, showing how one can progress from an entry-level position to becoming a production engineer.

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

  • You work in Manufacturing
  • You're a Mechanical Engineering / Production Engineering professional
  • You prefer self-paced learning you can revisit

You should skip if

  • You need a different specialisation outside Mechanical Engineering
  • You need live interaction with an instructor

Course details

Production planning and control (PPC) is a key part of manufacturing that ensures products are made efficiently and on time. Production planning focuses on deciding what to produce, when to produce it, and in what quantity, taking a long-term view to optimize the entire production process. Production control, on the other hand, monitors and manages the production process to achieve the best performance and meet targets. This course covers basic concepts like production and manufacturing processes, as well as advanced techniques such as lot sizing, EOQ method, order size calculation, break-even analysis, and assembly line balancing. It helps students and professionals learn how to manage inventory, plan production, and control operations effectively. The course is especially useful for students in mechanical engineering, industrial engineering, production technology, and management. It is also valuable for aspiring production managers who want to improve efficiency and decision-making in real-world industries. Overall, it provides practical knowledge to understand, plan, and control the entire production system.

Course suitable for

Key topics covered

  • The knowledge that is required for any GET (Graduate Engineer Trainee) prior to joining an enterprise.

  • MRP (Material Requirement Planning), Its classes, methodology,implementation, and utility.

  • Vital techniques as such EOQ, Break-even analysis, Lot sizing, Order size calculation etc.

  • Management skills to survive plant politics.

  • Production planning and control techniques of various industries.

  • Forecasting - Qualitative as well quantitative.

  • Japanese techniques as such Kanban, Mizosomashi etc.

Course content

The course is readily available, allowing learners to start and complete it at their own pace.

41 lectures2 hr 51 min
  1. Scope of this course
    3 min
  2. What is production?
    4 min
  3. A production system
    4 min
  4. Types of production systems
    9 min
  5. Types of manufacturing processes
    3 min
  6. Selection of a manufacturing process
    3 min
  7. PPC Meaning
    2 min
  8. Elements of PPC
    2 min
  9. Production planning
    5 min
  10. Production Control
    4 min
  11. Steps involved
    7 min
  12. Requirements for an effective PPC
    5 min
  13. Benefits of PPC procedure
    3 min
  14. Affecting factors
    5 min
  15. Estimating the stages of production planning
    4 min
  16. Forecasting methods
    2 min
  17. Qualitative Forecasting
    6 min
  18. Quantitative forecasting
    8 min
  19. Forecasting errors
    3 min
  20. Introduction to MRP
    2 min
  21. Concept of MRP
    4 min
  22. Classes of MRP users
    4 min
  23. MRP I/O
    2 min
  24. Product Demand and BOM
    3 min
  25. Product structure
    7 min
  26. MPS and IRF
    6 min
  27. Primary and secondary reports
    5 min
  28. Order size calculation
    4 min
  29. Lot for Lot method
    2 min
  30. Economic Order Quantity - EOQ
    5 min
  31. Least Total Cost method
    4 min
  32. Least Unit Cost method
    2 min
  33. JIT - Just In Time production
    5 min
  34. Kanban Visual system
    7 min
  35. Benefits of MRP
    3 min
  36. Break Even Analysis
    2 min
  37. Lot sizing rules
    3 min
  38. Assembly line balancing
    4 min
  39. Set A
    7 min
  40. Set B
    5 min
  41. Set C
    3 min

Opportunities that await you!

Career opportunities

₹499

Access anytime

Questions and Answers

A: Option A feels familiar because some shops hide downtime in efficiency, but takt is based on net available time. Leaving the 45 minutes in inflates capacity on paper only. Option C shows up when planners round for convenience, yet that rounding quietly builds backlog by mid‑shift. Option D borrows a labor balancing idea and mixes it into takt; headcount doesn't change customer demand timing. Subtracting the planned downtime gives 435 minutes, or 26,100 seconds, divided by 480 units.

A: Option A is tempting if you've lived by delta triangles, but clouds alone are often the change indicator once a revision is released. Option C sounds orderly, yet tables don't automatically override views unless the standard says so, and many don't. Option D is the safest reflex, though it kills throughput when the intent is already released. A cloud on Rev C signals a change captured in that revision even if the delta tag is missing.

A: Option A follows the instrument and risks chasing a ghost. Option C is attractive when numbers look better, yet yield gains show up in counts and weights, not just one transmitter. Option D feels conservative, but it bakes in lost throughput without evidence of a real surge. Conflicting data between the FT and physical counts points to measurement drift or density compensation before any planning move.

A: Option A is the classic hazard the curtain is meant to stop, so it feels wrong to pick anything else. Option C ties to control logic and restart interlocks, not optical sensing. Option D is partially reduced when the curtain is active. Flying debris from a die failure isn't sensed by beam interruption, so the curtain does nothing for that exposure.