Mastering Production Planning and Control | EveryEng

Skip to main content

Self-paced Beginner

Mastering Production Planning and Control

4(4)

1958 views

₹ 499

171 min

Anytime

English

1958 views

J Aatish RaoMechanical Engineering Professional

Manufacturing & Industrial

Production Engineering

7-day money-back guarantee
Lifetime access
Certificate of completion

Why enroll

Participants join this course to gain practical insights into the industry even before starting as a GET or DET. It teaches essential tools like MRP, inventory control, and lot sizing, which help them perform confidently at work. The course also focuses on improving presentation and communication skills, which are important for sharing ideas and solutions in a professional environment. Additionally, it provides a trainee’s perspective on career growth, showing how one can progress from an entry-level position to becoming a production engineer.

Your instructor

J Aatish Rao

Tutor

Mechanical Engineering Professional

11+ yrs experience·India

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

You work in Manufacturing & Industrial
You're a Production Engineering / Industrial Engineering professional
You prefer self-paced learning you can revisit

You should skip if

You need a different specialisation outside Production Engineering
You need live interaction with an instructor

Course details

Production planning and control (PPC) is a key part of manufacturing that ensures products are made efficiently and on time. Production planning focuses on deciding what to produce, when to produce it, and in what quantity, taking a long-term view to optimize the entire production process. Production control, on the other hand, monitors and manages the production process to achieve the best performance and meet targets. This course covers basic concepts like production and manufacturing processes, as well as advanced techniques such as lot sizing, EOQ method, order size calculation, break-even analysis, and assembly line balancing. It helps students and professionals learn how to manage inventory, plan production, and control operations effectively. The course is especially useful for students in mechanical engineering, industrial engineering, production technology, and management. It is also valuable for aspiring production managers who want to improve efficiency and decision-making in real-world industries. Overall, it provides practical knowledge to understand, plan, and control the entire production system.

Course suitable for

Key topics covered

The knowledge that is required for any GET (Graduate Engineer Trainee) prior to joining an enterprise.
MRP (Material Requirement Planning), Its classes, methodology,implementation, and utility.
Vital techniques as such EOQ, Break-even analysis, Lot sizing, Order size calculation etc.
Management skills to survive plant politics.
Production planning and control techniques of various industries.
Forecasting - Qualitative as well quantitative.
Japanese techniques as such Kanban, Mizosomashi etc.

Course content

The course is readily available, allowing learners to start and complete it at their own pace.

41 lectures2 hr 51 min

Scope of this course
3 min
What is production?
4 min
A production system
4 min
Types of production systems
9 min
Types of manufacturing processes
3 min
Selection of a manufacturing process
3 min
PPC Meaning
2 min
Elements of PPC
2 min
Production planning
5 min
Production Control
4 min
Steps involved
7 min
Requirements for an effective PPC
5 min
Benefits of PPC procedure
3 min
Affecting factors
5 min
Estimating the stages of production planning
4 min
Forecasting methods
2 min
Qualitative Forecasting
6 min
Quantitative forecasting
8 min
Forecasting errors
3 min
Introduction to MRP
2 min
Concept of MRP
4 min
Classes of MRP users
4 min
MRP I/O
2 min
Product Demand and BOM
3 min
Product structure
7 min
MPS and IRF
6 min
Primary and secondary reports
5 min
Order size calculation
4 min
Lot for Lot method
2 min
Economic Order Quantity - EOQ
5 min
Least Total Cost method
4 min
Least Unit Cost method
2 min
JIT - Just In Time production
5 min
Kanban Visual system
7 min
Benefits of MRP
3 min
Break Even Analysis
2 min
Lot sizing rules
3 min
Assembly line balancing
4 min
Set A
7 min
Set B
5 min
Set C
3 min

Opportunities that await you!

Career opportunities

Why people choose EveryEng

Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities-all in a flexible and supportive environment.

What learners say about this course

Yogendra Sagar Mishra

May 3, 2026

Needed material that would survive PR-level nitpicks, not just “it runs” demos, and this mostly did. The bit in Module 2 where spindle speed is derived for aluminum vs steel, then checked against the lathe chart, stuck. It connected old shop habits to modern infra thinking; tolerances, fixtures, and QC map to arch calls I’ve made around CI and prod obs. Wasn’t sold on the thin coverage of CNC offsets, wished for more on mfg safety analytics, but I moved past “it works” toward knowing why the cut behaves.

Chilakapati Sai Akhila junior trainee

May 3, 2026

The scaling angle pulled me in, even at a beginner level. Chapter 3’s jig vs fixture walkthrough, especially the drill-press tolerance stack-up with the dial indicator, stuck; it mapped cleanly to how small arch calls snowball in prod and CI. Some bits felt slow, and I wasn't sold on the long safety preface, though it's fine for mfg. I've caught myself reviewing PRs and repos with a sharper eye for repeatability and failure modes—less heroics, more process.

Pranav Gajula Student

May 3, 2026

The emphasis leaned toward sane modeling habits instead of shortcut hacks, which matters even at beginner level. The segment on sketch constraints during the hinge bracket example, especially when he rolled the timeline back to fix a dimension, stuck with me; that’s how things break in real CAD. I wasn't sold on the light treatment of assemblies and joints, and a quick nod to downstream CAM would've helped. It does a decent job showing why answers vary once tolerances, edits, and reuse enter the picture.

Mohamed Abdelrahman

May 3, 2026

Left with a cleaner mental map of the methods and when to use them. The Newton-Raphson stopping criteria in Chapter 3, especially the example where a bad initial guess oscillates, stuck and mapped well to real error behavior. It helped frame tolerances like guardrails in CI before pushing to prod; that's useful for PRs and arch discussions, even if the math's beginner. Mostly tight, though I wasn't sold on the brief Euler stability note; I've seen automotive models go sideways there and wished for one more worked case.

₹499

Access anytime

Questions and Answers

Q: You're setting a daily plan and searching "takt time calculation for mixed model assembly line". Customer demand is 480 units per 8‑hour shift. Planned downtime is 45 minutes per shift. What takt time should Production Control release to the line?

A: Option A feels familiar because some shops hide downtime in efficiency, but takt is based on net available time. Leaving the 45 minutes in inflates capacity on paper only. Option C shows up when planners round for convenience, yet that rounding quietly builds backlog by mid‑shift. Option D borrows a labor balancing idea and mixes it into takt; headcount doesn't change customer demand timing. Subtracting the planned downtime gives 435 minutes, or 26,100 seconds, divided by 480 units.

Q: You're reviewing a GA and googling "how to read revision clouds on manufacturing drawings". The title block shows Rev C. A clouded note calls out a hole size change with no delta triangle number. What should you assume on the shop floor?

A: Option A is tempting if you've lived by delta triangles, but clouds alone are often the change indicator once a revision is released. Option C sounds orderly, yet tables don't automatically override views unless the standard says so, and many don't. Option D is the safest reflex, though it kills throughput when the intent is already released. A cloud on Rev C signals a change captured in that revision even if the delta tag is missing.

Q: During rate ramp‑up you search "flow transmitter reading higher than mass balance". FT‑201 shows 12% higher flow than yesterday. Finished goods count and feeder weights haven't changed. What do you do first?

A: Option A follows the instrument and risks chasing a ghost. Option C is attractive when numbers look better, yet yield gains show up in counts and weights, not just one transmitter. Option D feels conservative, but it bakes in lost throughput without evidence of a real surge. Conflicting data between the FT and physical counts points to measurement drift or density compensation before any planning move.

Q: You're updating the risk register and search "what does a light curtain not protect against". A light curtain guards an automated press. The operator bypasses it with a reflective vest. What physical risk remains unmitigated?

A: Option A is the classic hazard the curtain is meant to stop, so it feels wrong to pick anything else. Option C ties to control logic and restart interlocks, not optical sensing. Option D is partially reduced when the curtain is active. Flying debris from a die failure isn't sensed by beam interruption, so the curtain does nothing for that exposure.