Skip to main contentEngineering Courses, Mentoring & Jobs | EveryEng
Petroleum Reservoir Engineering banner
Preview this course

Petroleum Reservoir Engineering

Petroleum Reservoir Engineering banner
Preview this course
Self-paced Beginner

Petroleum Reservoir Engineering

4(69)
43 enrolled
1983 views
FREE
1240 min
Anytime
English
1983 views
Team OG
Team OGUpstream Oil & Gas Technical Professional
  • Lifetime access
  • Certificate of completion
  • Foundational Learning
  • Access to Study Materials

Why enroll

The course helps learners grasp key concepts such as reservoir properties, fluid flow through porous media, material balance, reserve estimation, and production forecasting. It is especially valuable for petroleum engineers, energy professionals, and students who want to build expertise in upstream oil and gas operations. By learning real-world reservoir analysis techniques, participants can improve decision-making, enhance recovery efficiency, and boost career opportunities in the petroleum and energy industry.

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

  • You work in Oil & Gas Upstream
  • You're a Petroleum Technology / Geoscience professional
  • You prefer self-paced learning you can revisit

You should skip if

  • You need a different specialisation outside Petroleum Technology
  • You need live interaction with an instructor

Course details

Petroleum Reservoir Engineering is a specialized field of engineering that focuses on the evaluation, development, and management of oil and gas reservoirs to maximize hydrocarbon recovery. This course provides in-depth knowledge of reservoir properties such as porosity, permeability, and fluid saturation, along with fluid flow behavior in porous media. It covers essential topics like material balance analysis, reservoir drive mechanisms, well testing, reserve estimation, and production forecasting.


Develop a comprehensive understanding of petroleum reservoir engineering, focusing on principles, methodologies, and best practices for optimizing hydrocarbon recovery.

Source: NPTEL IIT Guwahati (YouTube Channel)

Dr. Pankaj Tiwari, Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati

Course suitable for

Key topics covered

- Understand reservoir rock and fluid properties

- Analyze well performance and reservoir behavior

- Apply reservoir simulation and modeling techniques

- Optimize reservoir development and management strategies

- Evaluate enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods

Course content

The course is readily available, allowing learners to start and complete it at their own pace.

22 lectures20 hr 40 min
  1. Petroleum Reservoir Engineering
    10 min
  2. Introduction to Petroleum Reservoir Engineering
    60 min
  3. Petroleum Reserves
    42 min
  4. Petroleum Geology
    52 min
  5. Well Drilling Methods
    42 min
  6. Thermodynamics of Hydrocarbons
    50 min
  7. Natural Gas Properties
    60 min
  8. Properties of Crude Oil
    64 min
  9. Reservoir Rock Properties
    68 min
  10. Relative Permeability
    62 min
  11. Primary Drive Mechanisms
    44 min
  12. General Material (Volumetric) Balance
    55 min
  13. Volumetric Balance in Oil and Gas Reservoir
    62 min
  14. Fundamentals of Reservoir Fluid Flow
    60 min
  15. General Equations for radial Flow in Reservoir
    50 min
  16. Inflow Performance Relationship for Reservoir Fluids
    71 min
  17. Well Testing and Performance-I
    85 min
  18. Well Testing and Performance-II
    53 min
  19. Secondary Oil Recovery Methods
    80 min
  20. Enhanced Oil Recovery Methods
    72 min
  21. Introduction to Reservoir Simulation
    56 min
  22. Unconventional Natural Gas Production
    42 min

Opportunities that await you!

Career opportunities

Why people choose EveryEng

Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities-all in a flexible and supportive environment.

What learners say about this course

Ali Taqi
Ali Taqi
Mar 15, 2026

it

sarath Selvaraj
sarath Selvaraj Offshore Construction Engineer
May 3, 2026

This course nudged how I think about legacy choices, kind of like refactoring old arch without breaking prod. It frames sand control as tradeoffs instead of rules, which clicked for me coming from software and infra, especially when you’re juggling constraints that look a lot like CI gates and RPS limits. The micro-detail that stuck was the screen sizing example in the “Gravel Pack vs Frac Pack” section, where they walk through median grain size and then show how one assumption cascades into cost and ops risk—felt like reading a PR where one default sneaks into prod. I wasn’t sold on every analogy to modern completions; the k8s-style modularity pitch was mostly helpful but a bit hand-wavy in spots. Still, the beginner pacing worked, and the oilgas context mapped cleanly to how we think about legacy systems in energyutilities. I’ve already got a note to tweak some of our internal logic after this, mostly around how we document assumptions before they fossilize in the repo.

Saurabh Kumar Gupta
Saurabh Kumar Gupta Content Manager
May 3, 2026

For a beginner course, the Chapter 3 pipeline sizing walk-through using the Weymouth equation stuck, the step where they sanity-check RPS vs linepack. As a TL in energyutilities, it's useful for onboarding—I've pointed juniors at it, but I wasn't sold on the coverage of ops/infra handoffs and wished there was more on safety before prod.

Bahast Mohammed
Bahast Mohammed Office Administrator
May 3, 2026

Scheduling-friendly modular chunks made it easy to fit between meetings without losing context. The beginner framing didn't dumb things down; it mapped the gas arch from wellhead to pipeline ops with enough math to reason about prod issues. Chapter 3's worked example on pressure drop comparing Panhandle A vs Weymouth stuck, especially the aside on when assumptions break at low Reynolds numbers. The metering section on standard vs actual cubic feet and temperature correction felt like reviewing a PR where unit consistency can quietly bite prod and infra. Mostly good pacing, though I wasn't sold on the quick skim of compressor controls; wished there was more on failure modes and obs in real stations. The careful handling of consistency tradeoffs across equations and field conventions is the part I keep referencing back to.

FREE

Access anytime

Questions and Answers

A: Option A tracks the combination that actually matters: dissolved CO2, liquid water, and elevated temperature pushing carbonic acid kinetics. B sounds tempting if you fixate on pressure alone, but with negligible H2S the SSC mechanism doesn’t initiate. C borrows a failure mode from surface systems; oxygen ingress isn’t credible in a sealed reservoir environment. D becomes dominant only when sand rates and velocities are high, which isn’t stated and wouldn’t replace electrochemical attack as the life-limiting mechanism here.

A: A follows the barrier logic: the valve’s job is isolation, not rate control, so its failure removes a layer against blowout. B confuses chemical damage with barrier failure; souring needs sulfate and biology, not an open valve. C sounds operationally plausible but jumps from failure mode to long‑term damage without a mechanism. D imports a multizone completion assumption that isn’t inherent to a single safety valve.

A: A comes from keeping units straight: area to m², bulk rock volume to pore volume, applying oil saturation, then dividing by FVF. B typically drops the saturation term or misuses porosity as a percentage. C looks reasonable if you forget to convert km² or double‑count net pay. D often appears when FVF is mistakenly multiplied instead of divided, shrinking the stock tank volume.

A: A reflects how low‑ppm H2S is managed: control hardness and stress rather than jumping materials. B is attractive because 13Cr is common, but at this temperature and with H2S present it’s not automatically safer. C overreaches; CRAs are selected when severity justifies cost, not on trace gas alone. D imports a seawater narrative; chlorides aren’t the controlling variable downhole here.