Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Fundamentals and ASME Section VIII Division 2 Part 5 Implementation for Pressure Vessel Design
Anindya Bhattacharya
Asset Engineer
$ 250
5 already enrolled!
Advanced course for professionals
Anytime Learning
Learn from Industry Expert
Career Option Guideline
Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Fundamentals and ASME Section VIII Division 2 Part 5 Implementation for Pressure Vessel Design
Trainers feedback
4
(29 reviews)
Anindya Bhattacharya
Asset Engineer
Course type
Watch to learn anytime
Course duration
881 Min
Course start date & time
Access anytime
Language
English
This course format through pre-recorded video. You can buy and watch it to learn at any time.
Course content
The course is readily available, allowing learners to start and complete it at their own pace.
Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Fundamentals and ASME Section VIII Division 2 Part 5 Implementation for Pressure Vessel Design
12 Lectures
881 min
Introduction
Preview
14 min
Displacement based on FEA
76 min
Weight Residual Method - FEA
82 min
Displacement Based FEA - Why it is
98 min
Shape Function
82 min
Theory of plates - Kirchoff's
77 min
Flexibility Factor
62 min
Primary, secondary and peak stress defination
45 min
Hopper Diagram
65 min
All abouts stress
81 min
LRFD Factor for Elastic Plastic Analysis
95 min
Fatigue Analysis
104 min
Course details
Course suitable for
Oil & Gas Energy & Utilities Piping & Layout Mechanical Onshore Pipeline
Key topics covered
What is Finite element analysis? Difference between analytical, finite element , finite difference and boundary element methods.
The two approaches- Galerkin and Principle of minimum potential energy. How governing equations are developed for FEA?
Displacement based approaches and other approaches of finite element analysis for structural mechanics.
Element formulation- linear and higher order displacement functions.
Different element types including their higher order versions- beam elements, triangular, quadrilateral, 3D elements, plate and shell elements,
How to choose elements for an application?
Mesh generation, mesh grading, element distortions, their allowable limits. Their effect on analysis results.
Solutions of FE equations. Integration orders, reduced and full integration. Their effects. Brief overview of shear and membrane locking., rigid body modes, phantom modes, hourglass modes.
Averaging vs non-averaging, convergence check.
Post processing of FE results for piping and pressure vessel analysis.
A brief overview of FE analysis for thermal/heat transfer problems.
A brief overview of design by analysis rule of ASME SEC VIII D2 Part 5.
How FE theory is incorporated in ASME SEC VIII D2 Part 5.
Element of theory of plasticity, its incorporation in ASME SEC VIII D2 Part 5 and its FE implementation. Brief overview of Riks algorithm.
FE analysis of bucking/elastic/elastic-plastic instability problems and its implementation in the framework of ASME SEC VIII D2 Part 5.
So, basically, This course will have
1. In depth ( won't compare it with one or two semester university courses as that cannot be encapsulated in courses like these ) theoretical coverage of the two key approaches to FEM- Galerkin and Principle of minimim potential energy . It will cover basics of element formulations for linear and quadratic elements , in 1D, 2D and 3D spaces.
2. This course will cover different element types, their strengths and weaknesses and areas of application.
3. A high level overview of meshing and mesh grading .
4. Numerical integration like Gauss.
5. Full vs reduced integration.
6. Concepts of convergence, completeness of polynomials, h and p refinement.
7. Application of FEM in piping applications as per B31.3.
8. Application of FEM in pressure vessel code like sec viii d2 part 5.
9. Regarding point 8 I would recommend any interested candidate for this course to kindly review my free course on solid mechanics as I will cover plate n shell theory and non linear mechanics including plasticity in context of Application of sec viii d2. .
10. There will be screenshots from abaqus but no live demonstrations.
11. This course like my other courses will be maths heavy in the theoretical section .
12. This course will not be simple " how to do type" but why to do followed by how to do.
13. This course cannot teach you about operating a specific software. Key points from Abaqus will be there .
14. This course will give you an understanding of the theoretical minimum and to see their application in the space of piping and pressure vessels. Some key learning outcomes will be understanding of background theory to confidently do FEA and critically review and challenge any FEA report.
15. Currently I have not included any thermal analysis in the slides. If potential candidates want I can add the same .
Our Alumni Work At
Why people choose EveryEng
Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities—all in a flexible and supportive environment.
- Industry Veteran
- Trainer Review

Lamprell
EveryEng provides everything an aspiring engineer needs. The courses are relevant, engaging, and easy to follow. It's the best investment an engineer can make in his/her career!

Parth Desai
Offshore Construction Manager
Dubai, UAE

SaiDeepa
I’m amazed by the depth of knowledge available on EveryEng. The platform covers various engineering topics in detail, making learning both exciting and rewarding. I would highly recommend it to everyone!

Kranthi Bolineni
COO
Hydrabad, India

Heelium
EveryEng is my go-to platform for engineering education. The courses are easy to follow, and the instructors are very knowledgeable. The platform has helped my team gain confidence and expertise in our field.

Siddharth Jain
Co-Founder
Pune, India

Technip
The content quality on EveryEng is outstanding! Every lesson is well-organized, and the instructors explain everything so clearly. This platform can help every engineer grow professionally in ways I never imagined.

Mulkita Sabharwal
Lead Engineer
Frankfrut, Germany

SaiDeepa
EveryEng has completely transformed the learning experience. The platform is easy to navigate, offers high-quality content, and provides great support. I highly recommend it to anyone looking to upskill in engineering.

Sunil Nukatti
CEO
Hydrabad, India
Anindya Bhattacharya
Asset Engineer
Questions and Answers
A: The correct choice achieves strain convergence in a high-gradient plastic zone without artificial stiffening. Option B under-resolves the curvature and weld toe so peak strain collapses numerically. Option C imports a shell-model mindset and misses through-thickness gradients that drive local ligament failure. Option D pushes cost and solver noise without improving Part 5 acceptance once material hardening is defined correctly.
A: The correct logic directly controls ductile damage where plasticity localizes. Option B is a Div 2 Part 4 habit and ignores plastic redistribution. Option C masks local yielding because stress has no acceptance meaning once plasticity forms. Option D addresses instability, not strain-controlled rupture at weld toes.
A: The correct result preserves force equilibrium as area shrinks during uniform plastic deformation. Option B drops the geometric correction that Part 5 material models need. Option C flips the relationship and under-predicts plastic work. Option D confuses hardening slope with a scaling factor.
A: The correct mechanism matches progressive strain accumulation without immediate cracking. Option B would show crack initiation before large ovalisation. Option C produces a sudden mode shape change, not cycle-by-cycle strain growth. Option D contradicts the elevated operating temperature profile.
A: The correct assumption captures strength degradation that drives higher plastic strain at temperature. Option B ignores creep-adjacent softening effects within the cycle. Option C suppresses strain hardening and distorts collapse load. Option D reverts to allowable stress logic that Part 5 rejects.
A: The correct setup avoids over-stiffening so collapse mechanisms can form. Option B suppresses bending and hides local yielding. Option C adds tuning freedom that biases results under time pressure. Option D drops a primary load path that governs stress redistribution.
A: The correct call differentiates material zones with different ductility allowances. Option B ignores mandatory weld reductions. Option C confuses elastic design with plastic assessment. Option D reintroduces a stress check that Part 5 disallows.
A: The correct cause explains a sudden mode shape change without strain history. Option B requires cycle-by-cycle accumulation. Option C needs many cycles and crack growth indicators. Option D contradicts the external pressure loading direction.
A: The correct estimate scales stress with pressure ratio under the same geometry. Option B mixes density with stress generation. Option C confuses design allowables with actual stress. Option D invents a fluid property effect that doesn't exist.
A: The correct approach accounts for cyclic plastic strain that dominates damage at low cycles. Option B misses strain-controlled fatigue. Option C invents a threshold that doesn't exist. Option D blends incompatible design philosophies.
More from Same Author
- Technical Courses
- Articles
No technical courses published yet - check back soon!
Earning and Growth option in same Industry Domain
- Pre-recorded
- Online live session
- Offline
- Articles
Currently there is no courses available!
Why choose EveryEng?
Flexible Learning
Continuous Improvement
Beat Competition
Cost Effective solutions
Are you interested in taking a course?
More Training & Development option to expand your reach
- Technical courses
- Soft-skills courses
- Seminars
- Articles & Blogs
4 (16)
1918
6
Online
Live courses
December 31
160 Hrs
Advanced
Online
Live courses
Interacting with trainer
4
156
Online
Live courses
February 21
25 Hrs
Advanced
Online
Live courses
Interacting with trainer
4 (16)
784
Online
Live courses
February 21
30 Hrs
Advanced
Online
Live courses
Interacting with trainer