Skip to main contentEngineering Courses, Mentoring & Jobs | EveryEng
Active Contol of vibrations & Noise and applications of AI/ML fo automotive NVH banner

Active Contol of vibrations & Noise and applications of AI/ML fo automotive NVH

Active Contol of vibrations & Noise and applications of AI/ML fo automotive NVH banner
Self-paced Beginner

Active Contol of vibrations & Noise and applications of AI/ML fo automotive NVH

4(115)
4 enrolled
558 views
FREE
35 min
Anytime
English
558 views
MILIND AMBARDEKAR
MILIND AMBARDEKARConsultant
  • Lifetime access
  • Certificate of completion
  • Foundational Learning
  • Access to Study Materials

Why enroll

People join this course to gain expertise in active control of vibrations and noise, and to learn how AI/ML can be applied to automotive NVH. By mastering these skills, professionals can design and develop quieter, more refined vehicles, enhancing the driving experience and staying competitive in the industry.

What enrolled engineers say

4 verified reviews
  • May 3, 2026

    Felt like sitting next to a senior engineer sketching control loops and tradeoffs, not a polished lecture. The bit that stuck was the ANC section where they walk through feedforward vs feedback using an LMS filter and a 120 Hz road-noise example, then map it to a simple Simulink block. It connects cleanly to day-to-day work: wiring data from the repo, sanity-checking arch choices, and thinking about what actually survives prod, even if the AI/ML piece stays light. mostly fine for beginner level, though I wasn't sold on the brief k8s/CI aside and wished there was more on vehicle-level validation before our upcoming controller swap.

    Bommuraj A. · NVH Verified
  • May 3, 2026

    Nice to see corner cases get airtime instead of being hand-waved. The Chapter 3 FxLMS adaptive feedforward ANC walkthrough using the road-noise dataset, with sensor delay misalignment called out, stuck. I've already mirrored the repo pattern in a small prod experiment; the arch diagrams map cleanly to what we ship. Wasn't sold on the AI section rushing past feature drift; wished there was more obs on model decay, but it still fit my professional dev time well.

    prajwal M. Verified
  • May 3, 2026

    While poking at obs gaps between prod NVH tests and what we log, I stumbled onto this beginner course and skimmed a few modules between meetings. The early framing around active control vs passive damping clicked fast, and the chapter where they walk through an LMS-based active noise control loop on a half-car model stuck, especially the plot showing coherence dropping after tuning. It helped map textbook control to things I actually touch, like wiring data from a test rig into a repo and sanity-checking assumptions before a PR hits CI. i wasn't sold on the AI/ML angle at first, but the short example using a simple regressor to predict cabin boom from road profiles was practical enough. I wished there was more on validation pitfalls in prod, or how this plays with k8s when models retrain off test data. Still, I got more out of this than the last couple conferences I sat through, fewer slides, more stuff I can try tomorrow.

    Prem K. · PCB Verified

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

  • You work in Automotive
  • You're a Noise & Vibration Engineering / Artificial Intelligence professional
  • You prefer self-paced learning you can revisit

You should skip if

  • You need a different specialisation outside Noise & Vibration Engineering
  • You need live interaction with an instructor

Course details

Active control of vibrations and noise in automotive NVH involves advanced technologies like Active Noise Cancellation (ANC) and adaptive control algorithms to minimize unwanted sounds and vibrations. AI and ML applications in NVH enable predictive analytics, simulation-driven design, and optimization of noise reduction solutions. By leveraging AI/ML, automotive manufacturers can improve sound quality, reduce noise levels, and increase efficiency in the design and testing process, resulting in quieter, more refined vehicles.

Course suitable for

Key topics covered

  • what are passive control ways of automotive NVH?

  • Active Control

  • Active Noise Cancellation

  • ANC Benefits mainly in low frequency bands

Course content

The course is readily available, allowing learners to start and complete it at their own pace.

1 lectures35 min
  1. Active Contol of vibrations & Noise and applications of AI/ML fo automotive NVH
    35 min

Opportunities that await you!

Career opportunities

Why people choose EveryEng

Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities-all in a flexible and supportive environment.

What learners say about this course

Sakina Gulamhusein
Sakina Gulamhusein
May 3, 2026

Quick gripe first: Module 4 on damping theory ran a bit long, and the quiz felt padded. That said, the habit of calling out what actually changes between versions saved time; fewer “is this still true?” pauses. As a freelancer, I liked how it tied NVH choices back to outcomes in prod, not just math. The Chapter 3 example on order tracking—specifically the gear whine FFT waterfall—stuck with me because it mapped cleanly to decisions you’d make in the arch review. Labs didn’t assume much infra, which helped. It closed a gap between what I knew and what I assumed I knew about noise paths.

Dhruman Patel
Dhruman Patel
May 3, 2026

Compared it against a couple other NVH intros, and this edged them out, but small gripe first: the labs assume you’ve already got MATLAB installed and a few toolboxes, which wasn’t called out. After that hiccup, the pacing clicked. The beginner framing helped connect equations to actual car behavior. The moment that stuck was Section 3.2 on engine mount tuning using a simple 2‑DOF model, then tying it to order tracking at 3,000 RPM. That bridged classroom math to something I’ve seen in prod issues. Notes on tire‑road noise were concise, not hand‑wavy. it's not flashy, but it moved me from “it works” to understanding why it works.

Namdev Gaikwad
Namdev Gaikwad Student
May 3, 2026

Sat through plenty of advanced NVH courses, and this one actually bites. It doesn’t float at slide level; it pushes into how decisions land in prod when targets get ugly, and that kept me engaged between meetings. The bit that stuck was the order-tracking walkthrough in the powertrain chapter, where they map 2nd order boom during a 3,200 RPM coastdown and show how a mount tweak shifts the peak; I’ve already mirrored that flow in my repo for a current PR. There’s practical glue too: tying CAE outputs to test obs, plus a quick nod to how CI can gate NVH regressions before release. I wasn't sold on the intro pacing, and I wished there was more on road-induced NVH at low RPS, but mostly it held up. I've felt the gap close between sim and test, and my day-to-day loop is shorter with fewer re-runs.

amit A
amit A Engineer
May 3, 2026

The material lined up with problems we’re wrestling with in the current sprint, especially NVH tradeoffs that leak into prod late. Chapter 6 on structure‑borne path analysis stuck with me, particularly the example tracing a 2.3k RPM order through the subframe mounts using transfer path analysis plots. It’s pitched at an advanced level and mostly works, though I wasn’t sold on the quick jump from test data to design actions without more arch context. I’ve already folded a few checks into our CI notes and repo docs, so the time felt well spent.

FREE

Access anytime

Questions and Answers

A: The correct choice maintains stiffness and corrosion resistance so the sensor phase stays stable over life. B fails when e‑coat chips and crevice corrosion shifts preload. C creeps under clamp load and walks the resonance. D corrodes aggressively in chloride splash and drifts fastest despite conversion coating.

A: The correct answer identifies a risk the muffler was never sized to address. A is still attenuated partially by passive volume. B is perceptible but energy‑limited. D remains filtered by the same acoustic path the muffler already handles.

A: The symbol enforces a consistent signal sign so the controller converges. B is set by capsule design, not the drawing. C is handled in the schematic, not GA. D would be called out with datums and angles, not a phase note.

A: The correct value comes from c/2L giving a low‑hundreds‑of‑Hz ceiling for small cars. B drops a zero and confuses structural modes. C uses c/L not c/2L. D doubles the frequency without a physical basis from trim mass.