Skip to main contentEngineering Courses, Mentoring & Jobs | EveryEng
Mechanical Design Engineer banner

Mechanical Design Engineer

Mechanical Design Engineer banner
Live online Advanced

Mechanical Design Engineer

4(24)
1 enrolled
1600 views
COMPLETED

Tell us and we’ll notify you when the next batch is scheduled.

100 hrs
-
Hindi , English
1600 views
HEXSPUR FOUNDATION
HEXSPUR FOUNDATIONMechanical Design Engineer & Trainer
  • 7-day money-back guarantee
  • Session recordings included
  • Certificate of completion

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

  • You work in Manufacturing & Industrial
  • You're a Mechanical Engineering / CAD & Analysis professional
  • You have 3+ years of hands-on experience in this field
  • You prefer live, instructor-led training with Q&A

You should skip if

  • You're new to this field with no prior experience
  • You need a different specialisation outside Mechanical Engineering
  • You need fully self-paced, on-demand content

Course details

Course suitable for

Key topics covered

  1. Introduction to CMS IntelliCAD and SolidWorks

    • Overview of software interfaces and essential tools

    • Setting up projects and organizing design workflows

  2. 2D Drafting and Annotation

    • Creating and editing 2D sketches

    • Applying annotations and dimensioning

    • Generating accurate technical drawings

  3. 3D Modeling Techniques

    • Solid and surface modeling

    • Creating complex geometries and assemblies

    • Managing part relationships and constraints in assemblies

  4. Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing (GD&T) Basics

    • Introduction to ASME Y14.5 standard

    • Understanding fundamental GD&T concepts: symbols, rules, and tolerance zones

    • Applying datums and basic controls

  5. Advanced GD&T Applications

    • Feature control frames and composite tolerancing

    • Form, profile, orientation, location, and runout tolerances

    • Analyzing and interpreting GD&T on real-world engineering drawings

  6. Tolerance Stack-Up Analysis

    • Methods for calculating and optimizing tolerances

    • Case studies for analyzing assemblies with multiple tolerance zones

  7. Practical Applications and Project-Based Learning

    • Design projects using CMS IntelliCAD and SolidWorks

    • Applying GD&T in project settings

    • Conducting design reviews and applying industry best practices

  8. Final Project and Assessment

    • Capstone project combining CAD modeling and GD&T

    • Evaluation of design accuracy, compliance with ASME Y14.5, and overall functionality

Opportunities that await you!

Career opportunities

Training details

This is a live course that has a scheduled start date.

Live session

Starts

Mon, Feb 3, 2025

1:30 PM UTC· your timezone

Duration

1 hour per day

100 days total

Course Attachments

CMS IntelliCAD Lecture Schedual.pdf

SolidWorks Lecture Contain (Part Modeling).pdf

Why people choose EveryEng

Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities-all in a flexible and supportive environment.

What learners say about this course

Bruno Mendel Savadogo
Bruno Mendel Savadogo Student
May 3, 2026

From a team lead seat, the tolerancing section with the shaft-bearing fit example stuck; it's practical for reviews where arch decisions bleed into fab notes and PRs don't catch it. Mostly good for beginners, though I wasn't sold on the materials chapter—wished there was more on fatigue calcs before handing juniors prod drawings.

ABHISHEK PATALE
ABHISHEK PATALE Piping engineer
May 3, 2026

The course moves past toy examples quickly and doesn't linger in beginner land, focusing on choices you'd actually make on the job. The GD&T tolerance stack-up in the “Shaft and Hub Fits” section, where a 0.02 mm tweak flipped clearance to interference, stuck. I wasn't sold on the CAD primer; it's fine, but I wished there was more on fatigue and failure modes. I've already applied a couple patterns by adding a fastener selection checklist to our repo and pointing to it in a PR that shipped to prod this week.

Soumen Metya
Soumen Metya Student
May 3, 2026

Was hunting for ways to tighten our workflow and fill some mech gaps before handoff to manufacturing. The fits & tolerances chapter stuck, especially the shaft‑bushing example where they walk ISO H7/g6 and show what breaks when you guess; that clicked fast. As a BootcampGrad, I mapped it to how we think about arch and infra in prod—assumptions propagate, same as a sloppy repo or CI config. Mostly good, though I wasn't sold on the skim of fatigue; still, it’ll nudge how I frame my next PR.

Muhammad Yaseen
Muhammad Yaseen Undergraduate student/Mechanical Engineer/Formula electric racing-NUST/vehicle dynamics engineer
May 3, 2026

The tolerance stack-up example in Chapter 3, it's where he walks through shaft/bearing fits, stuck; translating ±0.05 mm into assembly risk felt like prod failures. It's mostly clear for beginners, but I wasn't sold on the CAD screencast pace and wished there was more on materials tradeoffs beyond steel vs aluminum.

COMPLETED

-

Questions and Answers

A: Accepting the wider spacing relies on material strength and ignores bending amplification and fretting risk at the clamps. Increasing wall thickness shifts stress but drives weight and stiffness changes that break the original vibration substantiation. Reverting clamp spacing restores the qualified dynamic boundary conditions and keeps loads within the existing compliance envelope. Changing to Inconel alters mass, stiffness, and thermal growth enough to invalidate prior analyses and drawings.

A: Proof testing will screen out obvious defects and gross leaks before entry into service. It also demonstrates margin against one-time overpressure events near proof levels. Fatigue damage accumulates below proof stress and isn't exercised by a static test. Torque-related leaks are usually exposed during the proof or leak check itself.

A: CS‑25 doesn't assume ultimate loads are reached routinely in operation. Proof tests don't model long-term crack propagation under variable amplitude loads. Damage tolerance addresses the reality of small defects growing between inspections to failure. Corrosion control supports durability but doesn't replace crack growth assessment.

A: Lower operating pressure doesn't remove ovalization-driven stress concentration and flow disturbance. Vendor thinning limits don't capture in‑service vibration and fatigue effects. Meeting the established bend radius maintains known stress and fatigue allowables. Changing material temper affects allowables and corrosion behavior, expanding the certification impact.