<link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Caveat:wght@500;700&family=JetBrains+Mono:wght@400;500;600&family=Plus+Jakarta+Sans:wght@600;700;800&display=swap" rel="stylesheet" /> Skip to main contentEngineering Courses, Mentoring & Jobs | EveryEng
Should Costing banner

Should Costing

Should Costing banner
Live online Beginner

Should Costing

4(17)
4 enrolled
3708 views
COMPLETED

Tell us and we’ll notify you when the next batch is scheduled.

2 hrs
-
English
3708 views
Sarjerao Pingale
Sarjerao PingaleHead of Cost Engineering-India Region
  • Session recordings included
  • Certificate of completion
  • Foundational Learning
  • Access to Study Materials
Volume pricing for groups of 5+

Why enroll

Cost management is essential for all companies to control and manage costs to provide value to their customers. Should-cost analysis helps the user in cost estimation of the product and to obtain precise information for making necessary trade-offs. It also aids in price negotiations with the suppliers and to foresee supplier process inefficiencies. Should-cost analysis is a holistic approach to cost intervention and benefits us by analyzing each aspect of cost drivers vigilantly.

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

  • You work in Automotive
  • You're a Mechanical Engineering professional
  • You prefer live, instructor-led training with Q&A

You should skip if

  • You need a different specialisation outside Mechanical Engineering
  • You need fully self-paced, on-demand content

Course details

Understanding the drivers of raw materials and manufacturing costs is imperative to unlocking cost savings opportunities. Limited visibility into these cost drivers — and the overall production process — often results in incorrect component pricing, weakening your bargaining position with suppliers and making it all the more difficult to find avenues to cut costs. Should-cost analysis is a powerful cost estimation tool that equips and empowers your procurement team to furnish viable evidence to suppliers as part of negotiation efforts, helping you achieve a final cost estimate that is closer to your target price. New product development is the key driver of business sustenance. Once a product is launched in to the market, it has its own rivals to kill it. However, it will only sustain based on the cost and technological impact that differentiates itself from the rest. In order to establish a targeted cost for the product, cost management is quite essential and has to be initiated from the design stage in the product life cycle to achieve the target cost. Cost management denotes actions driven by the top management to satisfy (meet) customer’s requirements on reducing and controlling cost in the early stages of design. Hence Should-Cost analysis is essential for profitable new product development.

Course suitable for

Key topics covered

  • Should Cost Definition

  • Applications of costing

  • Objectives and Advantages of Should costing

  • Should costing for New Product Development process

  • Inference of Should costing vs purchase/manufacturing cost

  • Typical Should Cost Parameters

  • Hourly Machine rate

  • Tool amortization cost

  • Plant overheads

Opportunities that await you!

Career opportunities

Training details

This is a live course that has a scheduled start date.

COMPLETED

-

Questions and Answers

A: This lands near material cost plus realistic cycle time at volume, which is what a should-cost needs to anchor negotiation. B ignores machine and labour content entirely. C imports a low-volume, high-rate context that doesn’t apply at 500-off. D double counts waste and handling that disappear once the routing is stabilised.

A: The answer captures how marginal but degrading yield shifts cost back to you after launch. B focuses on pass/fail, not trend. C is a finance issue unrelated to physical yield. D may occur later but doesn’t explain the pricing gap today.

A: This choice reduces material waste and cycle time while keeping tolerances where needed. B inflates variable cost at this volume. C introduces unnecessary process steps and lead time. D adds distortion risk and inspection cost that undermine repeatability.

A: At this weight and cycle, press time overwhelms resin cost per part. B sounds intuitive but the math doesn’t support it. C assumes non-automated finishing that isn’t typical here. D is secondary unless volumes are tiny.