Skip to main contentEngineering Courses, Mentoring & Jobs | EveryEng
Uncoventional Completions - Oil and Gas Well Completions banner

Uncoventional Completions - Oil and Gas Well Completions

Uncoventional Completions - Oil and Gas Well Completions banner
Live online Beginner

Uncoventional Completions - Oil and Gas Well Completions

4(69)
1 enrolled
1425 views
₹ 499
1 hrs
Next month
English
1425 views
Team OG
Team OGUpstream Oil & Gas Technical Professional
  • 7-day money-back guarantee
  • Session recordings included
  • Certificate of completion

Why enroll

The participants will be introduced to Unconventional oil and gas and the different processes and tools which help with production of such hydrocarbons. They will gain understanding of the ever increasing challenges to produce Conventional oil and gas and the advantages and benefits of Unconventional Completion methods, due to which they are being deployed in an increasing percentage of oil and gas wells.

Is this course for you?

You should take this if

  • You work in Oil & Gas Upstream
  • You're a Petroleum Technology professional
  • You prefer live, instructor-led training with Q&A

You should skip if

  • You need a different specialisation outside Petroleum Technology
  • You need fully self-paced, on-demand content

Course details

With increasing challenges to producing oil and gas, newer systems and techniques for maximizing production from existing wells and for tapping into complex and difficult to produce reservoirs have gained widespread use. This course will introduce the participant to the major processes and equipment used for Unconventional production of hydrocarbons.

Course suitable for

Key topics covered

  • Unconventional Completion Systems:

  • Types and Techniques Bridge and Frac Plugs:

  • Composite and Dissolvable Frac Valves

  • Coiled Tubing completions

  • Shale and Tight Oil/Gas

Opportunities that await you!

Career opportunities

Training details

This is a live course that has a scheduled start date.

Why people choose EveryEng

Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities-all in a flexible and supportive environment.

What learners say about this course

Slimane Dridi
Slimane Dridi Well Services Field Technician
Feb 10, 2026

yes

sarath Selvaraj
sarath Selvaraj Offshore Construction Engineer
May 3, 2026

Started this to sanity-check how our team approaches completions against current practice, bridging some legacy heuristics with newer field habits. The section on plug-and-perf sequencing, especially the cluster efficiency example comparing 120-ft vs 150-ft stage spacing, stuck because it maps cleanly to how we reason about arch and infra tradeoffs in prod. It's mostly beginner-level and I wasn't sold on the light treatment of proppant transport, wished there was more on obs from real frac hits. Still, I've already tweaked how I'll frame my next PR.

sarath Selvaraj
sarath Selvaraj Offshore Construction Engineer
May 3, 2026

This course nudged how I think about legacy choices, kind of like refactoring old arch without breaking prod. It frames sand control as tradeoffs instead of rules, which clicked for me coming from software and infra, especially when you’re juggling constraints that look a lot like CI gates and RPS limits. The micro-detail that stuck was the screen sizing example in the “Gravel Pack vs Frac Pack” section, where they walk through median grain size and then show how one assumption cascades into cost and ops risk—felt like reading a PR where one default sneaks into prod. I wasn’t sold on every analogy to modern completions; the k8s-style modularity pitch was mostly helpful but a bit hand-wavy in spots. Still, the beginner pacing worked, and the oilgas context mapped cleanly to how we think about legacy systems in energyutilities. I’ve already got a note to tweak some of our internal logic after this, mostly around how we document assumptions before they fossilize in the repo.

Ebrahim Xoshnaw
Ebrahim Xoshnaw
May 3, 2026

The section headers pulled me in, and the content mostly delivered. Chapter 3’s pipeline hydraulics example, walking a pressure drop calc end to end, stuck; it clicked like budgeting RPS before a prod push, and the compressor station tradeoffs read like arch notes you’d leave on a PR. it's beginner-friendly without talking down, though I wasn't sold on how light the infra/obs tie-in was for energyutilities oilgas ops. I’ve already avoided a couple late CI-style scrambles that would've felt like debugging at 2am.

₹499

₹0 Early bird

Coming in Next Month

Questions and Answers

A: A: Differential is the load case for plugs during frac. Burst logic is a tubing habit and doesn't map here. B: API 11D1 revisions tightened test acceptance. If the spec doesn't freeze the edition, you can't accept a lower legacy rating. C: API 11D was split for a reason; legacy ratings aren't equivalent and cast iron changes debris risk. D: Field margins don't let you redefine the frac program to suit hardware.

A: A: Continuity after arming is the final gate; it can change during rig-up. B: Drift matters but it's static and already cleared earlier. C: FAT records don't protect you from field wiring errors. D: Perf design is a planning check, not a last-minute acceptance step.

A: A: Withdrawal doesn't rewrite your contract midstream. B: Contractual reference controls; updating needs MOC and sign-off. C: Mixing limits from different editions creates an untraceable basis. D: Anecdote isn't qualification, especially for elastomer swelling and blistering.

A: A: ESPs handle high water rates when sand control and metallurgy are addressed. B: Rod pumps struggle with sand and high rates in horizontals. C: Gas lift depends on stable gas supply and doesn't suit early flowback. D: Jet pumps trade simplicity for efficiency losses that hurt at this rate.