Failure Analysis
Chaitanya Purohit
Consultant
$ 20
Beginner course for learners
Foundational Learning
Access to Study Materials
Self-Paced Learning
Failure Analysis
Trainers feedback
4
(28 reviews)
Chaitanya Purohit
Consultant
Course type
Instructor led live training
Course duration
2 Hrs
Course start date & time
Coming in Next Month
Language
English
This course format is where trainer will explain you the subject via online live session. Date and time are not decided yet but it will be planned within next 2 weeks after you enroll & pay for this course()?. Get in touch with our team if any clarification is required.
Why enroll
Mastering Failure Analysis can significantly enhance your career in industries like aerospace, automotive, and energy, leading to roles like Failure Analyst, Reliability Engineer, or Materials Scientist, with median salaries ranging from $90,000 to over $140,000. With this training, you'll gain expertise in investigating and determining the causes of component or system failures, identifying root causes, and implementing corrective actions. This knowledge will also equip you to develop and implement failure prevention strategies, improve product design and reliability, and reduce warranty claims. As a certified Failure Analyst, you'll be highly sought after by companies seeking to minimize failures, reduce costs, and ensure product reliability and safety. Your expertise will also enable you to lead failure investigation teams, develop and implement failure prevention programs, and drive business growth.
Course details
Course suitable for
Oil & Gas Aerospace Automotive Chemical & Process Mechanical Noise & Vibration
Key topics covered
Introduction to Failure Analysis
Definition and importance of Failure Analysis in engineering, manufacturing, and maintenance
The role of Failure Analysis in improving product design, manufacturing processes, and operational reliability
Key concepts: failure modes, failure mechanisms, and root causes
Differences between reactive failure analysis and proactive failure prevention
Failure Types and Classification
Common types of failure: mechanical, electrical, thermal, chemical, and material failures
Failure modes: fatigue, fracture, corrosion, wear, thermal degradation, electrical failure, and others
How to classify and categorize failures based on system, component, and environment
Understanding failure severity: catastrophic vs. non-catastrophic failures, minor vs. major failures
Failure Analysis Process Overview
The step-by-step process for conducting Failure Analysis: identification, investigation, diagnosis, and corrective actions
Initial assessment: data collection, understanding operating conditions, and failure symptoms
Determining whether failure is systemic, localized, or a one-time event
Defining the scope and objectives of the analysis to focus resources effectively
Data Collection and Investigation Techniques
Methods for collecting and preserving failure data: photographs, logs, eyewitness accounts, and physical evidence
Tools for evidence gathering: inspection, testing, and sampling
The role of forensic analysis and non-destructive testing (NDT) in Failure Analysis
Analyzing operational data, environmental conditions, and material specifications that may have contributed to the failure
Root Cause Analysis and Problem-Solving
Integrating Root Cause Analysis (RCA) techniques to uncover the underlying cause of failure
Use of tools like the 5 Whys, Fishbone diagram, Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA), and Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)
Differentiating between direct causes, contributing factors, and root causes
Identifying systemic problems in design, manufacturing, maintenance, or operation that led to failure
Material and Structural Failure Analysis
Understanding material properties and how they relate to failure mechanisms (e.g., tensile strength, ductility, hardness)
Analysis of common material failure mechanisms: fatigue, corrosion, embrittlement, creep, and wear
Techniques for examining structural failures: fracture surface analysis, microstructure examination, and metallographic analysis
The role of stress analysis and load calculations in predicting material and structural failures
Mechanical and Electrical Failure Modes
Mechanical failures: causes of fatigue, vibration, thermal stress, wear, and overloading
Electrical failures: insulation breakdown, short circuits, overheating, and component degradation
Investigating common mechanical and electrical failure patterns in motors, pumps, turbines, circuits, and components
Diagnosing issues in rotating machinery, bearings, gears, and electrical wiring
Thermal and Chemical Failure Mechanisms
Thermal failures: the impact of temperature extremes, thermal cycling, and heat stress on materials and components
Chemical failures: corrosion, oxidation, chemical attack, and degradation of materials exposed to chemicals or environmental conditions
Failure analysis of components exposed to high temperatures, pressure, or corrosive environments
Techniques for evaluating the effect of thermal or chemical degradation on system performance
Failure Analysis Techniques and Tools
Fractography: analyzing fracture surfaces to identify the cause of failure (e.g., fatigue, brittle fracture, ductile fracture)
Microscopy and Metallography: using optical, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and X-ray techniques for material analysis
Non-Destructive Testing (NDT): ultrasound, magnetic particle testing, eddy current testing, and dye penetrant testing for identifying hidden failures
Finite Element Analysis (FEA): simulating stresses and strains in components to predict failure points and mechanisms
Preventive and Corrective Actions
Developing corrective actions to address the root cause of failure and prevent recurrence
Identifying preventive measures based on failure patterns, such as design improvements, material selection, and process changes
Using Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) to proactively address potential failure points
Implementing a preventive maintenance program to monitor equipment health and reduce failure risks
Training details
This is a live course that has a scheduled start date.
Live session
Our Alumni Work At
Why people choose EveryEng
Industry-aligned courses, expert training, hands-on learning, recognized certifications, and job opportunities—all in a flexible and supportive environment.
- Industry Veteran
- Trainer Review

Lummus
I love how EveryEng makes complex engineering concepts easy to understand. The platform offers valuable insights, great mentors, and a supportive community. It's truly a one-stop solution for engineers worldwide.

Siddharth Mishra
Project Manager
Frankfrut, Germany

ITER
The user experience on EveryEng is fantastic! The platform is simple, efficient, and provides excellent educational content. It helps developing new skills and gain confidence in engineering career.

Nirbhay Naik
Engineer
France

Heelium
EveryEng is my go-to platform for engineering education. The courses are easy to follow, and the instructors are very knowledgeable. The platform has helped my team gain confidence and expertise in our field.

Siddharth Jain
Co-Founder
Pune, India

L&T
EveryEng is a game-changer in engineering education. The platform provides high-quality courses, interactive learning experiences, and excellent mentor support. It has significantly helped me grow in my engineering career.

Omkar Zolekar
Ass Manager, Projects
Mumbai, India

Penta Global Engineering
Engineering education should be hands-on, and that’s exactly what EveryEng provides. From interactive Q&A sessions to on-the-job training, this platform offers everything a modern engineer needs to succeed!

Prashant Joshi
Operation Director
Dubai, UAE
$ 20
- $ 0 Early bird discount
Coming in Next Month
Questions and Answers
A: This leads to minor disagreement alarms that distract operators but still preserve independent sensing paths; This treats SIL independence as a paperwork exercise and ignores common cause failure through shared hardware; This focuses on dynamic performance and misses the loss of redundancy under faulted conditions; This correctly identifies a common cause failure where one physical fault removes both level signals.
A: This is handled because pressure rises quickly and trips before structural limits are crossed; This confuses integrity protection with reliability degradation mechanisms; This describes an operational impact rather than a hazard escalation; This captures a fast thermal and mechanical failure mode that occurs without exceeding the pressure trip.
A: This ignores hydrogen-assisted cracking that is not tied to gross yielding; This treats corrosion rate as the driver and misses environmentally assisted cracking; This worsens cracking risk by increasing hardness and hydrogen uptake; This aligns hardness with sour service limits to cut SSC initiation risk.
A: This downplays that CA is subtracted from pressure design thickness, not just weight; This is a commercial issue and doesn't address degradation assessment; This misattributes CA to welding variables rather than design assumptions; This identifies the risk of inspectors assuming more corrosion margin than actually exists.
A: This assumes vibration responds faster than temperature rise in all cases; This overstates the link between vibration amplitude and fatigue life management; This conflates seal degradation with global casing vibration; This captures a damage mechanism that can occur quietly until catastrophic contact happens.
A: This design relaxes under vibration as filler creeps; This material damps vibration but extrudes and loses preload; This requires precise groove geometry and can still fret under misalignment; This maintains stress through micro-serrations that resist unloading cycles.
A: This assumes ideal sequencing and ignores credible common demand; This separates compliance from physical performance; This understates the impact of built-up backpressure on capacity; This recognizes hydraulic interaction that defeats assumed relief sizing.
A: This is addressed because no new feed enters the vessel; This ignores that isolation limits fuel to the fire zone; This misreads pressure transient behavior after isolation; This identifies damage driven by what’s already inside the equipment.
A: This misses tight planar cracks aligned with the beam; This assumes accessibility and magnetic material without confirming crack depth; This only reveals open-to-surface flaws; This captures early-stage fatigue cracks before final fracture.
A: This ignores trend-based degradation and common mode risk during simultaneous activities; This misreads drift as stability and increases exposure time; This normalizes degraded performance without addressing cause; This manages latent failure under constrained emergency response conditions.
More from Same Author
- Technical Courses
- Articles
4 (28)
357
Online
Live courses
Beginner
Online
Live courses
Interacting with trainer
4 (28)
352
Online
Live courses
Beginner
Online
Live courses
Interacting with trainer
4 (28)
611
Online
Live courses
Beginner
Online
Live courses
Interacting with trainer
Earning and Growth option in same Industry Domain
- Pre-recorded
- Online live session
- Offline
- Articles
4 (1419)
1674
5
E-Learning
Unlimited access
Beginner
E-Learning
Unlimited access
Pre-recorded videos
4 (126)
2690
15
E-Learning
Unlimited access
Beginner
E-Learning
Unlimited access
Pre-recorded videos
4 (12)
3091
1
E-Learning
Unlimited access
Beginner
E-Learning
Unlimited access
Pre-recorded videos
More Training & Development option to expand your reach
- Technical courses
- Soft-skills courses
- Seminars
- Articles & Blogs
4 (16)
1918
6
Online
Live courses
December 31
160 Hrs
Advanced
Online
Live courses
Interacting with trainer
4
156
Online
Live courses
February 21
25 Hrs
Advanced
Online
Live courses
Interacting with trainer
4 (16)
784
Online
Live courses
February 21
30 Hrs
Advanced
Online
Live courses
Interacting with trainer